PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT OF ETHNIC FACTOR
OF RITES AND TRADITIONS
Orazbaeva F.SH., (Kazakhstan), professor Department
of
the
State
Language, Kazakh
National Pedagogical University
named after Abay
Starting from 60-70th of previous century the processes characterized with
intention of people to keep up their originality, to outline unique of everyday
culture and psychological constitution took shape in world scale with a surge
of many millions of people awareness of their belonging to certain ethnos http://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/Psihol/stef/01.php
- _ftn1 – national self-consciousness or ethnic identity if
using more usual term for psychologist.
The phenomena touched population of
many countries of all continents was even named as ethnic paradox of today at
the very beginning because of it accompanies always growing unification of
spiritual and material culture.
But at present time
ethnic renaissance is a one of the basic features of humanity development in
second part of the 20th century. Almost countrywide interest to own roots
of separated peoples and whole nations is in very different forms: from attempts
to reanimate ancient rites and customs, folklorization of professional culture,
search of “enigmatic national soul” up to intention to create or reanimate
their national statehood. And if in all
the world representatives of different sciences already more than 30 years
study ethnic renaissance, in former USSR the process went in opposite
direction: national communities not only blossomed out but became closed and
national question was entirely solved. Indeed the situation in our country was not
differing from international and many nations noticed the growth of ethnic
identity and ethnic solidarity.
But if in the life of contemporary human
the awareness on his/her own belonging to certain nation, search of his/her peculiarities
– including peculiarities of psychic – play so important role and seriously
influence on relations between people – from interpersonal till
intergovernmental, the study of psychological aspect of ethic factor is utterly
necessary. There is necessity to
develop ethnopsychology as well as other sciences like ethnosociology, ethnopolitology
analyzing from different sides numerous “national” problems arose before
contemporary society. Ethnopsychologists
urged to clarify reasons of so often misunderstanding appeared during contacts of
representatives of different nations; are there any psychic peculiarities conditioned
by culture which make members of one nation ignore, look dawn upon somebody or
discriminate representatives of other nation; are there any psychological
phenomena promoted the growth of interethnic tendency and interethnic
conflicts. There is a question on psychological reasons of the growth of ethnic
identity at our time among many of questions required to be answered.
In conditions of extremely social
instability an ethnos often act as support emergency group. Exactly in such period
which is our country goes through the human being used to be oriented first of
all on ethnic communities and quite often exaggerate positive difference of
his/her own community from others.
Many people “absorbed in” such subcultures
but for the majority it is necessary to hitch to something more stable, to more
sustainable group in the period of destruction of social system. Like in other countries
experienced the epoch of extremely social instability, such groups it turned
out of generationless communities –
family and ethnos in Russia. It should not be forgot that ethnic identity is
the most available form of social identity exactly in our country: self-identify
with “nation” for the majority of citizens is not a difficulty because of soviet
passport system made “nationality” to race category detected by “blood” (origin
of parents) whereas in all civilized world this phenomena means citizenship.
With the help of understanding of their belonging
to ethnos which lost support in life of former USSR citizens who intent to find
an exit from the condition of social despondency and helplessness, to feel
themselves as a part of community which has definitely attractive
features.
What is an ethnos?
L.N.Gumilev considers an ethnos as geographic, natural phenomena but not as a
social. For this distinctive researcher an ethnos “is those or another collective
of people (movement system) opposed itself to all another analogue collective (“we»
and “not we”), that has own special internal structure and original stereotype
of behavior” (Gumilev, 1993, p. 285). He thinks basic signs of ethnos to be psychological
features as: self-consciousness (or identity) and stereotype of behavior he
took as a norm of relations between group and individuals. For better comprehension what is a behavior stereotype,
Gumilev gives an example of typical behavior of different nation’s
representatives in the tram where violent drunk came in. On opinion of researcher,
Russian “will say some sacramental words”, Gerrman will call policeman, Tatar
will stay at some distance and Georgian “will hold of offender’s shirt front
and try to throw him out of tram” (Gumilev, 1990, p. 87).
