Kava V.R.

Chernivtsi National University, Ukraine

Adjective And Its Functions In Modern English

 

     In grammar, an adjective is a part of speech that modifies a noun or a pronoun, usually by describing it or making its meaning more specific. The most widely recognized adjectives in English are words such as big, old, and tired that actually describe people, places, or things. Adjectives are words expressing properties of objects (e.g. large, blue, simple, clever, economic, progressive, productive, etc) and, hence, qualifying nouns.

     Unlike adverbs, which often seem capable of popping up almost anywhere in a sentence, adjectives nearly always appear immediately before the noun or noun phrase that they modify. Adjectives in English do not change for number or case. The only grammatical category they have is the degrees of comparison. The degrees of comparison are known as the positive, the comparative, and the superlative. We use the comparative for comparing two things and the superlative for comparing three or more things. The inflected suffixes -er and -est suffice to form most comparatives and superlatives, although we need -ier and -iest when a two-syllable adjective ends in - y (happier and happiest); otherwise we use more and most when an adjective has more than one syllable [1, p. 48].               

       In this paper we analyze adjective and its basic linguistic functions.

Adjective can generally be classified into one of four kinds of uses:

1)                Attributive adjectives are part of the noun phrase headed by the noun they modify; for example, happy is an attributive adjective in "happy people".

2)                 Predicative adjectives are linked via a copula or other linking mechanism to the noun or pronoun they modify; for example, happy is a predicate adjective in "they are happy" and in "that made me happy."

3)               Absolute adjectives do not belong to a larger construction (aside from a larger adjective phrase), and typically modify either the subject of a sentence or whatever noun or pronoun they are closest to; for example, happy is an absolute adjective in "The boy, happy with his lollipop, did not look where he was going."

4)               Substantive adjectives act almost as nouns. One way this can happen is if a noun is elided and an attributive adjective is left behind. In the sentence, "I read two books to them; he preferred the sad book, but she preferred the happy", happy is a substantive adjective, short for "happy one" or "happy book".

     The aim of this paper is to investigate adjectives of size in political discourse.

     The term discourse has several definitions. In the study of language, discourse often refers to the speech patterns and usage of language, dialects, and acceptable statements, within a community. It is a subject of study in peoples who live in secluded areas and share similar speech conventions [3].

      Sociologists and philosophers tend to use the term discourse to describe the conversations and the meaning behind them by a group of people who hold certain ideas in common.

 Having defined the term discourse, we must also give definition for  discourse analysis. It is a general term for a number of approaches to analyzing written, spoken or signed language use.

       Discourse analysis is the branch of linguistics that deals with the study and application of approaches to analyse written, spoken or signed language [3].

      The objects of discourse analysis—discourse, writing, talk, conversation, communicative event.

 There are few types of Discourse Analysis :

1)     Critical discourse analysis -  is an interdisciplinary approach to the study of discourse that views language as a form of social practice and focuses on the ways social and political domination are reproduced by text and talk.

2)   Political discourse analysis -  is a field of discourse analysis which focuses on discourse in political forums (such as debates, speeches, and hearings) as the phenomenon of interest.

       Political discourse is the informal exchange of reasoned views as to which of several alternative courses of action should be taken to solve a societal problem.[3]

         Here are some examples of adjectives of size, that can be used in political discourse.

              “It's time to give all our students the chance to succeed in the new economy by modernizing our schools, setting high standards, and hiring more qualified teachers” [2].

     “Second big problem, the global environment” [2].

     “Most of them, little kids that never get any clean water” [2].

     “And finally global warming; if the climate warms for the next fifty years at the rate of the last ten, we'll lose whole island nations in the Pacific that will be flooded by the rising water table as the South Pole and the North Pole get smaller” [2].

     “Far more terrorist attacks were thwarted at home and around the world than succeeded, large numbers of terrorists who did commit crimes were brought to justice” [2].

“There's no question that quite soon the women in this audience who are in their childbearing years will be able to bring children home from the hospital with little gene cards and life expectancies in excess of ninety years” [2].

“The work will be complete, however, when every school -- every public school in America is a place of high expectations and a place of achievement” [4].

“Those kids have been hurt the worst because people have failed to challenge the soft bigotry of low expectations” [4].

 “Think about how we all organize our lives in little boxes - man, woman, British, American, Muslim, Christian, Jew, Tory, Labour, New Labour, Old Labour, up, down - you know, everything in the world” [4].

“If that happens, it will be the biggest epidemic since the plague killed a quarter of Europe in the fourteenth century” [4].

“And finally, one of the big burdens of the modern world is high tech terrorism - and a lot of people knew it before September 11th”[4].

Thus, the results of the analysis show that adjectives of size are often used in political discourse.

References:

1.     Êàóøàíñêàÿ Â.Ë. Ãðàììàòèêà àíãëèéñêîãî ÿçûêà. Ìîðôîëîãèÿ. Ñèíòàêñèñ. Ì.:2000. – 319ñ.

2.     http://australianpolitics.com/usa/clinton/speeches/

3.      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discourse

4.     http://www.presidentialrhetoric.com/speeches/bush_firstterm.html