A candidate for
PhD degree B.Tulegenova
A candidate for
PhD degree M.Korban
Girne American University, North Cyprus
Using Repertory Grid
technique to form a list of specialties reflecting personal professional
aspirations of prospective applicants
Abstract
The
most common method of acquisition the knowledge from domain experts has been
via interview. However, deeper knowledge can be elicited by using repertory
grid method. Repertory grids technique, introduced by American psychologist
George Kelli, based on the theory of personal constructs, which explain the
ways how people builds their worldview in their own terms. In this paper we
describe an efficient way to aid and guide an applicant to choose right profession.
This involves analysis of the process of interviewing individuals that depends
on the psychological relationship between the interests and capabilities of
prospective students. This study aims to identify the factors influencing the
choice of specialty, generation a report based on mathematical algorithms,
which involve a list of hierarchical classification of more appropriate
specialties.
Key words
repertory
grid technique, indirect knowledge elicitation, personal constructs theory,
cluster analysis
Introduction
Nowadays, among the many critical issues of socio-economic development
of the country one of the most important is the problem of training highly
qualified professionals in this fast-changing environment. Mostly students have
chosen a specialty that does not meet their interests and their capabilities,
cannot fully realize themselves in professional activities. Nature of the
problem is that each freshman faces the problem of choosing the most
appropriate specialty. It is very important to be honest and to develop
realistic aspirations for future life in the profession. A lot of career tests
and quizzes are presented on different web sites. Unfortunately, they do not
provide information about what kind of methods were used and how the results
were formed.
Repertory
grids have been applied to a wide variety of domains, usually aimed at various
kinds of heuristic classification. Their general applicability makes them very
attractive in knowledge elicitation. The purpose of the paper is to produce a
list of individual hierarchical classification of appropriate specialty based
on mathematical algorithm which gives opportunity to be successful in future
profession.
Methods and techniques to solve the problem
Repertory grid analysis is a technique adapted from a psychological
theory of human cognition, personal constructs theory [1].
Techniques, termed indirect knowledge elicitation techniques, have been
effectively applied in various spheres of human activity. This technique is
used in situations where it is difficult to articulate knowledge in response to
direct questions. It is also widely used in information technologies, for
example to identify classification dimensions, user interface requirements, and
decision-making criteria.
Repertory grid analysis was selected because it represented as well-researched
method which has been proven to be effective in the elicitation of implicit,
intuitive knowledge [3], and because it provides a rich source of data for
other analysis.
Moreover it is easy to use, and the complex statistical software
required for their application is readily available.
Data obtained by repertory grid analysis can be used directly, or can be
further analyzed to reveal relationships and structures that might exist among the
items (such as causal relationships), or can be a source of data for other
indirect techniques [2]. For further analysis of the repertory grid matrix
correlation and cluster analysis have been applied.
Data Collection and experimental
study
The data collection
process began with a brief interview in order to inform the teachers about the
purpose of the project and to establish rapport. To identify the knowledge of
teachers, the triadic methodology is used, where personal constructs are
elicited by asking simple questions about similarities and differences between
domain elements. The domain experts must be familiar enough with the selected
elements so that they can readily answer questions. From these procedures the
larger internal representations can be constructed. Attributes elicited from
the teachers were combined and list of questions were constructed. This process
yielded a total of 25 questions relevant presented specialties.
Students participating
in the experiment answered the prepared questions.
Usually, repertory grid
is a matrix that is filled during the interview. In our case, the matrix is
filled by the student in dialogue with the computer. Columns of the matrix
correspond to a certain group of elements - specialties. The rows of the matrix
represent constructs - bipolar symptoms, parameters, scale and the like.
In the process of
filling the repertory grid to assess student needs to estimate of each
construct and in dialogue with a computer associate elements of the construct.
There are two types of repertory grid data: the initial elicited constructs and
the ratings of each entity along each constructs. The filled-in grid matrix
represented another source of data. Grid gives the mathematical basis for
analysis of relations between the constructs of the student, allows study in
detail the individual subsystems of constructs, observe the specific structure
of knowledge and attitudes of the student on the content proposed for the study
specialties.
Findings were recorded
on a portable computer. In the context of the project, the use of existing
software was preferred, in part because it was faster and in part because it
did not require subject training.
Limitations
While the initial phase
of repertory grid analysis (the elicitation of entity differences and
similarities) was very productive, the next phase (filling in the grid) proved
to be difficult [2].
Many applicants did not
fill in all attributes for their elements, so the matrix size was different for
each of them. This missing data limited the number of statistical techniques
that could be applied to the filled-in grid, e.g., principal components
analysis and multiple regressions.
Conclusion
The study was conducted in the domain of right
specialty choosing and the objective was to study about trends development of
the motives of choice of profession, and creating a platform with clear and
simple conceptual definitions which can manage choosing process more
effectively.
The key point is using the effective knowledge
elicitation technique: repertory grid analysis. The repertory grid method is
powerful in obtaining the data, is easy to apply in the field, and well
structured for the post-analysis and result interpretation. Analysis also
appears to be more effective in constructs elicitation than direct interviewing
techniques [4,5].
Overall, these findings have significant implications
for each applicant and can be applied to other Educational Institutions.
References
1.
Kelly G. (1955). The Psychology of
Personal Constructs. New York: Norton.
2. Hudlicka E. (1996). Requirements Elicitation with Indirect Knowledge
Elicitation Techniques: Comparison of Three Methods, GTE Laboratories.
3. Olson, J.R. and Biolsi, K. (1990). Techniques for Representing Expert
Knowledge. University of ]Michigan Cognitive Science and Machine Intelligence
Laboratory Technical Report 34. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan.
4. Geiwitz, I., Klatzky, R.L.. and McCloskey, B.P. (1988). Knowledge Acquisition
Techniques for Expert Systems: Conceptual and Empirical Comparisons. Santa
Barbara, CA: Anacapa Sciences, Inc.
5. Hudlicka, E., and Huggins. A.W.F. (1983). Application of Cognitive
Science Techniques for Developing FAA, Inspection Indicators. BBN Technical
Report No. 7940. Cambridge, UA: BBN. Inc.