Jiří
Bydžovský, Tomáš Melichar
Brno University
of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering
In the last few
decades of the past century there was a dynamic development in the building
industry, namely in the area of utilization of waste, or more precisely
secondary raw materials. The recycling cycle, whose outputs – raw materials –
are, in many cases, considered to be full-value basic products, plays an
important role concerning these issues and these raw materials are plentifully
utilized in the building industry. Waste recyclability depends mainly on
financial resources and their applicability to production of new materials
which might be a limiting factor in this case. Despite of the fact that quite
high volumes of waste are being processed, considerable volumes are still being
disposed without any subsequent utilization.
Secondary raw
materials include various types of recycled glass. Production processes connected
with raw glass, or more precisely glass products, are focused mainly on their
visual features (colour, transparency, etc.) which are significant or even
crucial criteria for their competitive advantage in the market. With respect to
this fact recycled raw glass cannot always be fully utilized in glass
production, i.e. it cannot fully replace glass stone which is the basic raw
material for glass production, but it can be used partially (this fact is
closely connected with the high purity requirements for fragments and it
depends on product types). Probably the best known types of raw glass in
connection with recycling are clear and coloured bottles and containers and ordinary
flat glass obtained mainly from demolished buildings or car wrecks. Some types of
raw glass are not suitable for glassworks at all. Electrical products with
expired lifespan, i.e. fluorescent lamps, spotlights, lamps, car headlamps,
etc. are worth mentioning. A significant volume of glass waste is also obtained
from disassembled useless TV screens and computer monitors. They are the older types
of screens – CRT (Cathode Ray Tube) – which are currently being replaced by LCD
screens. There are specialized lines designed for screen disassembling,
cleaning and sorting raw glass whose technologies are patented. Therefore,
there is the problem what to do with full-value raw glass which cannot be
utilized in glass production because it contains some undesirable (toxic)
elements. In the area of utilization of secondary raw materials obtained from
glass recycling several researches have been carried out in many ways (cement
composites, macromolecule-based plastering mixtures, glass ceramics, etc.) but no
fully satisfying results which would solve these issues complexly have been
achieved. Production of glass-silicate materials offers a wide range of ways how
to utilize recycled glass which has not been utilized at all yet and,
therefore, harms the environment due to its disposal.
Everybody knows
glass in the common sense of the word, i.e. panels in building structures, cars
and housing accessories. Glass-silicate material is known less among common
people. This material consists mainly of raw glass which is supplied in the
form of granulate of specific fractions. Borosilicate raw glass produced
directly at glassworks is currently being used for production of
glass-silicates, i.e. it is a source raw material. Raw glass creates most of the
material batch in production of glass-silicates (approx. 95 - 99 %). The other substances,
mainly the ones correcting production processes (sintering temperature) or some
final features (volume weight, appearance – texture and colour), are mainly
pigments and silica sand. The production process connected with glass-silicate
materials consists of the following technological operations:
· Mechanical
pre-treatment of the basic raw material (mainly borosilicate raw glass) in
separation and refining machines (grinders and mills),
· Sorting the
required fractions in order to obtain the required grain size composition (sieve
analysis),
· Homogenization of
all the batch components – i.e. raw glass granulate, silica sand, pigments, etc.,
· Piling up into
refractory moulds which are usually equipped with a suitable, e.g.
kaolin-based, separating layer,
· Heat treatment of
the batch in electric furnace aggregates (where sintering is carried out)
according to the defined temperature regime – controlled heating and cooling,
· Mechanical treatment
in order to obtain the required form of products and polishing in order to obtain
the final surface using specialized diamond tools formed into automated lines.
Fig. 1 : Piled up raw glass granulate with
black pigmentation for production of glass-silicate board in a refractory mould
The typical
feature of glass-silicates is their texture which is similar to crystalline materials
(stone facing and paving) but their physico-mechanical and chemical features
are based on the features of glass which makes dominant part of these
materials. The characteristic texture appearance is caused by the suitable heat
regime – sintering. In the course of this process particular grains are
sintered together at continuous compaction of the system which avoids creation
of pores and a coherent matrix is made. But the batch does not melt. Taking the
pigment application into account is also very important. There are mainly
metallic oxides which make the final colour spectrum of glass-silicate boards.