Gumilev underlines
that stereotypes of behavior are forming at first years of child life that
means belonging to ethnos is not inherited but gaining in the process of
socialization. He means not education in narrow sense of word but forming in certain
cultural sphere. And in this case scientist finds intelligible example of his
mother Anna Akhmatova which was educated in her childhood by French governess
and spoke French that did not make harm to became the Great Russian poet. But when
child behavior stereotypes formed, they could not be changed in full even he
will move to another country, learn another language and culture.
There are few
explanatory concepts of ethic renaissance of the second part of 20th
century in the world science. Different sociological schools explain the growth of ethnic identity:
à) reaction of nations lagged behind development to economic
and technological expansion of more developed nations generating ethno cultural
division of labor;
á) world social competition as a result of intensification
of interethnic cooperation in spite of unification of material and spiritual
culture;
â) raising of big social groups influence in economics and
politics and facilitation of processes of its unity due to mass communications.
At that it is asserts that exactly ethnic communities are in more advantageous situation
than other big groups, for instance classes.
Psychologist is interested
in ethnos first of all as psychological
community able to fulfill important functions for every human being:
1) To orient in surrounded
environment delivering relatively orderly information;
2) To specify
common life values;
3) To protect responding
not only for social but physical well-being. A human being always needs to feel
himself as a part of “we” and ethnos is not a single group in understanding of
belonging to which man looking support in life. A support is not enough sustainable because of composition of
groups always renews, terms of existence are limited in time and person could
be excluded out of group for any fault.
Ethnic community has no all of these shortcomings. This is
intergeneration group, its sustainable in time, stability characterizes
composition and every person has sustainable ethnic status, it is impossible to
“exclude” him out of ethnos. Thanks to these qualities an ethnos is safe group
of support to people.
Of course, there are another stable bog
groups except ethnic. There were even more groups at earlier stages of
humankind development. Today traditional societies also have groups which
fulfill value-oriented and protective function better then modern ethnos. So, information
received from them not only homogeneous and ordered but need definite, impeccable
precise fulfillment of many rites accompanying every step of human being from
birth till death and all his economical activity. Cultures of such groups oriented
on forefathers and traditions, Margaret Mid (1901-1978), great American
ethnologist, named postfigurative. It
is impossible to characterize peculiarities of such cultures better then Mid: «Postfigurative
culture is the culture where every change passes slowly and imperceptibly that grandfathers
holding newborn grandchildren in their hands could not imagine any other future
different from their own past. The past of adults is the future for every new
generation; one’s past is a scheme of future for their children…They needed
elderly people to keep such culture and not only to bring group of people to
new places in periods of hunger but to be complete sample of life as it is…
Answers on questions: “Who am I?” What is essence of my life as representative
of my culture? Which way should I speak, move, eat, sleep, love, earn for life,
meet a death?”, – are prejudged. (Mid, 1988, p.322-325).
Modern
ethic communities have no such indisputable traditions and stable picture of world,
many elements of their culture are washing away – economical activity,
dwelling, food, art are internalized. Ethnos considerably tear away from traditions,
behavior of forefathers does not consider as model by group members.
According to Mid’s terminology, they are
configurative cultures in which
“…prevailed model of people’s behavior is behavior of their contemporaries”
(Mid, 1988, p.342). But there is no rupture between generations. There are always layers
of culture allowed to understand its belongings to ethnic community: languages,
religion, myths about common forefathers, and historical memory rich with
heroic deeds or common sufferings. More
over, in today world there is psychological shift in people’s mood like huge
interest to roots. This frame of mind is a consequence of international
conflicts, danger of nuclear war, ecological threat. Human being feels instability
of world, his optimism and wish to look ahead decrease. More and more people, even young, inclined to
look backwards and deep into, search for support and protection in stable
values of forefathers. That is why exactly intergeneration stable communities, ethnos
at first in spite of foretold by Mid and actually appeared tendencies to their
destruction gain such substantial meaning in contemporary man’s life.
