Philological sciences /Rhetoric and stylistics

 

Vilkhovchenko N.P.

Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Ukraine

Quasi-special vocabulary in science fiction and its components

 

The aim of the paper is to analyze the peculiarities of the quasi-special vocabulary in science fiction stories of modern English-speaking authors. The paper considers quasi-special vocabulary as a part of science fiction lexicon. The units of quasi-special vocabulary are found out to appear as a part of science-fiction special lexicon. They do not exist in science and form author’s fantastic world, naming objects and phenomena that do not exist. So, according to our investigation, the special lexicon of science fiction includes new lexical formations (quasi-special vocabulary) which name the phenomena and objects invented by the author.

Among the researchers, whose papers are devoted to the analysis of the science fiction lexicon, there are divergences in definition of the lexical layer of the coined special vocabulary. So, some researchers define this lexical layer as false terms (N. Bochegova [23]), others define them as nonce words (Yu. Kovalyk [27], T. Teslenko [33]), or neologisms (N. Novikova [31], L. Kuznetsova [28], A. Lysenko [30]).

We consider the term neologism to have another tint of meaning: it names objects that exist; “false term”, in our opinion, contains some negative connotation; a nonce word is a synonym of the neutral word. In our opinion, it would be more reasonable to designate this lexical layer as “quasi-special vocabulary” (semi-suffix “quasi” is related to the adjectives of unreal, imaginary).

As our observations show, the notion of the quasi-special vocabulary in science fiction is quite broad and includes the layer of the quasi-terminology (terminology created by author to denote imaginary objects), the layer of the quasi-nomenclature (brands of the imaginary devices, machines) and the quasi-special non-verbal units (imaginary charts, formulas, maps, tables).

According to our calculations, the total amount of special science fiction lexicon in the analysed texts (22 novels and short stories, 2000 pages) is 1970 units, among which we single out 1073 units of the special vocabulary proper and 897 units of the quasi-special vocabulary. In addition, among the quasi-special vocabulary we single out 696 quasi-terms, 140 quasi-nomenclature units, and 61 quasi-special non-verbal units.

According to our research, the quasi-special vocabulary comprises 45.5% of the special lexicon in science fiction. Moreover, most quasi-special units belong to the quasi-terminology (35.5%), the quasi-nomenclature comprises 7%, and the quasi-special non-verbal units comprise only 3% of all the units of the quasi-special vocabulary of science fiction. As the largest group of the quasi-special vocabulary is made of the quasi-terminology, research of it is of major importance. So, the special vocabulary (54. 5%) comprises the basic part of special science fiction lexicon.

The quasi-special vocabulary is widely used together with the special vocabulary proper. It should be noted that the emergence of the quasi-special vocabulary is predefined by the human ability to imagine the objects and phenomena which do not have their analogue in reality, and by ability of human imagination to create the fantastic worlds. According to our observations, the units of the quasi-special vocabulary imitate the properties of the units of the special vocabulary proper. They also possess such features as monosemanticity, exactness, and even the presence of definition. However, unlike the special vocabulary, most units of the quasi-special vocabulary depend on the context, as they are a product of the author’s individual imagination.

In order to single out quasi-special from neutral vocabulary, from the units of special vocabulary and neologisms, we apply extralinguistic criterion (absence of the realia denoted by this word) and linguistic one (absence of this word and/or its meaning in the most complete modern dictionaries).

So, the quasi-special vocabulary is a layer of the new lexical units that name the objects and phenomena which exist exclusively in the author’s imaginary world; the quasi-special vocabulary includes the layer of the quasi-terminology, the quasi-nomenclature and the quasi-special non-verbal units.

The research material shows that the quasi-terminology is the largest layer of the quasi-special vocabulary (35.5%) in science fiction. This layer includes coined by the author terminology which denotes the fantastic phenomena and objects.

According to N. Bochegova, the terms coined by the author create the atmosphere of the futurity [23, P.17]. Comparing their function to the function of the terms proper, the researcher asserts that the quasi-terms also create scientific and technical world, however not in objective reality, but in fantastic one.

There are some examples of the quasi-terminology: Simstim [8] and Space Detector [18] are devices, Defence Laser [18] is a type of a weapon, Tin Man [9] is a robot. So, the usage of the quasi-terminology is one of the specific features of the science fiction lexicon.

