Geography and Geology/5. Cartography and geoinformatics

 

Student Nebosenko T.V.; Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor  Garkusha I.N.

National Mining University

Research methods of segmentation in the process of classification types of the terrestrial covering

 

While thematic processing of space pictures, information classes are defined as a set of objects, which it’s necessary to allocate according to the requirements of a solved thematic problem. Application of segmentation algorithms that use certain conditions of uniformity of object classes, frequently leads to allocation segments on the image that are not corresponding to information classes of the solved thematic problem. To overcome the arising effects the preliminary processing of the image by classification algorithms has been included in the segmentation process. 

Research objective - improvement of quality and efficiency of the image segmentation.

The fragment of space picture that has been received by TM scanner (satellite Landsat - 5), displaying fields with crops of grain, was used in the research. Image classification that has used MultiSpecs’ applied file with reference sites has been performed by the following algorithms: minimum distance to means, correlation (SAM), matched filter (CEM), Fisher linear discriminant, the Gaussian maximum likelihood pixel scheme, the ECHO spectral/spatial classifier.

The reference sites, belonging to five classes of a terrestrial covering have been selected in ENVI program for comparison of the classification results. Since the data from picture has distribution close to normal, the following classification algorithms were used: Mahalanobis Distance and Maximum Likelihood (the Bayesian classifier).

The best result has been received in ENVI with application of classification algorithm Mahalanobis Distance to the image.

The result of classification has been subjected to processing in MATLAB and Definiens Developer. Three segmentation methods were used in MATLAB: threshold, a morphological watershed, planimetric. Algorithms of planimetric and threshold segmentation have yielded unsatisfactory results.

To eliminate the superfluous segmentation in case of application morphological watershed algorithm the following approach is offered. Before watershed segmentation, gradient modules of the image which use linear filtration methods (Sobel and Laplasian filters) have been calculated. The morphological watershed result has been defined by result of gradients calculation.

Multiresolution segmentation of classification result has been performed in Definiens Developer program. The best result of segmentation of the investigated image has been received by setting the Scale parameter equal to 35. Thus, integral objects with the big area were shared to the parts in the image. Such phenomenon was not observed while performing the segmentation in MATLAB. 

As enough general quality criterion of segmentation results Hausdorff distance has been used. This criterion measures the distance between two pixel sets:

 and .

where

If , this means that all the pixels belonging to  are not father than d from some pixels of . This measure indeed gives a good similarity measure between the two images.

Using the given indicator, it has been established that any of the existing methods does not give exact allocation of the object borders. Therefore, segmentation method based on the object borders allocation by brightness levels has been offered. The segmentation results that were received by this method can be used in the following areas: in land management for calculation of the various function areas; in agriculture to control the crops, both all types, and separately set by the researcher.

The offered method allows precisely allocate the object borders on the image and raises efficiency of the segmentation.

 

The literature

 

1. R.Gonzalez, R.Woods «Digital image processing » Moscow: The Technosphere, 2005. – 1072 p.

2. S. Chabrier, H. Laurent, B. Emile, C. Rosenberger and P. Marché «A comparative study of supervised evaluation criteria for image segmentation»