Some types of pigment admixtures (even their fractional volume – i.e. approx. 1
%) regulate the boundary of the maximum isothermal persistence when sintering
is carried out. The following figure shows a temperature regime curve which is
commonly used for production of glass-silicate facing boards and paving in the
building industry. This defined temperature mode is typical for products made
of the above-mentioned borosilicate raw glass.
Glass-silicates
have very good strength features (their bending strength is approx. 30 N.mm-2),
very low or no absorptive capacity, closed system of pores, high chemical resistance,
frost resistance, colour stability, resistance to sudden temperature changes
and they are environmentally friendly. The disadvantage of glass-based
materials is their fragility. Moreover, glass-silicates are quite expensive
which is connected mainly with their final mechanical treatment carried out to obtain
the required form, shape and surface lustre. These materials are used mainly as
facing and paving for both interiors and exteriors. Besides the building area
these materials can be used e.g. for production of tombstones (nowadays there
is a lack of Swedish black granite which is the basic raw material for
tombstones) or building interior accessories (table boards, etc.).
Glass-silicate boards can be used at food and chemical plants. Another way of
their utilization is swimming-pools. Architectonical utilization can also be
considered – in the form of aesthetic accessories for buildings (translucent
facades or floors, etc.).
The
above-mentioned text obviously states that production of glass-silicates is
quite a difficult process in terms of energy and raw materials. Therefore,
there is a concern to optimize the production process connected with
glass-silicates and to possibly modify their composition using as many
secondary raw materials as possible and, at the same time, keep their declared
parameters. The following secondary raw materials were considered for the purposes
of this research:
·
Recycled
raw glass obtained from disassembled screens and computer monitors – namely it
was a mixture of funnel and screen parts – CRT samples,
·
Recycled
raw glass obtained from collected coloured bottles – i.e. common waste which
has been recycled.
Borosilicate raw
glass of specific fractions supplied directly by the producer was chosen as the
reference raw material on the basis of the above-mentioned findings. It was
necessary to pre-treat the grain size of the screen raw glass in a ball mill.
Before the modification of the composition of the raw material batch started, the
secondary raw materials as well as the primary raw materials had been analyzed
– i.e. sieve analysis and determination of the chemical composition of the particular
substances. Then the formulas were drawn up and laboratory firings were carried
out according to the determined temperature regime curve. The important fact is
that it was necessary to adjust the isothermal persistence in the sintering
area (i.e. 960 °C – this temperature is typical for borosilicate raw glass)
according to the features of the input raw material (i.e. the size of the
maximum fraction and the chemical status) which is shown in the charts.
Regarding the screen raw glass which contains lead monoxide and other melting
compounds, the temperature dropped down but the container raw glass needed
higher temperature.
Tab. 1 : Chemical composition of alternative raw
materials used for production of glass-silicate materials
Component |
Glass sample |
||
REF [%] |
CRT [%] |
COL [%] |
|
SiO2 |
72.01 |
66.79 |
69.73 |
Al2O3 |
7.11 |
4.21 |
1.76 |
Fe2O3 |
- |
0.28 |
0.41 |
BaO |
1.98 |
10.70 |
0.26 |
CaO |
105 |
0.28 |
9.96 |
B2O3 |
10.24 |
- |
- |
MgO |
- |
0.11 |
2.29 |
Na2O |
6.22 |
7.57 |
12.20 |
K2O |
2.02 |
6.91 |
0.88 |
PbO |
- |
0.91 |
- |
SrO |
- |
0.25 |
- |
TiO2 |
- |
0.04 |
- |
LiO2 |
- |
0.38 |
- |
MnO |
- |
- |
0.02 |
Cr2O3 |
- |
- |
0.072 |
ZrO2 |
- |
- |
0.05 |
Organic compounds |
- |
- |
0.33 |
The
determination of presence of particular compounds in terms of chemical
composition of the chosen types of raw materials shows a certain similarity.