As it has been mentioned above, besides the lexical layer of the quasi-terminology the quasi-special vocabulary includes the quasi-nomenclature which comprises 7% of the total amount of the quasi-special vocabulary in science fiction. The scientific nomenclature units include the names of different types of equipment, machines, types of constructions, brands of wares, and others. Professor V. Leychik determines the nomenclature as an intermediate layer between the terms and proper names. As the scientist asserts, the nomenclature plays the role of a “label” of objects [29, P.14].

       Using the original signs, the nomenclature does not have any direct concordance with the norms of language [26, P.15]. It is worth saying that understanding the nomenclature (for example, the names of models or brands of devices) is impossible without its correlation with the term itself (which, for example, names this device).

S. Vilchinsky differentiates two types of the nomenclature. He singles out  the nomenclature of scientific cognition of natural objects and the nomenclature of “the second nature” [25, P.7-8]. According to his research, nomenclature of “the second nature” individualizes scientific and technical objects. The proper names which denote such objects as the place-names, the names of stars, planets (e.g., Chad, Zimbabwe, [10], Centauri [8]) refer to the nomenclature of natural objects.

It is certain, most nomenclature units are the “product of “artificial language” composed of sign figures, for example, sets of morphemes, numbers and sign indexes” [24, P.117]. So, they are created with the help of signs, but not words.

The quasi-nomenclature is one of the layers of the quasi-special vocabulary of science fiction. It names single objects or single groups of objects that are coined by the author. However, like other layers of the science fiction special lexicon, the quasi-nomenclature reveals the basic features of science fiction genre such as the fantastic and scientific character.

For example, the brands of spaceships or robots represent such characteristic features as scientific character (as they create the effect of authenticity) and fantastic character (because being invented by the author, they describe the objects of the imaginary worlds which do not exist in reality).

The examples of the quasi-nomenclature are Unit Pte-900, Unit R-0012-zgy [21], Interstellar Freighter Aragonne Isabell, Bolo Mark XXX [18], which are brands of spaceships and robots, Epsilon Sindri, Delas [18] are the names of the imaginary stars and planets.

According to our observations, the quasi-special non-verbal units comprise 3% of the total amount of the quasi-special units in science fiction, although they also play a considerable role in creation of the imaginary fantastic world. The quasi-special non-verbal units include imaginary tables, charts, pictures, maps, formulas etc. For instance, A+p=!,  A+?O = ! [10] are imaginary formulas. The problem of functioning of the non-verbal the in text of fiction has been studied by N. Stepanyuk [32, P.10]. The researcher notes that relations between the non-verbal units and the verbal text have hypo-hyperonymic character. The non-verbal units specify and summarize the information of verbal text. As the author asserts, they bear a unique stylistic potential of the work of fiction. The quasi-special non-verbal units play an important role in creation of the image of fantastic time and space (for example, maps of star worlds), and they create the effect of authenticity in science fiction (for example, the imaginary formulas create the effect of authenticity of science fiction theories).

To sum up, the layer of the special vocabulary is an integral part of the science fiction lexicon. The quasi-special vocabulary is a layer of the new lexical vocabulary that functions in science fiction and names scientific and technical objects and phenomena which exist exclusively in the author’s imaginary world.

The quasi-special vocabulary of science fiction includes the lexical layer of the quasi-terminology, the quasi-nomenclature and the quasi-special non-verbal units. In fact, the quasi-terminology comprises 35.5% of the total amount of the special science fiction lexicon, what makes up the basic part of the quasi-special vocabulary.

 

References:

 

1.     Adams, D. Life, the Universe, and Everything [WWW document] - (Библиотека Максима Мошкова) - URL http://www.lib.ru / INOFANT

2.    Adams, D. Young Zaphod plays its safe [WWW document] - (Библиотека Максима Мошкова) - URL http://www.lib.ru / INOFANT

3.    Bethke, B. Cyberpunk [WWW document] - (Библиотека Максима Мошкова) -URL http://www.lib.ru / INOFANT

4.    Bradbury, R. The Veldt [WWW document]. URL http://www.lib.ru / INOFANT

5.    Clarke, A. The Songs of Distant Earth. – London: Voyager, 2001. – 242p.

6.    Dietz, William C. Steelheart.  - New York: Ace Books, 1998. – 324p.

7.    Gerrold, D. The Martian Child [WWW document] - (Библиотека Максима Мошкова) - URL http://lib.ru/GERROLD/gerro01.txt

