Petrova
M. M.
"St. Cyril
and St. Methodius" University of Veliko
Turnovo, Bulgaria
DISTANCE
LEARNING – CHANGING THE WORLD OF EDUCATION
Distance learning is an indisputable fact in the new active
educational and learning circles of the contemporary society. Although still uncertain,
it strengthens its position as a practice in Bulgarian education, too. The
analysis of the existing experience shows that subject of the distance learning
are above all limited in volume and comparatively specialized education courses.
By means of this education mostly peripheral or out of the main education
process problems are solved. Comparatively cautious and incomplete are the
attempts to embrace comprehensive education processes and to distinguish it as
an independent form of education.
Regardless of its
subsequent development, the distance learning practice, which is in process of
establishing in
The first place in
significance we can assign to the myth that distance learning in its essence
does not differ from extramural education. In order to discard this myth we
should note that no matter to what extent extramural education is taken as a
close relative predecessor of distance learning, this close relation cannot
underestimate and not in the least eliminate the principle differences between
the accepted practice and the established standards of extramural education and
the new ideas of distance learning.
The second myth is associated with the simplified interpretation of the
basic organization principles of education work in distance learning. It
oversimplifies and reduces the organization of education in distance learning
to placing the lecture material in the Internet and providing a possibility for
feedback of the student with the tutor. It should be noted that no matter how
great is the importance assigned to videoconference technologies in global
information and communication networks, no matter how high is the estimation of
the possibilities of interactive digital televisions, they are not the main,
and still less the only elements of distance learning. Much more decisive
for distance learning is the organization of the independent cognitive work of
the student in a developed learning environment. Fundamental for the education
process of distance learning is also the independent working communication
between the tutor and the student in an adequate information and communication
network and a suitable education information resource.
The myth, that to perform distance learning computers and
telecommunications are enough, is spread over a very
narrow notion about the equipment and the complete
administration of the learning process. This myth again unreasonably
underestimates the role and significance of the independent cognitive work of
students in the educational-methodological administration of distance learning.
The next myth, that distance learning is considerably weaker and has
less quality compared to the full-time form of education, is an attempt to
transfer a mechanically formed in the past high estimation of full-time
education and a negative estimation of the other forms of education. The
exclusive place of the traditional form of full-time education on the
educational pedestal of quality will
be more and more rivaled by distance learning.
The reasons for this are: the possibilities to attract highly qualified
scientific-pedagogical experts in the field of new information and
communication technologies in order to develop quality and in great circulation
educational-methodological administration; the great intellectual potential of
the education information environment of the distance learning; the high level
of independence in the cognitive activity of students; the rich variety of
assignments (part of them in the field of research); the huge potential for
collective creativity in network environment and videoconference connections; practical
possibility for independent working communication between tutors and students.
In the basis of the fifth myth lies the
groundless assumption of the desire to believe that the Bulgarian education
system has been and inertly continues to be one of the best in the world; and
that with the presentation on the education market of the new service “distance
learning” it will have no problems to integrate on the global market. No matter
what and how good the evaluations of the education in our country are said to
be, they should be related to its history. The expectations for efficient
participation on the international education market are extensively superficial
and are not objectively reasoned. We would rather distinguish reasons and
tendencies for a drain of the traditional contingent of
students in
The marketing research that was carried out on
the education market shows that the necessary reasons exist for scientifically
grounded revision of the education services that are offered by the organized
education in our country. At that revision the highest priority should be given
to the designation of the attractive subject areas and the forms of education
that they can take. In this process of proving the social need for every
education service more and more attention will be directed to distance
learning.
The organized education in
The fast growth of the distance
education branch activates old questions without answers as well as produces a
wide range of new problems at accelerated rates. The
information-communicational globalization for its part increases the need of
creating science-grounded strategy for development of the distance education. A
prior object of this strategy should be the support of high quality on all
educational stages. The need of creating private and shared standards for
distance education is objectified.