One of psychological reason of growth of
ethnic identity in the second part of 20th century is a search of
orienteer and stability in information oversaturated and instable world. Second psychological reason is intensification
of interethnic conflicts as direct (labor migration, students exchanges, moving
of millions of immigrants and refugees, tourism) as well as indirect contacts
like modern mass communications facilities from satellite television to
Internet network. êîììóíèêàöèè îò ñïóòíèêîâîãî òåëåâèäåíèÿ äî ñåòè «Èíòåðíåò».
Repeating contacts actualize ethnic identity. Psychological reasons of growth
of ethnic identity are equal for all mankind but special importance ethnos
obtains in epoch of radical social transformations leading to social
instability.
Considering psychological
aspects of ethnic factor of rites and traditions in Kazakh family which is
usually presented by three or four generations (elderly people, family of son,
family of grandson and family of great grandson).
They were united not too and
not only their economical interests, but their interests of blood relationship.
The head of the family is father. All problems of everyday life (funerals, moving, visits of guests, marriage of sons
and etc.) were decided by father. He exactly strengthened family ties on the
base of education to love, kind attitude to each other, sharing of duties
between members of family. Unity and friendliness are two qualities that
exactly strengthened Kazakh family.
And sphere of traditions is more complicated sphere
targeted on formation of spiritual-moral merits. Non-regulating order of execution
that or other Actions, tradition put accent attention on forming of consciousness
perception that or other moral norms, principles, laws that promote to
elaborate position of views because of they perceived not by force of automatic fulfillment but
consciously. Tradition gained such way become
the part of his principle of life that is constant development and forming of subject of ethnos to whom culture,
history and traditions of it own nation are important. And more over education of spiritual- moral qualities as higher level in
development and formation of personality come to be taking into account that children
since early age have habits to fulfill that or other actions and at that stage they
understand their own actions that is they start to understand purpose and
content of customs.
Ceremonies promote fixing of these positions and their solid penetration into
consciousness of children and youth.
It is known that rite always
accompanied with critical moments of man’s life, it accumulates thoughts and feelings
generated by important events in the life of person (born of child, entrance to
school, marriage and etc.). Rite is a sign of transition to new period of development
and in this meaning Kazakh ethnopedagogy includes following rites connected
with stages of child development “kursak toy” –is the rite, “shildekhana” – the
rite means birth of child; “at koyu”, “besik toy” –“to put into cradle”; “tysau kesu” –“intersect of fetters (on
feet); “atka mingizu” – the rite means “to sit child on horse”;
“syrga tagu” – marriage proposal; “sundet toy” – “circumcision”, initiation to
“djigits”; «betashar» – the rite of initiation to became
daughter-in-law, transition to new etnosocial role “kelin” and others.
Big educational importance of traditions,
customs and rites permits to refer them to ethnopedagogical sphere of
knowledge. They accumulated for centuries in pedagogical culture of Kazakh
people when only best was selected and obsolete, not corresponding to wishes
and spirit of people was rejected. In modern
practice of education mentioned means of ethnic education could be used taking into
account strict differensation on content, form as well as conditions of
realization.
Kazakh ethnos characterizes
such behavior:
- Behavior of collectivistic
cultures in large scale reflects group norms then individual guidelines;
- Relations between
parents and children almost sacramental;
- Kazakh people accepted
to show modesty while public appraisal of one’s achievements;
- Kazakh people accepted
to make gifts in those cases when in Europe accepted to pay money.
Thus, Kazakh ethnos has special psychological aspects that
make it differ from other ethnos. Special meaning in education of Kazakhs plays
their orienteer on education of obedience and responsibility, usually via
participation in economical activity and domestic activity; special place paid
to education of care, help to younger brothers and sisters.