Ðûæêîâà Ò.Ñ.
Àëòàéñêèé
ãîñóäàðñòâåííûé óíèâåðñèòåò, Ðîññèÿ
The Specific
of Online Media’s Arts and Cultural Reviews
In traditional print media art
reviews mainly take a shadow position. Newspapers are radically shortening their cultural
supplements. But with the
development of Internet and the convenience of electronic publishing art
reviews received an additional recognition. The specific of e-publishing is
well suited for that kind of texts. This article discusses the (new) standards of
form and structure development of art reviews in electronic magazines and
newspapers and its reflection on cultural journalism. The practical part is based on the analysis of e-published art
reviews devoted to the exhibition “Gesichter der Renaissance” (Berlin, Bode-Museum,
25.08.2011- 20.11.2011).
From the very beginning critical
reviews accompanied the development of critical vision and science. They turned
out to be an integral part of journalistic writing. Some of the periodicals
lead review columns, some of them specialize on critical reviewing. The crisis in the newspaper industry has
resulted in newspapers trying to slash all costs that appear remotely
unnecessary, and this means above all the cultural reviews. But Web 2.0 has
well and truly redefined editorial outfits by establishing of new
“institutions” of critical reviewing: forums, blogs and social networks, which have made once passive
readers into active reviewers and critics. Today’s Web users are as cultured as
feuilletonists; a cultural info-elite no longer enjoys a headstart on access to
information [Medicus, 2007 http://www.goethe.de/wis/med/dos/jou/jiw/kult/en2304393.htm].
The benefits of e-reviewing were widely
described by many authors (see Mey, 2004). Particularly open access, constant update
and flexibility in form and text structure are pointed out. But the mainly
proclaimed benefits are relatively unspecific comparing to the possible
hypertext-structure of e-reviews that can merge various text segments and data.
First of all the hypertext-structure helps the personal subdividing of information. The Internet is a “user-driven medium”: In
terms of content, the consumer determines the “what”, while the editorial
producers are at most left with the “how”. On top of that, the desire for
content-on-demand is becoming more insistent all the time.
Additionally
to the essential text construction and presentation the further hybridization
through the linking of various texts, pictures, videos and information sources
is possible. On the basis of one publication the readers can get access to the
very different additional information. Links to different newsgroups, social
networks, portals, research groups, glossaries, related news, reader comments
etc. can contribute to more lively discussions. As an illustrative example of formal
hybridization the precisely segmented film reviews in Frankfurter Allgemeine
Zeitung (http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/kino/video-filmkritiken) can be mentioned. Alongside with traditional text reviews, pictures
and reader comments it includes video reviews, where some movie scenes are
accompanied by audio reviews.
In the
following some more practical examples concerning the form of exhibition
reviews in German electronic periodicals will be given, they reflect not only
different views and visions but also different types of content construction.
The analyzed reviews are devoted to the widely discussed exhibition “Gesichter
der Renaissance” organized by The Staatliche Museen zu Berlin and the
Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York from 25 August to 20 November 2011. The
large exhibition brought together at the Bode-Museum more than 150 major works
of Italian portraiture by more than 40 masters of the early Renaissance. With more
than 250 000 visitors, 2,412 booked tours and 26,000 copies of catalogue
sold it turned out to be one of the biggest cultural events of the year
supported by the main television and radio broadcasters as well as the
publications in the main German print and online magazines and newspapers.
All in
all the three main aspects were highlighted during the exhibition time as they
are easy to see through the articles’ headlines.
1. The
unique character of event: “Näher zu Gott” (Spiegel), “Die schönsten
Gesichter kommen nach Berlin“ (Welt), „KunstSpektakuläre Renaissance-Shau
in Berlin“ (Fokus), “Schöne Damen, mächtige Herren“
(Art-Kunstmagazin), „Aus der Wunderkammer des Gesichts“ (Frankfurter Allgemeine
Zeitung).
2. The
masterpiece of Leonardo da Vinci as a special guest: “Dame mit possierlichem
Tier” (Tageszeitung), “Berlin zaubert DaVinci aus dem Hut” (Handelsblatt), „Das
Schöne und das Beast“ (Stern).
3. The
visitors urge: “Die Schlange am Graben. Enormer Ansturm auf die "Gesichter der Renaissance" (Der Tagesspiegel).
The
question of form and structure of some articles is also worth to pay attention
to.
