Martynov V.
L., Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor
Kremenchuk Mykhaylo Ostrogradsky National
University, Ukraine
BUILDING ENERGY EFFICIENCY BY OPTIMIZING THEIR PARAMETERS
Abstract. A method of
optimizing multiple parameters simultaneously energy efficient buildings (shape,
aspect ratio, heat loss resistance building envelope, building azimuth, etc.)
to improve energy efficiency.
Key words: energy efficient
buildings, geometric modeling, optimization parameters, heat balance, walling,
architectural engineering.
Introduction. Today the problem enerhoresursozberezhennya in
construction requires a comprehensive solution. This is possible by optimizing
the parameters of buildings that significantly affect energy consumption (for
heating and hot water supply and other buildings). In developing the projects
of new buildings is important to increase their energy efficiency, renewable
clean energy sources (sun, earth, wind, etc..), Development of energy-efficient
and energy efficient buildings. Energy efficiency of buildings is possible by
optimizing the parameters (shape, proportions, the distribution of insulation,
orientation of buildings, heliopryymachiv) and others.
In Figure 1 shows the geometrical parameters of the
building that affect energy efficiency.
Analysis of previous studies. In addressing the issue of
energy efficiency of buildings devoted to works [1-4], but they determined the
optimal ratio of buildings in terms of minimizing heat loss through the
building envelope for one parameter (proportions). In [5, 6] separately
optymizuvalasya form of buildings and individual settings opaque insulation of
building structures in terms of minimum thermal balance walling
Purpose. Develop a way of optimizing multiple geometric
parameters sided energy efficient buildings at the same time to minimize the
thermal balance of protecting structures from the atmosphere, increasing the
energy efficiency of buildings.
Material and results of the study. The surface of the face
of the building consists of separate facets. Curved surface is approximated by
planes formed edge. For buildings offer a way of optimizing multiple geometric
parameters simultaneously to reduce the thermal balance of walling. This is a
mathematical model of heat balance of each edge of energy-efficient building
that includes the proportions of the building (a, b, h, rb, ω, α), insulation parameters
(resistance to heat Rsti)
opaque structures (facets), the parameters of insulation (heat resistance Rvi ) translucent
structures, area light constructions settings arrangement of windows on the
facades of the building (Avi, ωvi)
azimuthal orientation of the building (Ab)
targeting options heliopryymachiv (Aki,
ωki) heliopryymachiv area (Ski) and others.
Square windows on the sides can
be found by the formula:
f(Spid Npov F г), (1)
where Spid = f (a, b, rb,
α) - floor area floor, which vary depending on the proportions of the
building; Npov-number of floors of the building; F-value area of windows to
floor area (from 0.2 to 0.125) rea - rate windows of the house walls (from 0 to
1).
Mathematical model of
heat balance of the building faces may submit a nonlinear function of several
variables
The target
function
+
–– .
(2)
Heat balance
of walling face of the building while minimized by the following formula:
system
constraints
; (3)
. (4)
Heat balance
of walling face of the building while minimized by the following formula:
, (5)
but limited
options resistance heat insulation:
, . (6)
Depending on the type
of optimization parameters specified limit, where - the notional and actual
outdoor temperature; ri - albedo surface faces - energy light air
short-radiation; àáî
Figure 1 -
Parameters affecting the efficiency
by optimizing the
orientation of the building - the building azimuth, and - the angle between the
orientation of the building and faces - of korotkohvylvoyi solar radiation
received at heliopryymach - heat transfer coefficient between the outer surface
of enclosure and the outside air - square opaque edge walling - resistance heat
opaque building envelope, 183 - number of days heating period - resistance heat
translucent walling - the number of degree-day heating season - coefficient
taking into account shading window opening opaque elements - the coefficient of
relative penetration of solar radiation for translucent structures; Ki - factor
actual cloud conditions that affect the incoming solar radiation.
Solving this problem
is to optimize a nonlinear function using the computer for several variables
(the method of Hook-Dzhyvisa).
