*112528*
Duryagin I.V., Ivanov I.I.
SI “Crimea State Medical University named after S. I. Georgievsky”
Impact of endometrial hyperplasia on
the immunohystochemical index of steroid hormones receptors
As we know the endometrial hyperplasia (EH) is the non-invasive
endometrium proliferation morphologically manifesting with impairment of
stromal-vascular balance, epithelial-stromal balance, appearance of different
shape and size glands clinically manifesting with dysfunctional bleedings.
According to various sources about 50% women of fertile and predecidual age suffer from EH with 3-14%
frequency of endometrial cancer development. Also we should notice this
pathology ‘cause of its «rejuvenation», juvenile uterine bleedings compose 20-40% of adolescent age gynecological
pathologies.
The target of our investigation is the determination of histological
changes in endometrium constitution and to determine receptor sensibility of
endometrial cells to estrogen and progesterone in case of such pathology, also
we determine the expression level and division of receptors in a tissue. For
all of this we use immunohystochemical method as the combination of
immunological and hystochemical methods.
The materials for our investigation are 42 fragments of endometrium
received during the fractional diagnostic curettage in women aged of 22 to 48
years who applied with complaints connected with acyclic and/or profuse
bleedings usually appearing after the menischesis. 9 patients were up to 30
years old, 15 patents were 30 to 40 and 18 patients were above 40 years old.
During the investigation in 29 cases simple hyperplasia without atypia was
verificated, in 8 cases was the complex hyperplasia without atypia, 3 cases
were the simple atypical hyperplasia and in 2 cases complex atypical
hyperplasia was verificated.
During the examination of 4 types of endometrial hyperplasia
morphological features define changes of estrogen (Er) and progesterone (Pr)
receptors expression activity was found. The impairment of impairment of
stromal-vascular balance and increasing of mitotic activity were distinctive
for all types of endometrial hyperplasia. Glands throughout had different
sizes, branchy shapes with multiple excrescences and appendixes and such
phenomenon as «gland in gland».
During the histological investigation 29 patients had such changes in
endometrium: the number of glands is increased and most of them have irregular
shape with multiple excrescences and appendixes, with singular (less frequently
plural) cystic-enhanced glands lined with inline flattened prismatic epithelium
with roundish normochromic nucleuses and homogeneous eosinophilic cytoplasm.
Glands everywhere were divided against each other with thick layer of stroma.
Such a picture corresponds the simple endometrial hyperplasia without atypia.
During the immunohystochemical investigation moderately expressed
expression of Er in nucleuses of gland’s epithelium and stromal cells was found
(it was 60 to 70%, 67.5±2,1% average).
8 cases of complex hyperplasia without atypia were accompanied with
changes similar to previous type, however this changes were more expressed and
glands were placed closely to each other divided with thin stromal septum.
Nuclear-cytoplasmic balance impairment was pointed in the direction of nucleus’
square increase, among them hyperchromic nucleuses were found. During the
immunohystochemical investigation strongly expressed expression of Er in
nucleuses of gland’s epithelium and stromal cells (887,5±2,5%) and Pr were
weakly expressed in nucleuses of epithelial cells (28,3±1,7%) and singular
stromal cells (25±2,5%).
In 3 cases simple atypical endometrial hyperplasia was marked. In
addition attributes of simple hyperplasia without atypia were marked, however
at the same time they were accompanied with cytological changes such as nuclear
atypia (different sizes and shapes, different susceptibility degree for stain
with the appearance of hypo- and hyperchromic nucleuses), irregular cytoplasm
eosinophilia. This patients had weakly
expressed expression of Er in nucleuses of glandular cells (25±3,5%) and
stromal cells (20±1,6%), Pr had low staining in glandular cells and no staining
in stromal cells.
In the case close location of glands in typical cytological
manifestations biopsies were verificated as the complex atypical hyperplasia (2
cases). The complex atypical hyperplasia is characterized with compact location
of glands and micropapillar formations, in singular glands they form epithelial
septum.
As the result of this investigation we can say that Er expression is the
most expressed in the case of simple hyperplasia without atypia and the less
expressed in the case of complex atypical hyperplasia. Pr expression was
strongly decreased in all the cases but in the case of complex atypical
hyperplasia it was mostly decreased.
The analyze of gained information in accordance with the age of patients
says about absence of precise correlation between the age of patients and
expression degree both of estrogen and progesterone. For example the highest
level of estrogen expression was equal both in young women and women elder than
40 years in case of simple hyperplasia without atypia and the lowest level was
in the patients of all ages with complex atypical hyperplasia.
Conclusions:
1. Estrogen and progesterone receptors are marked in almost all the
types of typical or atypical endometrial hyperplasia.
2. At the non-atypical endometrium hyperplasia high and moderate level
of Er was marked in combination with moderate and low level of Pr in stromal
and glandular cells without depending of patients’ age.
3. Atypical hyperplasia is accompanied with sharp decreasing of Er and
Pr expression in all structures of endometrium without depending of patients’
age.
4. Immunohystochemical method is the important diagnostic test which
should be used as the prognosis method for the definition of atypical
processes’ expression degree and correction of appropriate treatment.