Ïåäàãîãè÷åñêèå
íàóêè/ 4. Ñòðàòåãè÷åñêèå íàïðàâëåíèÿ ðåôîðìèðîâàíèÿ ñèñòåìû îáðàçîâàíèÿ
Áåëîóñîâà È.Â.
Âîñòî÷íî-Êàçàõñòàíñêèé ãîñóäàðñòâåííûé òåõíè÷åñêèé
óíèâåðñèòåò
èì. Ä. Ñåðèêáàåâà, Êàçàõñòàí
The
Reason the University Students are Seeking for Extra Foreign Language Classes
The cross-cultural communication and
translation centre (CCTC) has been functioning at the East Kazakhstan State
Technical university foreign languages department since 2006, and since 2008
foreign language courses have been conducting regularly. The learners of the
courses are mostly the students of the mentioned university. The number of
people interested in these courses is increasing from term to term. The
university administration fixed a payment for the courses. Thus, the lecturers
are able to get extra pay for extra classes at their workplace.
But the main reason of growing popularity of
the foreign languages courses isn’t the extra profit for teachers. I can speak
about it confidently because I myself have worked at CCTC for three terms. It
is complicated work I should say. Motivated students deserve modern proper
means of learning, i.e. appropriate textbooks, supplementary audio, video, and
reading materials, etc. That is the teachers’ constant concern alongside with
the curriculum and award certificates.
We use “New English File” elementary and
pre-intermediate learning complex, published by Oxford University Press, which
consists of student’s books, workbooks and teacher’s books with audio- and
video- supplement materials as a basic methodological instrument for
elementary, pre-intermediate, and intermediate students. These intensive
training courses are worked out for adult learners and encourage both students
and teachers to work regularly and hard.
The instance that brings students to the
courses and makes teachers carry out a good deal of extra work (they are
overloaded with their direct duties), we think, has the following sources.
First of all, we would like to tell about
shortcomings of school secondary education. Curricula and textbooks alteration
and the much-talked-about Unitary National Testing negatively affect school
students’ knowledge of foreign languages.
A special emphasis should be made on a recent
reform of Kazakhstani higher educational system. After leaving school students
enroll at the university and face the same shortage of foreign languages
classes. Moreover, all the university students are taught together regardless
of being beginners, intermediate or advanced.
Such a situation makes some students look for a way out of it.
When the way out seems to be found, it turns
out to be the right thing in a wrong place. Why? Why don’t we have a relevant
result having motivated students, sufficient course and materials, and
experienced instructors at our disposal?
In our opinion, the students can’t master the
proposed intensive language course due to lack of time. To obtain certain
results, the students are supposed both to participate in group activities, and
to do a good deal of tasks individually at home.
Now we must realize why the students have no
chance to spend their time obtaining knowledge they need. Under a newly
introduced credit system in higher education reality, at our university in
particular, students have 3-5 academic “pairs” per day, approximately, 20 “pairs” per week. In addition to classes within their chosen
specialties, students are required to do a lot of other subjects.
Many classes are
offered only once a week (80 minutes). It is extremely difficult for a teacher
to explore his or her subject deeply in such a limited amount of time.
So, rather than
mourning the loss of their ability to provide a broad education, Kazakhstani
HEIs should seize this as an opportunity to decide which subjects are truly
valuable and which are not, to cut those which are not, and to provide adequate
time (and resources) for those remaining in order to more properly teach them.
Kazakhstan has begun a
new phase of higher education, one that radically departs from the old Soviet
model: a shift to a credit system, one ostensibly based on America’s. However, how much is really known in
Kazakhstan about the American system? What strengths of the old system will be
lost? What current weaknesses could hinder future progress? Can another system
successfully be transplanted into a substantially different culture? Those and
many others similar questions are still food for thought in our society, though
about seven years have already passed since new educational standards were
introduced in 2004 by the Ministry of Education and Science of Kazakhstan. And
from the very beginning there was little if any clarity in the subject. The
Ministry allow universities to realize educational process according to both
the traditional linear or new credit system. So we have on the one hand, the
title and elements of the new, and on the other hand, doubtful habits and
traditions of the old system.
We name the former system traditions
“doubtful”, because under that system it never occurred to higher school
students to seek for additional classes of foreign language. That was for
special textbooks, curriculum, and the amount of academic hours were beyond far
enough to obtain special knowledge for each student.
“Kazakhstan is not
ready to change to an American-style system, and it shouldn’t lose the
advantages of its own education system,” warn many Kazakhstani teachers.
There is a popular
verdict even among younger generation that “maybe it was the best system in
Soviet times.” Best or not, it was certainly respected, and many of the
teachers trained in those times remain in the system today.
The transition to a new system is
likely, at least in the short term, to create confusion, instability for good
teachers and students.
Today we should admit
mournfully, that all the events affect human resource development in this
country.