Ýêîíîìè÷åñêèå íàóêè/ 2. Âíåøíåýêîíîìè÷åñêàÿ
äåÿòåëüíîñòü
Economic sciences / 2. International activity
Master of Economics, PhD- Candidate Natalia
Lashkevich
the University “G.
D’Annunzio” Chieti-Pescara, Italy.
Convergence of international trade and food safety
Summary
Globalisation is one of the
major world trends. In the context of globalisation the role of export-import
transactions is increasing. However, the extension and growth of trade
relations are interrelated with such important international problem as
ensuring of food safety. That is why the one of strategical goals is the
strengthening of international food control system.
The world economy is increasingly integrated and the
trading system is more liberalized. This trend will continue in the coming
years, in view of the increasing globalisation.
The EC
common policy aims to the harmonious, balanced and sustainable development of
economic activities. Therefore international trade is one of the orientations
of economic policy to provide growth, employment and investment in the EU.
The analysis of the EU international trade activity
showed that the
EC is the world's leading exporter and the second-largest importer of goods.[1]
Table
1. Share of national export in world export (%)
Year |
European
Union (27) |
United
States |
China
(except Hong Kong) |
2005 |
18 |
12,4 |
10,5 |
2006 |
17,3 |
12,3 |
11,5 |
2007 |
17,4 |
11,9 |
12,5 |
2008 |
16,7 |
11,2 |
12,4 |
2009 |
17,2 |
11,8 |
13,5 |
Average
share |
17,32 |
11,92 |
12,08 |
Source
of Data: Eurostat [2]
Table
2. Share of national import in world import (%)
Year |
European
Union (27) |
United
States |
China
(except Hong Kong) |
2005 |
19,0 |
22,5 |
8,6 |
2006 |
19,1 |
21,6 |
8,9 |
2007 |
19,1 |
19,6 |
9,3 |
2008 |
19,1 |
17,9 |
9,4 |
2009 |
18,0 |
17,1 |
10,8 |
Average
share |
18,86 |
19,74 |
9,4 |
Source
of Data: Eurostat [3]
During
2005 - 2009 the EU’s share of export is about 17%, share of import is about
19%. That is why the EU is the biggest trading bloc in the world.
Recognizing that the EU is one
of the trade partners of many countries and economic blocs in food commodities
and taking into consideration that policy of business relations is changing
between business-operators (extension of business-communications, appearance of
new cooperation and collaboration business forms) it is necessary to analyse
tendencies in food trade.
Table 3. International trade
of food commodities between the EU and "World"
Indexes |
imports |
exports |
||||
Total all products |
All food items |
Total all products |
All food items |
|||
qnt |
qnt |
share |
qnt |
qnt |
share |
|
2005 |
4046797537 |
318684967,8 |
7,87 |
3968076537 |
300253507,6 |
7,57 |
2006 |
4681350302 |
348503053,1 |
7,44 |
4507426139 |
329256362,5 |
7,30 |
2007 |
5419029394 |
420442947,4 |
7,76 |
5240795642 |
393765317,9 |
7,51 |
2008 |
6082831182 |
494766315,2 |
8,13 |
5806445367 |
464183902,6 |
7,99 |
2009 |
4535002483 |
423762494 |
9,34 |
4474401339 |
406342901,8 |
9,08 |
Source: Unctadstat [4]
Table 3 shows that level of the EU’s international trade in foodstuffs
constantly increased since 2005 till 2008. Economic crisis has resulted in a large loss in economic
activity of Europe's exports and imports.
That is why the European
Council adopted the Europe 2020 strategy in
June 2010 with ambitious targets for a new
growth path. A new strategy based on enhanced coordination of economic
policies and focused on three key priorities:
-
Smart growth - developing an
economy based on knowledge and innovation.
-
Sustainable growth - promoting a
more resource efficient, greener and more competitive economy.
-
Inclusive growth - fostering a
high-employment economy delivering economic, social and territorial cohesion.
[5], [6]
The Europe 2020 strategies require well
functioning and well-connected markets with fair competitiveness for business
operators and a free consumer access. That is why, single market policy is the key to ensure a
level playing field within the EU, guaranteeing fair competition conditions and
offering major opportunities for sustainable growth. The EC pursues these
objectives at the multilateral, bilateral, and unilateral levels:
-
At the multilateral level the Doha Development
Agenda (DDA) is the important approach
to reduce
restrictions on international trade and to promote open and rules-based global
trade.
-
The
bilateral cooperation aims to ensure reducing of barriers to international
flows of trade.
-
At the unilateral level Member States should
improve the support of domestic entrepreneurship,
consumption and employment.
In the context of globalisation the value
of the Single Market is
constantly increased. Entrepreneurship and business want to receive an
improving access (the more free and fair) to raw materials, markets and investments,
etc. Consumers want to receive wide consumer choice of quality, safety commodities
on fair prices.