The dominant compound is silicon oxide which determines the basic
physico-mechanical parametres of the glass. Other important compounds are
alkalies combined with lead monoxide which play a role mainly in terms of reduction
of the temperature necessary for sintering. No less important is the amount of
heavy toxic metals in the glass matrix. In this particular case they are PbO and
SrO. Although there is only a very small amount of these harmful compounds, it
is very important to take them into account. With respect to the fact that they
are secondary raw materials, presence of some organic impurities must also be
taken into account. They might have a negative impact on the parametres of the
final products as well as their appearance. By this reason the content of
organic compounds in recycled glass obtained from collected coloured glass was
determined. The chemical analysis also shows that the borosilicate (reference)
raw glass contains approx. 10 % of B2O3. It is generally
known that this oxide is added to raw glass matrices in order to ensure high
chemical resistance.
The following
table (Tab. 2) contains an assessment of the sieve analysis, i.e. the analysis
of distribution of the particular granulate fractions. The values are included
in the chart bellow for easier comparison and the following symbols are used:
· REF – reference borosilicate raw
glass supplied directly by the producer which is unchanged in terms of
mechanical and chemical treatment,
· CRT – recycled raw glass obtained from
diassembled TV screens and computer monitors, namely it is a mixture of screen
(front) and funnel parts supplied directly from a recycling line,
· CRT-ground – screen raw glass
mechanically treated - refined in a ball mill,
· COL-fine – fine-grained raw glass obtained
from recycled coloured bottles and other containers supplied directly from a
recycling line,
· COL-coarse – coarse-grain raw glass
obtained from recycled coloured bottles and other containers supplied directly
from a recycling line.
Tab. 2 : Analysis of the size of elements
of the granulated input material
Sieve
[%] |
Undersize
[%] |
||||
REF |
CRT |
CRT-ground |
COL-fine |
COL-coarse |
|
0.00 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.50 |
9.0 |
0.9 |
12.5 |
41.6 |
0.9 |
1.00 |
21.2 |
12.0 |
24.6 |
63.4 |
2.5 |
2.00 |
732 |
31.7 |
45.0 |
89.3 |
5.9 |
4.00 |
96.2 |
54.8 |
72.6 |
100.0 |
24.5 |
8.00 |
100.0 |
74.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
59.0 |
16.00 |
100.0 |
956 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
98.5 |
32.00 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Fig. 2 : Curve of the grain size of the
screen raw glass supplied from a recycling line (a mixture of funnels and
screens)
When the
temperature compaction of the granulated batch was finished, the sizes of the samples
and the roughness of their surfaces were modified to start an analysis of their
physico-mechanical and chemical parameters. Bending strength and fracture power
according to ČSN EN 10545-4, absorptive capacity according to ČSN EN
10545-3 and frost resistance according to ČSN EN 10545-11 were determined.
For determination of particular parameters of the produced materials there were
sets consisting of five pieces of test specimens each made in order to obtain reliable,
statistically assessable sets of analyzed data. The following charts show only
the average resultant values of the above-mentioned analyses and their mutual
comparison. The following symbols are used in the charts:
R – bending strength [N.mm‑2],
E – absorptive capacity [%].
Fig. 3 : Graphic assessment of the values
of bending strength of a set of the test specimens under ordinary climatic
conditions and a set of the test specimens after the frost test
Fig. 4 : Graphic assessment of the values of absorptive
capacity of the samples before and after the frost test
Explanatory
notes to the marking of the produced test bodies used in the charts above (Fig.
19 - 22):
·
REF,
CRT (ground), COL (fine and coarse) – a set of samples made of borosilicate
(reference), screen and container raw glass (for the marking see Tab. 2),
·
700,
750, 775, 800, 900, 960, 1050 – temperatures of the maximum isothermal
persistence in the course of the production process,
·
0-1,
0-4, 0-6, 0-8, 1-4, 1-8, 4-8, 0-2, 0-16 – used fractions of the secondary raw
material.