As a result of
research in optimizing the proportions of the building as a rectangular
parallelepiped (variables proportions (a,
b, h)) the effect of reducing heat loss was 5.68%. When optimizing
redistribution insulation (insulation resistance variables Rst1 heat, Rst2, Rst3, Rst4,
Rdah5, Rpid6) - heat loss decreased by 11.23%. When
optimizing redistribution insulation (insulation resistance variables Rst1 heat, Rst2, Rst3,
Rst4, Rdah5, Rpid6) and optimization of
building aspect ratio (ratio variables (a, b, h,)) reduce heat loss was 12.31%.
Conclusions. To resolve this
issue enerhoresursozberezhennya proposed method of optimization of several
parameters of energy efficient buildings (proportions and distribution of
insulation, building orientation, etc..) To minimize heat balance walling with
the atmosphere, which increases the efficiency of the building. For the home in
Kiev by optimizing the proportions and distribution of insulation heat loss
through the building envelope decreased by 12.31%. This method should be used
in complex problem solving enerhoresursozberezhennya.
REFERENCES
1. Ìàðêóñ Ò.À., Ìîðèñ Ý.Í. Çäàíèÿ,
êëèìàò è ýíåðãèÿ. – Ë.: Ãèäðîìåòåîèçäàò, 1985. – 540 ñ.
2. Ìàòåìàòè÷åñêîå ìîäåëèðîâàíèå è îïòèìèçàöèÿ
òåïëîâîé ýôôåêòèâíîñòè çäàíèé /
Þ. À. Òàáóíùèêîâ, Ì. Ì. Áðîäà÷.
― Ì.: ÀÂÎÊ-ÏÐÅÑÑ, 2002. ― 194 ñ.
3. Ïpîåêòèpîâàíèå ýíåpãîýêîíîìè÷íûõ è ýíåpãîàêòèâíûõ ãpàæäàíñêèõ
çäàíèé / Â.Ñ. Áåëÿåâ, Ï.Ï. Õîõëîâà. – Ì.: Âûñø. øê., 1991. – 255 ñ.
4. Ìàðòèíîâ Â.Ë. Ãåîìåòðè÷íå
ìîäåëþâàííÿ ïàðàìåòð³â åíåðãîàêòèâíèõ æèòëîâèõ áóäèíê³â // Ìàòåð³àëè VI ̳æíàðîäíî¿
íàóêîâî-ïðàêòè÷íî¿ êîíôåðåíö³¿ «Ãåîìåòðè÷åñêîå ìîäåëèðîâàíèå è êîìïüþòåðíûå
òåõíîëîãèè: òåîðèÿ, ïðàêòèêà, îáðàçîâàíèå». – Õàðüêîâ, 2009. – Ñ. 153–158.
5. Ñåðãåé÷óê Î.Â. Îïòèì³çàö³ÿ
ðîçïîä³ëó óòåïëþâà÷à ïî ïîâåðõí³ áóä³âë³ ïðè çàäàíîìó êëàñ³ éîãî åôåêòèâíîñò³ /
Î.Â. Ñåðãåé÷óê // Ìàòåð³àëè VI ̳æíàðîäíî¿ Êðèìñüêî¿
íàóêîâî-ïðàêòè÷íî¿ êîíôåðåíö³¿ «Ãåîìåòðè÷íå òà êîìï’þòåðíå ìîäåëþâàííÿ:
åíåðãîçáåðåæåííÿ, åêîëîã³ÿ, äèçàéí». – ѳìôåðîïîëü, 2009. – Ñ. 44–49.
6. Ñåðãåé÷óê Î.Â. Îïòèì³çàö³ÿ ôîðìè
åíåðãîåôåêòèâíî¿ áóä³âë³, çîâí³øíÿ îáîëîíêà ÿêîãî n–ïàðàìåòðè÷íà
ïîâåðõíÿ // Ìàòåð³àëè VI² ̳æíàðîäíî¿ Êðèìñüêî¿ íàóêîâî-ïðàêòè÷íî¿
êîíôåðåíö³¿ «Ãåîìåòðè÷íå ìîäåëþâàííÿ òà êîìï’þòåðíèé äèçàéí». – ѳìôåðîïîëü,
2010. – Ñ. 150–155.