However, the integration and consolidation
of food industries and the globalization of the food trade are changing the
patterns of food production and distribution. It is necessary to recognize that
with growth of international trade in foodstuffs and of globalisation of food
production the new food-borne diseases will rapidly spread and the likelihood
of contaminated food will increase. As a result of these trends is increased
consumer demand on food safety worldwide. Consumers expect protection from
hazards occurring along the entire food chain, from primary producer through
consumer.[7], [8], [9]
With a view to provide food safety the EC laid down such main regulations
as 178/2002, 882/2004, 852/2004, 1881/2006 and others. [10], [11], [12], [13] According
to these law acts the Community general require is that food imported into the
Community for placing on the market within the Community shall comply with the
relevant requirements of food law or conditions recognised by the Community to
be at least equivalent thereto or, where a specific agreement exits between the
Community and the exporting country, with requirements contained therein.
However, there are many cases of infringements and failures to carry out food
safety requirements in the international trade practice. For example, the EU Rapid Alert System for
Food and Feed (RASFF) notified infringements with legal limits for pesticide
residues in imported produce to the EU from third countries between 2004 and
2010.[14] In order to ensure confidence of European citizens
in safety of imported products and to find ways to rising food safety the Food
and Veterinary Office (FVO) of the Directorate General for Health and Consumers
of the European Commission carries out
inspection checks on products from countries where the risk of contamination is
considered greater. Usually in countries where the food control infrastructure
and systems for investigation of food-borne disease are weak or non-existent,
industrially produced foods may be contaminated or even adulterated. Despite
all efforts at good agricultural practice in many countries the raw foodstuffs
may be contaminated. Modern farming systems, food processing and marketing do
not always provide completely adequate safeguards for public health. Consumer
protection will only occur if all sectors in the chain operate in an integrated
way.
During
inspection missions the FVO evaluates special issues of control system (import
control, food hygiene control) or the implementation of some items of food
legislation. [15] Factors which contribute to potential hazards in foods
include improper agricultural practices; poor hygiene at all stages of the food
chain; lack of preventive controls in food processing and preparation
operations; misuse of chemicals; contaminated raw materials, ingredients and
water; inadequate or improper storage, etc. [16]
In order to
achieve effectiveness of international check systems and to improve the system
of food safety assurances it is necessary to implement the evaluation of
international foodstuffs chain and existent food control systems should be
built into scientific-based approach. Risk assessment is a science-based
process. Risk assessments play an important role in international trade by
ensuring that countries establish food safety requirements that are
scientifically sound and by providing a means for determining equivalent levels
of public health protection between countries. Without systematic assessment of
risk assessment, countries may set requirements that are not related to food
safety, and could create artificial barriers to trade. Using risk assessment in
international food control practice will allow to identify likelihoods of food
contaminations along international food chain with a view to improve and
strengthen international and local food control systems.[17]
Recognizing the EU’s striving
for sustainable growth the major orientation will be the convergence of
well-functioning fair competitiveness markets with well-connected and risk-based
food control systems.
References
1.
Trade Policy Review WT/TPR/S/214/Rev.1 8 June 2009 (09-2701) // WORLD
TRADE ORGANIZATION
3.
http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=tet00018&plugin=1
4.
http://unctadstat.unctad.org/ReportFolders/reportFolders.aspx
5.
COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE
COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE
REGIONS Annual Growth Survey: advancing the EU's comprehensive response to the
crisis /* COM(2011) 11 final*/‘© European Union, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/’
6.
COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION EUROPE 2020 A strategy for smart,
sustainable and inclusive growth / *COM(2010) 2020*/‘© European Union,
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/’
7.
Recommendation for a COUNCIL
RECOMMENDATION of 27.4.2010 on broad guidelines for the economic policies of
the Member States and of the Union Part I of the Europe 2020 Integrated
Guidelines /*COM(2010) 193 final*/ SEC(2010) 488 final/ ‘© European Union,
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/’
8.
Report of the EVALUATION OF THE CODEX ALIMENTARIUS AND OTHER FAO AND WHO
FOOD STANDARDS WORK // World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations, 15 November 2002
9.
Trade
Policy Review WT/TPR/S/214 2 March 2009 (09-1000) // WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION
RESTRICTED
10.
Regulation (EC) No
178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002
laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing
the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of
food safety. // OJ L 31, 1.02.2002, p.
01. ‘© European Union, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/’
11.
Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the
Council of 29 April 2004 on official controls performed to ensure the
verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health an animal
welfare rules. // OJ L 165,
30.04.2004. Corrected and re-published
in OJ L 191, 28.05.2004 p. 01. ‘© European Union, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/’
12.
Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 OJ L
139, 30.04.2004. Corrected and re-published in OJ L 226, 25.06.2004 p. 03. Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the hygiene of
foodstuffs. ‘© European Union, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/’
13.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 setting
maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006. OJ
L 364, 20.12.2006, p. 05. ‘© European Union, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/’
14.
Overview report of a series of missions carried
out in third countries between 2004 and 2010 to evaluate controls of pesticides
in food of plant origin intended for export to the European Union. //
http://ec.europa.eu/food/fvo/ir_search_en.cfm
- No 2010-6140-OR
15.
http://ec.europa.eu/food/fvo/specialreports/index_en.htm
16.
ASSURING FOOD SAFETY AND QUALITY: GUIDELINES FOR STRENGTHENING NATIONAL
FOOD CONTROL SYSTEMS / Joint FAO/WHO Publication
17.
Food Quality and Safety Systems - A Training
Manual on Food Hygiene and the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point
(HACCP) System // FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS, Rome, 1998 © FAO 1998