8.    Gibson, W. Johnny Mnemonic [WWW document] - (Библиотека Максима Мошкова) - URL http://lib.ru/GIBSON/gibso01.txt

9.    Gibson, W. Neuromancer  [WWW document] - (Библиотека Максима Мошкова) - URL  http://lib.ru/GIBSON/gibso01.txt

10.      Idle, E. The Road to Mars. -  London: Boxtree, 1999. – 309p.

11.     Jones, T. Starship Titanic. - New York: Ballantine Books, 1998. – 246p.

12.     Laumer, K. In the Queue [WWW document] - (Библиотека Максима Мошкова) -URL http://www.webscription.net

13.     Laumer, K. Time Trap [WWW document] - (Библиотека Максима Мошкова) -URL http://www.webscription.net

14.     McCaffrey, A. and Scarborough, E.A. Acorna`s – New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 2000. – 306 p.

15.     Shekley, R.  Pilgrimage to Earth [WWW document] - (Библиотека Максима Мошкова) - URL http://www.lib.ru / INOFANT 

16.     Shekley, R. The Day the Aliens Came [WWW document] - (Библиотека Максима Мошкова) - URL http://www.lib.ru / INOFANT

17.     Simak, C.D. All the Traps of Earth  [WWW document] - (Библиотека Максима Мошкова) - URL http://www.lib.ru / INOFANT

18.     Stephenson, N. Cryptonomicon [WWW document] - (Библиотека Максима Мошкова) - URL http://www.lib.ru / INOFANT

19.     Thies, M. Incrusion. In: Bolos: Old Guard.- New York: Baen, 2001. – 135p.

20.     Varley, J. In the Bowl [WWW document] - (Библиотека Максима Мошкова) - URL http://www.lib.ru / INOFANT

21.     Vinge, V. A Fire Upon the Deep [WWW document] - (Библиотека Максима Мошкова) -URL http://www.lib.ru / INOFANT

22.     York, J.Steven and Smith, D.Wesley. The Sky is Falling. -  New York: Baen, 2001. – P.165-290.

23.     Бочегова Н.И. Стилистическая функция терминов в контексте художественного произведения: автореферат дис. на соискание науч. степени  канд. филол. наук: спец.: 10.02.04 «Германские языки» / Бочегова Н.И. – Л., 1978. – 19с.

24.     Б'ялик П. В. Стратифікація професійної лексики / Б'ялик П. В. // Науковий вісник Чернівецького університету: германська філологія. – Чернівці: “Рута”, 2000. - Вип. 71. – С.114 –118.

25.     Вильчинский С. С. Взаимодействие терминологии, номенклатуры и общелитературной лексики: автореферат дис. на соискание науч. степени  канд. филол. наук: спец.: 10.02.19 «Теория языка» / Вильчинский С. С. - К., 1987. - 24с.

26.     Д΄яков А.С. Основи термінотворення / Д΄яков А. С., Кіяк Т. Р., Куделько З. Б. - Київ: “KM.Academia”, 2000. – 218с.     

27.     Ковалик Ю. «Фантастическая реальность»: опыт лингвистического похода / Ковалик Ю. // Тезисы докладов и сообщений на Всесоюзной научной конференции-семинара, посвящ. творчеству И. А. Ефремова и проблемам научной фантастики. – Николаев, 1988. – С.121-123.

28.     Кузнецова Л. А. Язык и стиль научно-фантастических романов         Г. Уэллса: диссертация…канд. филол. наук: 10.02.04 / Кузнецова Л. А. – Львов, 1967. – 343с.

29.     Лейчик В. М. О процессе формирования термина / Лейчик В. М. // Функционирование терминов в современном русском языке. – Горький, 1986. - С. 32-38.

30.     Лисенко А. А. Сербська та хорватська науково-фантастична лексика: монографія / Лисенко А. А. - К., 2002. - 173с.

31.     Новикова Н. В. Новообразование в современной научной фантастике: автореферат дис. на соискание науч. степени  канд. филол. наук: спец.: 10.02.04 «Германские языки» / Новикова Н. В. – М., 1988. – 21с.

32.     Степанюк Н. В. Засоби інтерпретації іншокодових повідомлень у тексті: автореферат дис. на здобуття наук. ступеня  канд. філол. наук: спец. 10.02.04 «Германські мови» / Степанюк Н. В. - Одеса, 2002. - 16с.

33.     Тесленко Т. Н. Жанровая специфика перевода научной фантастики: автореферат дис. на здобуття наук. ступеня  канд. філол. наук: спец. 10.02.20 «Порівняльно-історичне і типологічне мовознавство» / Тесленко Т. Н. – Одеса, 1989. - 16с.