Candidate
of Pedagogical Sciences Yurina E.N., senior lecturer Trusova T.V.
South-Russia
State University of Economics and Service, t.
Shakhty, Russia
PROBLEMS OF SELF-REALIZATION OF A
PERSON IN THE PROFESSIONAL SPACE
The
ability, which is characterized by many researchers as constant inner desire of
a person for self-education and self-development is considered in modern
pedagogical science in terms of individual self-promotion in professional
space.
The
main motive power of professional development is the personality itself, its
needs for self-actualization, self-realization in its profession. It is the
subject who creates his/her professional biography.
Self-determination
of a personality manifests itself in a deliberate choice, in an effort to take
his/her own, quite independent position in the system of professional
relations. The result of professional self-determination is the formation of professional
identity. The competent professional is an active player in the labour market
capable to choose the route of professional activities and successfully adapt
to changing conditions in the labour market.
Professional
space is one of the external factors that determine the process of formation of
professional identity. In the course of identification there is some awareness
of oneself within the professional environment and as a part of the
professional space.
Personality-oriented
approach implies that the motive power of professional development is the
personality itself, its need for self-actualization of its personal and
professional potential. The decisive factor of the development is the
interaction of a person with the world of trades and people involved in the
real and virtual professional activities.
Personality-oriented
approach is supposed to focus on self-development and self-realization in a
particular occupation. The leading motives of these processes are the prospects
of professional growth (career) and the meaningful professional future of a
person.
The
process of professional growth of a person is an open nonlinear and unbalanced
system, which does not limit the development, as its main factors become
complicated over time one can record their new status and levels of development.
A
professional can make progress in the professional space if he has formed a
system of adequate professional notions enabling to make his life plans, which
organize and direct his activities. These notions have a significant impact on
the professional development of a personality. How well the professional
notions are formed is one of the determinants of successful self-promotion of a
person in the professional space. Another determinant is the internal
environment of an individual, its activity, the need for self-realization.
The
nonlinear way of thinking suggested by synergy assumes complete and
multidimensional perception of the changeable, unstable and complex world, the
willingness for self-actualization in the world’s diversity.
The
process of professional self-promotion is considered in connection with the
process of achieving success and career making. Professional success, according
to L. Seiwert, is self-assessment of the professional level achieved,
individual perception by the person of how fully his abilities are used and
what opportunities for self-expression, reforming of oneself are provided by
the particular professional activity [1].
The
process of professional self-promotion of a person in the professional space is
initiated both by the environment and the development of a personality itself
and is one of the most important manifestations of mental development of a
person, his formation as a valuable participant of the community of
professionals and – more broadly - social community as a whole [2].
Professional
self-organization is the ability of a specialist for “self-cultivation” of his
internal resources, i.e. his personal consciousness structures that make his
professional activity creative, assuming constant growth of his internal
resources. Due to the professional self-organization there are new qualities of
a person representing independent ways of his ideologically-evaluative attitude
to his professional activity.
The
ability for self-promotion can be broadly defined as the ability of a person to
understand, formulate and solve his own problems of life and problems of
personal self-development, to show the qualities testifying to a new, higher
level of activity, independence and personal self-control, to achieve sustained
success in one or more activities.
Self-promotion
is regarded as an open field of possibilities to show different levels of
self-realization and self-development of a person. It is self-realization of a
person’s desire to achieve the utmost of his abilities in the professional
space that is very promising due to the change of approaches to the solution of
the problems of internal development of a personality and the striving of the
system to organize itself into a new quality.
The
main source of self-promotion of a person is in the system itself, i.e. it is
internal. However, in order to start the mechanism of self-organization this
source should be “fed” from different external sources of information.
Pedagogical synergy defines the following objects of transformations as the
external sources “feeding” self-organization: the contents of education, a
situation, values, professional activity, relationships, psychological comfort.
Self-organization provides motives for
professional activity and opportunities for self-promotion in the professional
space, for being critical and reflective to yourself and others, the
development of independent (autonomous) understanding of the meaning of
self-promotion, etc.
It was
A. Maslow who introduced the term “self-realization”. A personality
development in Maslow’s theory is represented as a person making ascend of the
stairs of his needs. Questions of motivation for such ascend are principal and
describe the person as “being willing”. Thus self-promotion can be considered
as self-actualization, self-realization and also a person’s needs to become
what he can become.
The
efficiency of professional formation of a person in many respects depends on
the personal and professional potential of a man, objective and subjective
possibilities of its implementation in his education and profession.
The
psychological barriers of development are professional self-determination,
adaptation, cryses of professional development, deformation due to profession,
etc.
Labour
market condition changes as well as problems that modern society has faced,
such as the crisis of incompetence, have accelerated the changes in
professional education. At the social level the desire for greater autonomy and
self-determination on the workplace increases. Self-management in education and
on the workplace becomes an important element in self-promotion of a person. If
quite recently a high-school graduate got knowledge that was quite sufficient
for his entire subsequent career, now everything is changing so rapidly that a
specialist has to study all his life.
All
this resulted in the development of a new concept in the society – “Education
through life”, which in turn requires certain changes in education paradigm.
An
important objective of the educational policy is training and adaptation of a
future specialist to the life in market conditions so that he could realize
himself in these conditions through adequate self-presentation and
self-management.
The key
to achieving professional success is the development of self-management skills
– “managing the specialist’s own resources” that is the ability to acquire,
keep, develop and effectively use them.
