VIII
Ìåæäóíàðîäíàÿ
íàó÷íî-ïðàêòè÷åñêàÿ êîíôåðåíöèÿ
«Ýôôåêòèâíûå èíñòðóìåíòû ñîâðåìåííûõ íàóê»
27
àïðåëÿ – 05 ìàÿ 2012 ã. ×åõèÿ
Ñåêöèÿ:
Ýêîíîìè÷åñêèå íàóêè/ 3. Ôèíàíñîâûå îòíîøåíèÿ.
Post
graduate student Mogylko L.V.
Kyiv
National Taras Shevchenko University, Ukraine
Tontine as a
historical form of government borrowing
The existence of the state is
inextricably linked to its
financial activities and participation in credit relations.
Virtually every state periodically
has budget deficit. That’s why, government borrowings are carried out,
providing timely coverage of budget deficits and
full implementation of main state functions.
The study of historical aspects
of the development of government borrowing revealed that one of the first forms of government borrowing is tontine.
A tontine is an investment scheme for raising capital,
devised in the 17th century and relatively widespread in the 18th and 19th. It
combines features of a group annuity and a lottery.
Each subscriber pays an agreed sum into the fund, and thereafter receives an
annuity. As members die, their shares devolve to the other participants, and so
the value of each annuity increases. On the death of the last member, the
scheme is wound up. In a variant,
which has provided the plot device for most fictional versions, on the death of
the penultimate member the capital passes to the last survivor.
The word ‘tontine’ is derived from the name of Neapolitan banker Lorenzo de Tonti. He
proposed the original tontine to Jules Cardinal Mazarin in the early 1650's as a
means for French King Louis XIV to raise revenue. The French treasury, battered
by the Thirty Years War and the rebellions within France known as the ‘Fronde’,
needed to raise money. The tontine scheme reputedly evolved from similar
offerings in Italy, albeit on a smaller scale, to raise income from a broad
spectrum of the population. As envisioned by de Tonti, tontine subscribers
would buy a special kind of annuity at 300 livres a share. Investors could name a third party, often
referred to as the nominee, as the life in interest for their stake in the
tontine. Participation was structured in groups of equal size according to the
age of the nominees: e.g. 0 to 7, 8 to 14, all the way through the age of 63.7. Each beneficiary was to receive
an annual payment based on the interest earned by the combined initial capital contributed
of investors in the applicable age cohort. The rate of interest increased with
the age of the nominee. As nominees died, the share related to that nominee
became worthless and the payments based on each of other surviving nominees
would increase. The subscriber represented by the last nominee in each group would get all the interest generated
by the capital within that band.
On the death of the last subscriber, the capital would revert to the
government.
The first operating tontine was established by the city of Kampen in Holland in October, 1670. The cities of Amsterdam and
Groningen followed within the same year. There were almost 200 local Dutch
tontines offered by 1700. City-States
in a still un-unified Germany followed suit. While de Tonti’s original proposal
had royal support, it was not registered by the Parlement of
Paris, a court-like institution, which had the effect of killing
the proposal. Undeterred, de Tonti continued to press his tontine idea and
various other grand schemes such as a national lottery. At some point, de Tonti
offended someone in power. French Finance Minister Jean-Baptiste Colbert, the
successor to Mazarin as de facto Prime Minister of France, possibly issued the 1668 royal warrant which sent de Tonti
to the Bastille. He remained there until he was released in 1675. Unfortunately, de Tonti died
around 1684, five years before the first French national tontine was finally
created in 1689. An additional
nine French national tontines were created at irregular intervals through 1759. The later French tontines tended
to be fully subscribed [2].
The British experiment with tontines, in contrast to France, was rockier.
The English established seven tontines between 1693 and 1789. One tontine
offering, in 1757, was cancelled due to a lack of subscriptions. Ultimately,
only the three tontines established by the Irish parliament, in 1773, 1775, and
1777, were fully subscribed. Even the tontine initiated in 1777 was not completely
‘issued’ until 1781.
The later European national tontines appealed to speculators, who formed
syndicates in attempts to make the payouts last as long as possible for the
participants. Geneva, in particular, was the site of ingenious schemes by
investors who paid much more attention to the life-expectancies of nominees
than the tontine issuing governments of France or the United Kingdom. One group
of Genevan speculators formed investment ‘clubs’ for the 1777 Irish Tontine and
sought out the guidance of a doctor who helped the investors identify a number
of local families with particularly long life expectancies. The Genevan clubs
invested 50,000 in the issue. The fate of the clubs investment was tied to the
life expectancies of 50 girls, ranging in age from three to seven years old,
identified by the doctor. The overall tontine offering was comprised of three
classes of nominees: those under twenty years old, twenty to forty, and forty
and above. Forty years later, 64% of the youngest group of Genevan women was
still alive, compared to only 42% of the under-twenty class for the tontine at
large.
