Lavrinenko O.V., Candidate of Jurisprudence,
Senior Lecturer, Donetsk Legal Institute of Lugansk State University of
Internal Affairs of E.A. Didorenko
Branch Principle of Restriction of Sphere of
Legal Regulation by Relations of Wage Labour and Feature of its Realisation in
Sphere of Labour Activity of Workers of the State Law Enforcement Bodies of Ukraine
Results spent by the author of the given publication of
researches [1-5] became the basis for
following conclusions and generalisations. The relations developing in labour
collective of law-enforcement body (IAB), is a sphere of action of norms of the labour law, the others are
complex institute and are regulated by norms labour, administrative and other
branches of the law. Hence, as a whole it is wrongful to name labour relations
of employees of bodies IAB of Ukraine only «labour», it is necessary to reflect and an
administrative, imperious element which objectively is present at passage of
public service by the last. Here the term «service-labour
relations» as worker IAB is the representative of the government and consequently, and the subject
of imperious relations, developing in the course of realisation of its labour
function therefore is more comprehensible. It is necessary to note, what
exactly the similar terminological approach is used by many authors in
scientific works, there is it and in process of working out and acceptance of norms of the law (in particular, the item
22 Positions about service by persons of ordinary and commanding structure of
law-enforcement bodies of Ukraine). Application in a science in the given
context of such special terms as «raboche-office activity», «state-office
relations», «service-labour
relations», «office relations, activity», «office relations», also, undoubtedly,
specifies in specificity of such relations, but does not display to the full
available difficult legal nature, specificity of structure and features of the
maintenance of labour relations of workers (employees) IAB Ukraine, and in some cases
contains also tautology signs. Considering stated, it is impossible
completely will agree with a position of researchers which categorically deny
the thesis about an accessory of persons of ordinary and commanding structure IAB to a category of hired
workers. It is thought, that such conclusion demands the additional argument
and specification (for example, taking into account character and a contract
essence as basis of occurrence of such relations), taking into consideration
the developed tendency of «expansion» of the labour law, circle expansions subject
structure legal
relations which are regulated by its norms, process of harmonisation
interbranch conceptual device, and also the ripened reform of sights of
researchers on questions on the concept and sphere of action of the labour
legislation.
The basic direction of the further development of the
special norms regulating service-labour relations of workers IAB, consists in elimination
of contradictions in legal regulation of conditions of their work, an establishment
of additional legal guarantees and privileges, mainly, on the basis of the
labour legislation of the Ukraine adapted taking into account specificity of
service to real working conditions of the specified category of workers.
Special norms which regulate service-labour relations of workers IAB, it is possible to
subdivide on two basic groups. The first group are the legal instructions
completely reproducing the general norms of the labour legislation (about
duration of the working day, an order of granting of weekly days of rest and
holidays, principles of payment and methods of strengthening of discipline of
work, guarantee and compensatory payments, privileges for women, etc.). The
second group is made by the norms following from the general norms of the
labour legislation, but having certain specific features with reference to
character and working conditions of workers IAB. These norms can be
subdivided into following three versions: norms-withdrawals, norms-additions
and norms-adaptations. To norms-withdrawals, for example, it is possible to
carry legal statuses about longer trial period and special requirements to the
candidate at receipt on service. Norms-additions are as though norms-companions
of the general legal instructions fixed in the labour legislation, in particular, it is
possible to carry the norms establishing additional social privileges for
workers IAB to
this group. At last, norms-adaptations are legal instructions which adapt the
general norm, the maintenance of the general rule of behaviour to certain
conditions, and grow out of such process (an example of such norm – the
legal instructions regulating an operating mode). At the same time, the
resulted system of special norms could look is more simplified. After all
elements of the first group represent the legal instructions actually
completely reproducing general provisions of the labour legislation though, as
a matter of fact, they obviously do not concern special norms as to the rules
of behaviour containing more detailed instructions in comparison with the
general norms, more full considering features of the public relations,
displaying an originality of conditions and the maintenance of work of workers IAB, individualising the
general norms. It is thought, that in the given cases the edition of the
Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine of a various sort of departmental
certificates unduly and conducts to their artificial increase. Moreover, such «substitution»
leads to formation at workers IAB of legal nihilism and is false focuses them that a legal basis of
activity of services and divisions, regulations of service-labour relations of
workers IAB
are only departmental orders, instructions, manuals, instructions, instead of
laws and certificates accepted on their
basis of the supreme bodies of the power and management.
Considering an abundance of special statutory acts, a number of authors
unreasonably transfer a standard regulation of work of employees from «labour»
sphere in «administrative», «office». The mechanical statement in departmental
certificates of the general legal statuses of the current legislation about
work which contain in the Code of laws on work of Ukraine and other laws is
represented inexpedient. A number of scientists fairly notice, that the basic
form of action of sources of the labour law – their general action. In
order to avoid collisions in the labour code it is expedient to fix the general
rule about inadmissibility of inclusion of the norms regulating labour
relations, in other laws, except cases when it is directly provided in the most
labour code.
Literature
1. Лавріненко О.В. Феномен єдності і диференціації в системі
правового регулювання соціально–трудових відносин: філософсько–правові та
теоретико–методологічні аспекти //
Південноукраїнський правничий часопис. – 2009. – №1. – С.
104–113.
2. Лавріненко
О.В. Принцип єдності й
диференціації правового регулювання соціально–трудових відносин у системі
галузевих принципів трудового права України:
монографія. – Донецьк: Донецький юридичний інститут ЛДУВС ім. Е.О. Дідоренка,
2010. – 358 с.
3. Лавриненко О.В. Понятие и виды дифференциации правового регулирования социально–трудовых
отношений (вопросы теории) // Известия Гомельского государственного
университета имени Франциска Скорины. – 2010. – №1. – С.
70–75.
4. Лавріненко О.В. Спеціальні норми як засоби реалізації принципу єдності й диференціації
правового регулювання трудових відносин (дискусійні питання теорії) // Вісник Луганського
державного університету внутрішніх справ ім. Е.О. Дідоренка. –
2010. – Вип. 2. – С. 189–198.
5. Лавриненко
О.В. Проблемы терминизации средств,
уровни и сферы реализации принципа единства и дифференциации правового
регулирования трудовых отношений [Електронний ресурс] // Форум
права. – 2010. – №4. – С. 559–565. – Режим доступу:
http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/e–journals/FP/2010–4/10lovrto.pdf.