The practical recommendations of manager for

determination of duals among the subordinates

 

ñ.ph.-m.s.,  as. prof. A.A. Shiyan, as. L.O. Nikiforova, st.V.O. Krulov

  Vinnytsya national technical university

 

Modern activity on enterprises requires ordered and coordinated joint activity of the staff. The practice of Management shows that not every employer can work effectively together with another man. The researches of the economists, sociologists and psychologists tell that every staff of the firm forms its stable groups of employers who demonstrate a high economic effectiveness of production activity. However, the same researches convincingly show that some of the employers are not simply able to work effectively with the others.

The main problem of staff Management of today is the problem of determination which employers can work effectively in pairs, so form dyad. After all, maximally effective dyad work at reaching the goal not only saves time, but is also a source of creative ideas and innovative solutions.

To determine the positive dyad inside the staff it is appropriate to use a dichotomy reference method. The scheme of the summarizing dichotomy distribution is shown in Figure 1. As it is shown on the scheme, any person can be described by using four basic dichotomies each of which having two opposite poles.

 The first dichotomy is based on consideration of the software component of the employer. It is based on the differentiation between refining and generalizing of information for a person’s software component unit. Thus, a division into the generalizing (generalizing technology management) and refining type of employer (refining technology management) is held. This dichotomy describes how a real object expresses the aim of its management. It is set, in a certain sense, by contrasting “sign- symbol”.

 

Figure 1 − The scheme of the dichotomy distribution

 

The second dichotomy defines the direction of the employer’s work. Some types of employers create the processes, basing on the state. Because of that they are in a constant "creative process", they are in a constant contact with the objects, which they implement their management.

Naturally, they are in “creative process” till they held a control over them. Such types of employers are called participants. The other workers create the state being programmed by the process. These types of employers are called observers. So, this dichotomy divides the employers on participants and observers. It is set, in a certain sense, by contrasting “process- state” (or “static-dynamic”).

The third dichotomy determines if the real objects are used in management, or it is described in the terms of many individual real objects. The employment that is described only in the single real objects, such types of workers are called object-oriented. Opposing types of workers are called communication-oriented. This dichotomy is set by contrasting “one –many” or “object-subject”.

The fourth dichotomy determines if the structure of all hierarchical levels (structure of any combination of objects) is used in management, or management is described in the terms of the border hierarchical level as a whole thing. In the first case such type of the employers is called identification. In the second case it is called differentiating. This dichotomy is opposed “identity-difference”.

The special working out the rules of asking and the method of the direct interview are used in applying the method of successive dichotomy reference. After decoding the date by the respondent the expert determines the poles of the dichotomy distribution on the basis of the results for a concrete employer. The Manager, knowing the sequence of the dichotomy poles, can determine the type of employer and create a positive dyad among his subordinates with help the 1st and the 2nd lists.

 

List 1The type of worker based on dichotomy distribution

Poles of dichotomies

Type of worker

Generalizing, Participant, Communication-oriented, Identification

<Ñò-Ñ|Çâ-Ä>

Generalizing, Observer, Object-oriented, Identification

<Ñò-Ñ|Îá-Ä> 

Generalizing, Observer, Communication-oriented, Identification

<Ñò-Ä|Çâ-Ñ> 

Generalizing, Observer, Object-oriented, Identification

<Ñò-Ä|Îá-Ñ>

Generalizing, Participant, Communication-oriented, Differentiating

<Ãð-Ñ|Çâ-Ä> 

Generalizing, Participant, Object-oriented, Differentiating

<Ãð-Ñ|Îá-Ä> 

Generalizing, Observer, Communication-oriented, Differentiating

<Ãð-Ä|Çâ-Ñ> 

Generalizing, Observer, Object-oriented, Differentiating

<Ãð-Ä|Îá-Ñ>

Refining, Participant, Object-oriented, Identification

<Îá-Ñ|Ñò-Ä> 

Refining, Participant, Object-oriented, Differentiating

<Îá-Ñ|Ãð-Ä> 

Refining, Observer, Object-oriented, Identification

<Îá-Ä|Ñò-Ñ> 

Refining, Observer, Object-oriented, Differentiating

<Îá-Ä|Ãð-Ñ>

Refining, Participant, Communication-oriented, Identification

<Çâ-Ñ|Ñò-Ä> 

Refining, Participant, Communication-oriented, Differentiating

<Çâ-Ñ|Ãð-Ä> 

Refining, Observer, Communication-oriented, Identification

<Çâ-Ä|Ñò-Ñ> 

Refining, Observer, Communication-oriented, Differentiating

<Çâ-Ä|Ãð-Ñ>

 

List 2 − The positive dyads for effective economic activity

¹

Positive dyads

¹

Positive dyads

1

<Ñò-Ñ|Çâ-Ä>

<Ãð-Ä|Îá-Ñ>

5

<Îá-Ñ|Ñò-Ä> 

<Çâ-Ä|Ãð-Ñ>

2

<Ñò-Ñ|Îá-Ä>

<Ãð-Ä|Çâ-Ñ>

6

<Îá-Ñ|Ãð-Ä> 

<Çâ-Ä|Ñò-Ñ> 

3

<Ñò-Ä|Çâ-Ñ>

<Ãð-Ñ|Îá-Ä>

7

<Îá-Ä|Ñò-Ñ> 

<Çâ-Ñ|Ãð-Ä> 

4

<Ñò-Ä|Îá-Ñ>

<Ãð-Ñ|Çâ-Ä>

8

<Îá-Ä|Ãð-Ñ>

<Çâ-Ñ|Ñò-Ä> 

 

Thus in this work the method of creation of positive dyad is described for effective joint economic activity in general case.

 

Literature

1.    Shiyan A.A. Informative space and classification of strategies of administrative activity in a game and making decisions // Information technologies and computer engineering. – 2007. – ¹ 3(10). – P.131-139.

2.    Shiyan A.A., Nikiforova L.O. the Game-theoretical model of evaluation of efficiency of the work of manager // Economy: problems of theory and practice are Dnipropetrovsk: Publishing house DNU, 2009 – ¹ 247 – P.366-372.

3.    Shiyan A.A. the Game-theoretical analysis of rational conduct of man and making decision in a management of the socially economic systems. Monograph. – Material is accessible on a web site http://www.soctech.narod.ru