The
article presented by Marcus Woeller on the website of Tageszeitung (http://www.taz.de/!77086/) follows
quite a typical scheme of art review composition including the lid with a
describing scene, information about place and time, the main displays and
authors, describing part and evaluation. Pictures slide-show, links to related
news and evaluation scale as well as the opportunity to sponsor the article you
like using PayPal system represent the additional elements of the content.
Another remarkable way of review
construction offers the cultural journalist of the newspaper “Welt” Gabriela
Walde (http://www.welt.de/kultur/article13564994/Was-IT-Girls-mit-den-Renaissance-Damen-verbindet.html). The article “Was IT-Girls mit den Renaissance-Damen verbindet” is
based on the comparison of two generations and the ways of self-representing. The
article starts with the thesis about the common features of Italian portraits
and present IT-Girls images in ladies magazines. Some certain criteria and
slide pictures are aimed to prove the author’s suggestion. The images of
Italian Renaissance men and women are there along with the photos of
celebrities like Julie Deply, Cory Kennedy and David Beckham. Links to social
networks, related news, museum’s website, RSS as well as reader recommendations
and comments complete the article’s structure.
The
German art magazine “art-Das Kunstmagazin“ focuses more on historical-cultural
point and description of painting style (http://www.art-magazin.de/kunst/44949/gesichter_der_renaissance_berlin). At the same time more attention is paid to the organizers of this
cultural event as well as to the process of organizing. In conclusion there is
a reference to the special print version of magazine about Italian Renaissance
and the link for booking.
These
are just some of the possibilities of constructing cultural e-review with the
use of various additional sources. However, it is impossible to ignore the
gradual decline in the reputation of criticism. The present public opinion is
that it is more about amusing the readership than about criticism. It is about
launching of friends, about gaining the acknowledgement of peers one wishes to
impress in the other feature sections, and about mutual status bolstering in
the media sector. In short, it is a question of networking in the media
industry with the aim of advancing one’s own career [Tenta, 2009 http://www.goethe.de/kue/lit/aug/en5011931.htm].
There is also a tendency in criticism towards
service journalism – “feel-good”, designed to accompany and reinforce marketing
activities, without any critical distance and without any critical judgement. Amateur and professional critics on
the Internet tend to lack the authority of good print critics. Their
impartiality cannot be verified, especially given the arbitrary outbursts of
enthusiasm on the part of amateur experts who, under the guise of a supposed
democratization of criticism, are in reality de-professionalizing the art
[Tenta,
2009 http://www.goethe.de/kue/lit/aug/en5011931.htm].
The content
is published through the internet, which despite past predictions has not
replaced the print media. Rather, it’s more fair to agree that the internet has
become an independent medium in its own right.
In the
meantime it is now possible to train to become an arts and cultural journalist
due to some postgraduate programs in Europe. However, it is not quite clear,
just how future-oriented this profession might be. Many cultural journalists in
our day see themselves as lone-wolf authors who use their medium as a platform
for their individual interests. As critical intellectuals, they should take a
stance on important issues of cultural morality. And that’s where cultural
journalists are closest to their reading and listening public, all of whom are
ardent consumers of culture.
Literature:
1. Medicus, Thomas, The German Feuilleton is Not a Rocking-Chair, URL: http://www.goethe.de/wis/med/dos/jou/jiw/kult/en2304393.htm
[Access: 01.03.2012]
2. Mey, Günther, Elektronisches Publizieren – eine Chance für die
Textsorte Rezension? Anmerkungen zur Nutzung des Internet als "scholarly
review resource", URL: http://hsr-trans.zhsf.uni-koeln.de/hsrretro/docs/artikel/hsr/hsr2004_604.pdf
[Access: 3.03.2012]
3. Porombka, Stefan, Kritiken schreiben, Ein Trainingshandbuch, Konstanz:
UVK-Verlag, 2006.
4. Schalkowski, Edmund, Kommentar, Glosse, Kritik, Konstanz: UVK-Verlag, 2011.
5. Tenta, Sabine, Literary Criticism as Service Journalism? An Interview
with Sigfrid Löffler, URL: http://www.goethe.de/kue/lit/aug/en5011931.htm [Access: 3.03.2012]
6. Tilmann, Christina, Bildende Kunst, klassisch, in: Rezension und Kritik,
hg. v. Edmund Schalkowski, Konstanz: UVK-Verlag, 2005, S. 135-150.
7. Cultural Journalism Online – German-Canadian Panel Discussion at the
Goethe-Institut Toronto, URL: http://www.goethe.de/wis/med/dos/jou/jiw/kult/en2577723.htm [Access: 15.03.2012]