Ýêîíîìè÷åñêèå íàóêè/2. Ôèíàíñû è áàíêîâñêîå äåëî
2.Âíåøíåýêîíîìè÷åñêàÿ äåÿòåëüíîñòü.
Raspopova V., Kigel M.
Donetsk
National University of Economy and Trade, Ukraine
Competing
in the global economy:
The innovation challenge for Ukraine
One of the most fundamental
trends in the world economy over the last decades has been the accelerating rate of innovation and change,
driven by intensified global competition in many product and service markets.
Global competition is increasing as a result of trade liberalization,
technological change and reductions in transport and communication costs. All
businesses will find it increasingly difficult to compete on low costs alone in
labour intensive industries as well as in high-tech exposed to international
competition. The challenge for businesses is to compete on the basis of unique
value. Overall innovation performance appears to be, at best, average compared
to major competitors of highly developed countries. This is reflected in the
large productivity gap which exists between the developing and developed
countries. Innovation performance accounts for a significant proportion of this
gap. On the whole, firms face a challenge: how to raise their rate of
innovation?
Innovation
is a complex process so understanding why a country has a relatively modest
innovation performance and why it is not straightforward is important. This
report draws on a review of the international innovation literature. As a
result seven critical success factors for innovation have been identified:
• sources of new technological knowledge;
• capacity to absorb and exploit new
knowledge;
• access to finance;
• competition and entrepreneurship;
• customers and suppliers;
• the Regulatory environment;
• networks and collaboration.
In this
report we pursue the task to create a basic theoretical framework for Ukrainian
innovation model. The main objective is to investigate preconditions formed and
those spheres or economy sectors that are most inclined for introducing
innovations.
For
this purpose we have used experience of the United Kingdom (UK), the USA and
Canada. Thus basing the researches on borrowing tried and tested experience
excludes us from common hurdles.
Examination
of Ukrainian Environment for Innovations: Is It Ready or Not?
In the
prospect of development we should allude to "The strategy of Economic and
Social Development of Ukraine for 2004 – 2015. On the way to European
Integration" prepared and published in 2001.
Ukraine
is not doing well in promoting innovations. Partially this evidence accounts
for law budget expenditures on R&D. Table 1 examines this trend.
Name of a region |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
Finland |
1.21 |
1.79 |
1.94 |
2.2 |
Germany |
1.57 |
1.7 |
1.76 |
1.75 |
France |
1.34 |
1.38 |
1.37 |
1.37 |
UK |
1.17 |
1.19 |
1.23 |
1.24 |
EU
average |
1.14 |
1.19 |
1.22 |
1.24 |
Ukraine |
0.53 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0,79 |
Although
systematic data is lacking, it appears Ukraine is lagging behind other
countries in the level of expenditures and imbedding innovations as a
consequence. Economic and social processes in 1991 – 2007 are noted for radical
changes in all systems that had to correspond to intentions of the newly
created state.
Economic
development in 2000 – 2007 has been based mainly on extensive factors. Now most
of them are exhausted. This means the current situation doesn't assure the
primary objective – stable economic growth and decrease of the gap in GDP
between Ukraine and western countries.
In the
situation formed one has to take a catch-up strategy that would guarantee at
least 6 – 7% growth of GDP. The world practice shows that such level of growth
is possible only under a structural and innovation based model of economic
growth, intensive technical and technological production upgrade.
Thus
the basis of the strategic course has to become state policy aimed at providing
innovation model of structural re-building. It is common knowledge Ukraine has
a strong indigenous knowledge source available to business through the Science,
Engineering and Technology (SET).
Ukraine
can occupy a worthy seat in Europe under circumstances of mastering innovation
driven-model of development. It is the only way to secure substantial
competitiveness of Ukrainian economy, alter the resource orientated development
factor which is being formed now. The development of innovation economic model
is not a task of only economic policy. We should speak about organic takeover
of political, humanitarian, social and psychological, macro and microeconomic
factors by the very idea of innovation development.
Real
success of transformation changes is possible only if reforms and consequences
comply with interests of the majority of economic agents. This will give
sensible public support. Therefore in order to implement the strategy for the
next decade Ukraine is under the pressing need of strongly integrated political
consensus, joint consolidation and agreement upon the main objectives of the
strategy and its tools for carrying out the bases.
Innovation
in this report is defined as the successful exploitation of new ideas. Ideas
may be entirely new to the market or involve the application of existing ideas
that are new to the innovating organization or often a combination of both.
Innovation involves the creation of new designs, concepts and ways of doing
things, their commercial exploitation, and subsequent diffusion through the
rest of the economy and society. It is this last – diffusion – phase from which
the bulk of the economic benefits flow. Most innovations are incremental – a
succession of individually modest improvements to products or services over
their life cycle. But a few will be dramatic, creating entirely new industries
or markets.
Innovation
matters because it can deliver better products and services, new, cleaner and
more efficient production processes and improved business models. For
consumers, innovation means higher quality and better value goods, more
efficient services (both private and public) and higher standards of living.
For businesses, innovation means sustained or improved growth. The innovative
company or organization delivers higher profits for its owners and investors.
For employees, innovation means new and more interesting work, better skills
and higher wages. Equally, absence of innovation can lead to business
stagnation and a loss of jobs. For the economy as a whole innovation is the key
to higher productivity and greater prosperity for all. Innovation will also be
essential for meeting the environmental challenges of the future — including
moving to a low carbon economy and reducing waste.
So we
need to find new ways to break the link between economic growth, resource
depletion and environmental degradation. It is important to every sector of
economy, in both manufacturing and services. To hold his own in modern
manufacturing one will need to innovate strongly, creating new high-tech
manufacturing industries such as biotechnology and upgrading traditional
sectors such as steel and textiles. While manufacturing in highly
industrialized countries faces threats from developing economies, advances in
science and technology also offer many opportunities. In the last decade, the
chemicals (including pharmaceuticals), computers and office equipment and
communication sectors have all grown faster than the economy as a whole. And
even within sectors that have suffered overall decline there are sub‑sectors
where companies have grown and prospered by focusing on unique value and
innovation.
References:
1.
"Competing in the global economy: the innovation challenge", DECEMBER
2003, Department of Trade and Industry of the UK (DTI), economics paper.
2.
"Investors must stay cautious about Ukraine" by Ian Bremmer - -
http://news-ft.com/markets/123
3.
State Statistics Committee of Ukraine www.ukrstat.gov.ua
4.
"The Growing Gap Between Rich and Poor" By Tom Lewis, August 1, 2003:
http://www.globalpolicy.or /socccon/inequal/2003/0801bap.htm