A tontine was also one of the options proposed by U.S. Treasury Secretary
Alexander Hamilton as a means to reduce the national debt at the beginning of
the American Republic. Hamilton’s tontine was roughly modeled on the 1789
British version and incorporated an unusual payout structure which froze
investor payments to the final beneficiaries at the level reached when the
survivor pool was reduced to 20 % of the original group. These beneficiaries
would still receive a dividend, but it would no longer increase as their
co-beneficiaries died off. Hamilton's tontine proposal, one of several elements
of a multipronged approach to tackling America's financial problems, was
ignored by Congress. The administration of tontines was a headache in a quill
and paper environment. Documentation of identity and death was a constant problem
in a world where records of such information were nonstandard and scattered.
Forgery of documents, intended to maintain the flow of income to the agents of
a dead person, was a common problem. Other aspects of tontine administration
would ultimately prove successful. The information gathered to administer the
tontines created some of the first truly reliable data in the development of
modem mortality tables. Unreliable actuarial tables led early tontine promoters
to persistently underestimate nominees’ life expectancies. The gradual increase
in the average lifespan during this period may have also worked to undercut the
accuracy of the tontine promoters' math [1, p. 492 – 496].
By the end of the 18th century, the tontine had fallen
out of favour as a revenue-raising instrument with governments, but
smaller-scale and less formal tontines continued to be arranged between
individuals or to raise funds for specific projects throughout the 19th
century, and, in modified form, to the present day.
The principle of the tontine, which is applicable
throughout the world, appears straightforward: members join forces to create a
kitty for their contributions and each person in turn receives the money
collected. Study of the tontine auctions show that the way it works can be very
complex and sophisticated since its reliability depends on both rigorous financial
management and an unfailing collective organization.
Tontines are used almost everywhere in the world. In
general, tontines consist of a group of people who are co-opted and who meet up
periodically to exchange goods, services or money. In Africa, a tontine is
extremely common, facilitating a friendly exchange of goods in kind, meals,
mutual aid to help build a roof or cultivate a field, and so on. In Europe,
even though it does not go by the same name, one can also find tontines of
goods in kind: for example, we ‘contribute’ throughout our working lives to
farewell retirement drinks parties of others until the day comes for us to host
our own party. As far as the exchange of money is concerned, the principle is
simple: members make contributions of money into a communal fund, and each
person, in turn, receives the money which has been collected. Sometimes, the
president of the tontine has to make a decision when consensus has not been
reached as to whose turn it is to collect the money. The Chinese resolve this
issue by each person making an offer for the amount in a sealed envelope [3, p.
2].
Also, in England and America the idea about tontine was chiefly utilized
as a method of raising money for public buildings and hotels. In this case the
property was held intact and ultimately divided among certain nominated
survivors. The Tontine Coffee House, in New York, at Wall and Pearl Streets,
was financed on this basis. These enterprises also usually failed of complete
success. Toward the close the eighteenth century there was no more odious word
in Europe than Tontine.
So, tontine is an investment
scheme through which shareholders
derive some form of profit or benefit while they are
living, but the value
of each share devolves to the other participants and not
the shareholder's heirs on the death of each shareholder. In an era in which the range of retirement schemes is
matched only by the uncertainty of the returns, the virtual guaranty of growth
in a tontine is also attractive as long as the reasons for the growth are not
found obnoxious.
REFERENCES
1. A Short History of Tontines by Kent McKeever // Fordham Journal of
Corporate &Financial Law, 2009 – Volume 15, Issue 2, article 5, pp. 491 –
521. [Electronic resource] – Available: http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1108&context=jcfl&sei-redir=1#search=%22fordham%20tontines%22.
– Name from the screen.
2. The Story of Life Insurance by Burton J.
Hendrick // Chapter IV The Great Tontine Gamble / McClure's
Magazine, Volume 27,
August 1906, pp. 401 – 412 http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Story_of_Life_Insurance/Chapter_IV. –
Name from the screen.
3. Using Tontines to Run the Economy by Alain HENRY // French development
agency, June 19th, 2003, p. 11. [Electronic resource]. – Available: http://ecole.org/seminaires/FS3/SEM105/VC190603-ENG.pdf.
– Name from the screen.