According
to some foreign researchers (Eberling, Woodcock, Fransis et. al), in contrast
to the traditional understanding of management, in which the subject must
always be inside the system, self-management (self-organization and
self-control of a person) has to deal with so-called self-organized, or, in
terms of natural sciences, collapsing (compressed, self-liquidating) in time
and space systems. In them the subject can be either inside or outside the
system and the situation under observation and control is hidden for the
external subject by the horizons of events. Thus the essence of self-management
is in accounting and application of tasks, methods and peculiarities of
individual self-improvement of everyone.
The
essence of self-management is hidden in fundamental laws of the society, bios,
management as a whole. Self-management is an effective way of accounting and
implementation of new realities of transient periods.
Self-management,
in essence, is a specific sphere of phenomenological activity where there are
always some pulsations and uncertainties of human relations as a system of
systems.
The
main purpose of self-management is to maximize the person’s own potential,
self-consciously manage the process of self-education and the flow of his life
(self-determine) and to overcome external circumstances both in educational and
professional space. This goal, according to L.Seiwert, results from the fact
that every person in his life faces the necessity to be capable to transform
the situation characterized by disorder of actions caused by external
circumstances into the situation of designed and achievable goals [1].
According
to V.Tokarev there are five self-management systems: self-control, analysis,
adaptation, rationalization and development of a personality [4].
Self-management
is often presented as a model of seven requirements: the ability to formulate
and implement the goals, personal organization, self-discipline, knowledge of
techniques of personal work, the ability to make yourself healthy, emotionally
strong-willed potential, self-control.
According
to some researchers (L. Seiwert, J. Morgenstern) the solution of various kinds
of daily tasks and challenges in the professional space can be presented as a
variety of functions, which are in a certain relationship and, as a rule, are
carried out in a particular sequence. In the course of educational
self-management taking into account the sequence of performance of particular
functions the scholars have identified six phases: aim setting – analysis and
defining of personal goals, planning – development of plans and alternatives
for educational or professional activity, decision-making on particular
problems, organization and implementation – preparation of the daily routine
and organization of the personal training (labour) process in order to
accomplish the tasks, control – self-control and total control (if necessary –
updating the purposes), information and communication – the phase, which is peculiar,
to a certain extent, to all functions, as both information and communication
exchange are necessary at all phases of self-management.
Knowing
the technologies of self-management allows achieving the educational and
professional goals in the best possible way. For successful promotion of a
specialist in the professional space self-motivation of a person is not less
important.
We can speak about self-motivation only when
it is a person himself who impels himself to it. The authors of the existing
motivation theories – Maslow, Herzberg, Mackeland, Vroom and others
provide tools for understanding ourselves and our own motives, as well as
enable a person to independently monitor the dynamics of his needs and
objectives over the years. Our contemporaries – Reinhard Schrenger (“Motivation
Myths”), Adriaan Beckman (“Self-Management”), Klaus Kobyol (“Motivation in the
Style of Action”), Michaly Chiksentmihay (“Flow: The Psychology of Optimal
Experience”) have focused more attention on the emotional component of
self-motivation.
Self-motivation
is now considered as a part of social intelligence of a person (Illyin E.P.,
Maslow A.). A person is determined by the quickness of his adaptability to a
rapidly changing situation, by the ability of his self-realization in the
society.
At the
time when market requires the individual enterprise, quick thinking,
flexibility, etc., it is self-motivation that becomes a tool for professional
self-promotion and social success.
References:
1.
Çàéâåðò, Ë. Âàøå âðåìÿ –
â Âàøèõ ðóêàõ: (Ñîâåòû äåëîâûì ëþäÿì êàê ýôôåêòèâíî èñïîëüçîâàòü ðàáî÷åå âðåìÿ)
[Òåêñò] /Ë. Çàéâåðò: Ïåð. ñ íåì.// - Ì, : Èíòåðýêñïîðò, Èíôðà – Ì, 1995. – 267
ñ.
2.
Öâûê, Â.À.
Ïðîôåññèîíàëèçàöèÿ êàê ñîöèàëüíûé âîïðîñ [Òåêñò] / Â.À. Öâûê // Âåñòíèê ÐÓÄÍ,
Ñåðèÿ «Ñîöèîëîãèÿ». 2003. - ¹ 4-5. – Ñ. 258-269.
3.
Ìàñëîó, À. Ìîòèâàöèÿ è
ëè÷íîñòü. [Òåêñò] / À. Ìàñëîó // ÑÏÁ.: Ïèòåð, 2003. – 352 ñ.
4.
Òîêàðåâ, Â.
Ïðîôåññèîíàëüíûå íàâûêè ìåíåäæåðà. [ýëåêòðîííûé ðåñóðñ] // http://www.erudition.ru/referat/ref/id.52790_1.html.Copyright, 2003 – 2005 «Ýðóäèöèÿ».
5.
Ìîðãåíøòåðí, Äæ. Òàéì
Ìåíåäæìåíò. Èñêóññòâî ïëàíèðîâàíèÿ è óïðàâëåíèÿ ñâîèì âðåìåíåì è ñâîåé æèçíüþ. [Òåêñò] /Äæ. Ìîðãåíøòåðí // Ì.: ÎÎÎ «Äîáðàÿ
êíèãà», 2001. – 264 ñ.