The practical recommendations of manager for
determination of duals among the subordinates
ñ.ph.-m.s., as. prof. A.A. Shiyan, as. L.O. Nikiforova, st.V.O. Krulov
Vinnytsya national technical university
Modern
activity on enterprises requires ordered and coordinated joint activity of the
staff. The practice of Management shows that not every employer can work
effectively together with another man. The researches of the economists, sociologists and
psychologists tell that every staff of the firm forms its stable groups of
employers who demonstrate a high economic effectiveness of production activity.
However, the same researches convincingly show that some of the employers are
not simply able to work effectively with the others.
The
main problem of staff Management of today is the problem of determination which
employers can work effectively in pairs, so form dyad. After all, maximally
effective dyad work at reaching the goal not only saves time, but is also a
source of creative ideas and innovative solutions.
To
determine the positive dyad inside the staff it is appropriate to use a
dichotomy reference method. The scheme of the summarizing dichotomy distribution
is shown in Figure 1. As it is shown on the scheme, any person can be described
by using four basic dichotomies each of which having two opposite poles.
The first dichotomy is based on consideration
of the software component of the employer. It is based on the differentiation
between refining and generalizing of information for a person’s software
component unit. Thus, a division into the generalizing (generalizing technology
management) and refining type of employer (refining technology management) is
held. This dichotomy describes how a real object expresses the aim of its
management. It is set, in a certain sense, by contrasting “sign- symbol”.
Figure 1 − The scheme of the
dichotomy distribution
The
second dichotomy defines the direction of the employer’s work. Some types of
employers create the processes, basing on the state. Because of that they are
in a constant "creative process", they are in a constant contact with
the objects, which they implement their management.
Naturally,
they are in “creative process” till they held a control over them. Such types
of employers are called participants. The other workers create the state being
programmed by the process. These types of employers are called observers. So,
this dichotomy divides the employers on participants and observers. It is set,
in a certain sense, by contrasting “process- state” (or “static-dynamic”).
The
third dichotomy determines if the real objects are used in management, or it is
described in the terms of many individual real objects. The employment that is
described only in the single real objects, such types of workers are called
object-oriented. Opposing types of workers are called communication-oriented.
This dichotomy is set by contrasting “one –many” or “object-subject”.
The
fourth dichotomy determines if the structure of all hierarchical levels (structure
of any combination of objects) is used in management, or management is
described in the terms of the border hierarchical level as a whole thing. In
the first case such type of the employers is called identification. In the
second case it is called differentiating. This dichotomy is opposed
“identity-difference”.
The
special working out the rules of asking and the method of the direct interview
are used in applying the method of successive dichotomy reference. After
decoding the date by the respondent the expert determines the poles of the
dichotomy distribution on the basis of the results for a concrete employer. The
Manager, knowing the sequence of the dichotomy poles, can determine the type of
employer and create a positive dyad among his subordinates with help the 1st
and the 2nd lists.
List 1 − The type of worker based on dichotomy distribution
Poles of dichotomies |
Type of worker |
Generalizing, Participant, Communication-oriented, Identification |
<Ñò-Ñ|Çâ-Ä> |
Generalizing,
Observer, Object-oriented, Identification |
<Ñò-Ñ|Îá-Ä> |
Generalizing, Observer,
Communication-oriented, Identification |
<Ñò-Ä|Çâ-Ñ> |
Generalizing, Observer, Object-oriented, Identification |
<Ñò-Ä|Îá-Ñ> |
Generalizing, Participant, Communication-oriented,
Differentiating |
<Ãð-Ñ|Çâ-Ä> |
Generalizing, Participant, Object-oriented, Differentiating |
<Ãð-Ñ|Îá-Ä> |
Generalizing, Observer, Communication-oriented,
Differentiating |
<Ãð-Ä|Çâ-Ñ> |
Generalizing, Observer, Object-oriented, Differentiating |
<Ãð-Ä|Îá-Ñ> |
Refining, Participant, Object-oriented, Identification |
<Îá-Ñ|Ñò-Ä> |
Refining, Participant, Object-oriented, Differentiating |
<Îá-Ñ|Ãð-Ä> |
Refining, Observer, Object-oriented, Identification |
<Îá-Ä|Ñò-Ñ> |
Refining, Observer, Object-oriented, Differentiating |
<Îá-Ä|Ãð-Ñ> |
Refining, Participant, Communication-oriented,
Identification |
<Çâ-Ñ|Ñò-Ä> |
Refining, Participant, Communication-oriented,
Differentiating |
<Çâ-Ñ|Ãð-Ä> |
Refining, Observer, Communication-oriented, Identification |
<Çâ-Ä|Ñò-Ñ> |
Refining, Observer, Communication-oriented, Differentiating |
<Çâ-Ä|Ãð-Ñ> |
List 2 − The
positive dyads for effective economic activity
¹ |
Positive dyads |
¹ |
Positive dyads |
||
1 |
<Ñò-Ñ|Çâ-Ä> |
<Ãð-Ä|Îá-Ñ> |
5 |
<Îá-Ñ|Ñò-Ä> |
<Çâ-Ä|Ãð-Ñ> |
2 |
<Ñò-Ñ|Îá-Ä> |
<Ãð-Ä|Çâ-Ñ> |
6 |
<Îá-Ñ|Ãð-Ä> |
<Çâ-Ä|Ñò-Ñ> |
3 |
<Ñò-Ä|Çâ-Ñ> |
<Ãð-Ñ|Îá-Ä> |
7 |
<Îá-Ä|Ñò-Ñ> |
<Çâ-Ñ|Ãð-Ä> |
4 |
<Ñò-Ä|Îá-Ñ> |
<Ãð-Ñ|Çâ-Ä> |
8 |
<Îá-Ä|Ãð-Ñ> |
<Çâ-Ñ|Ñò-Ä> |
Thus in this work the method of creation of positive
dyad is described for effective joint economic activity in general case.
1.
Shiyan
A.A. Informative space and classification of strategies of administrative activity
in a game and making decisions // Information
technologies and computer engineering. – 2007. – ¹ 3(10). – P.131-139.
2.
Shiyan
A.A., Nikiforova L.O. the Game-theoretical model of evaluation of efficiency of
the work of manager // Economy: problems of theory and practice are Dnipropetrovsk:
Publishing house DNU, 2009 – ¹ 247 – P.366-372.
3.
Shiyan
A.A. the Game-theoretical analysis of rational conduct of man and making
decision in a management of the socially economic systems. Monograph. –
Material is accessible on a web site http://www.soctech.narod.ru