The produced
samples were also assessed visually, mainly with respect to their structure
which is, thanks to the glass-silicates, very interesting for architectonical
purposes. The following photographs show some representative samples and their
textures.
Fig. 5 : Texture of a representative sample
of the CRT 700 0-1 formula (left) and the CRT 800 0-8 formula (right)
Fig. 6 : Texture of a representative sample
of the COL 800 0-16
formula (left) and the COL 960 0-16 formula (right)
Fig. 7 : Texture of a representative sample
of the REF 960 0-8 formula (left)) and the CRT 775 0-8 formula (right))
The analyses above
show a significant addiction of the bending strength of the final materials to
the type of the secondary raw material used for the process. The maximum
temperature in the area of the first isothermal persistence, whose drop raises
the question of energy consumption and ecologic aspects, also closely
corresponds with the features of the secondary raw material (i.e. its chemical
status, the maximum grain size and mainly purity of the input raw material).
The charts obviously show that the samples not using the fine fraction reported
the highest strength which also minimizes creation of macro-pores. It is also
obvious that most of the produced test specimens showed significantly better
strength parameters than the reference samples which is a very positive result.
There was a significant drop only in the formulas which did not undergo appropriately
high isothermal persistence (CRT 700 4-8 and COL 800 0-16). By using the screen
raw glass the volume of consumed electricity was significantly smaller.
The absorptive
capacity significantly determines the openness, or more precisely the closeness
of the pore system. An overwhelming majority of the samples of the proposed
formulas showed very low values of their absorptive capacity, i.e. below 0.5 %,
which was, in a certain way, foreseeable regarding the glass-silicate
materials. Inversely proportional addiction of the absorptive capacity to the
bending strength, the maximum fraction of the raw material and the isothermal
persistence also proved there which can be demonstrated by the graphic
comparison of the reached values. Regarding the container glass, purity of this
input raw material, mainly the content of organic substances (residues of glues
and labels) also played an important role – see Fig. 6 (presence of burnt out residues after decomposition
of macromolecular substances which cause, together with a certain level of
viscosity, so-called flatulence).
Frost resistance
of facing elements is defined as a graphic comparison of the absorptive
capacity values before and after the determined number of frost and defrost cycles
is carried out. In this case there were 100 cycles carried out in total. The
absorptive capacity comparison is shown in Fig.
4. We can say that all the produced samples showed the
maximum frost resistance level according to ČSN EN 10545-12. Nevertheless,
in order to make the frost influence on the strength parameters clear, the test
specimens were a subject of determination of their bending strength where the
influence of the temperature cycles was more evident. But there was no
significant difference which would significantly restrict utilization of the
materials under external climatic conditions.
At the
conclusion I can state that recycled raw glass from different sources
represents a very lucrative and potential raw material for production of
glass-based board materials which are used mainly as façade facing, or
possibly paving in residential buildings.
The text has
been drawn up within the MSM 0021630511 research project – “Progressive
Building Materials with Utilization of Secondary Raw Materials and their Impact
on Structures Durability” and the FT-TA5/147 project – “Sintered products made
of by-products for creation of walls and floor surface treatment”.
[1].
FANDERLIK,
I.: Silica glass and its application,
Elsevier Amsterdam, 1991
[2].
MATOUŠEK,
J. Anorganické nekovové
materiály, VŠCHT v Praze, 1992
[3].
W.
ZHANG, W. and SCHNEIBEL, J.H. The
Sintering of Two Particles by Surface and Grain Boundary Diffusion - a
Two-Dimensional Numerical Study p. 4377, 1995, Elsevier Science
[4].
ŽIŽKA, T., Automatizace výroby velkoplošných
sklokrystalických obkladů, Silika č. 1-2, časopis pro
silikátový průmysl, 2006
[5].
ČSN
EN ISO 10545-3 Ceramic tiles – Part 3: Determination of water absorption,
apparent porosity, apparent relative density and bulk density
[6].
ČSN
EN ISO 10545-4 Ceramic tiles – Part 4: Determination of modulus of rupture and
breaking strength
[7].
ČSN
EN ISO 10545-12 Ceramic tiles – Part 12: Determination of frost resistance