Second year student of
the Faculty of Accounting and Economics,
Ovsova Ekaterina
PhD in Philosophy, Petrova Yulia Andreevna
Rostov State University
of Economics (RIPE)
Principles of defining
dreams in Psychology.
Multiple researches on the topic
«dreams» took a significant place in science for
the last thousand years. Such sciences as: psychology, philosophy,
medicine, cognitive anthropology, linguistics, sociology were interested in
this phenomenon. During this period of
time, different ideologies, scientific paradigms and
approaches were offered. According to
psychology, the elements of dreams are closely related to the settings. It has
been proved that the presence of colors in our dreams is the result of
appearance of colored media. Psychologists believe that people of the black and
white media era used to have black and white dreams more often than colored
ones. In the XX century the foundation of modern approach to a subjectivity
problem on the
topic «dreams» in anthropology and linguists
brought new theories to this research. A great contribution to this
investigation was based on the book «Interpretation of Dreams» (1899) written
by S. Freud. [1]
Sigmund Freud developed psychoanalysis, a method through which an analyst «unpacks»
unconscious conflicts, based on free associations, dreams and fantasies of the
patient. His theories on child’s sexuality, libido and ego, among other topics,
were some of the most influential academic concepts of the XXth century.
In his book «Interpretation of Dreams»,
Sigmund Freud introduced the theory of «unconscious» relatively to the
interpretation of dream, and also at first discussed phenomenon, which later
became the theory of the Oedipus complex. Freud enlarged the content of his
book at least eight times and, in the third edition, added an extensive section
which described dream symbolism very literally. [2]
Freud began his
book from the first chapter titled «The Scientific Literature on the Problems
of the Dream» by reviewing different scientific views on the interpretation of
dreams, which he found interesting but not adequate. Then he made an argument
by describing a number of dreams which illustrated his theory. Sigmund Freud’s
theory of dreams suggested, that dreams - is a presentation of instinctive
thoughts, desires and motivations. According to Freud’s psychoanalytical view,
people are flown by aggressive instincts that are repressed from conscious
realizations. While these thoughts are not consciously expressed, Freud
suggested that they find their way into our realization of dreams. He
consolidated that bad dreams allow the brain to gain control over the feelings
emerging from distressful experiences. He also described two different
important components of dreams: «obvious content» and «latent content». The obvious content is made up of the actual
thoughts, images and content contained in dreams. All the same time the latent
content is introduced by the hidden psychological meaning of our dreams. The
hidden dream - is a part of day impressions (the perceived images, the
considered thoughts, experiences), which people experience during the day time,
in the waking state, and completely realize what has happened with them
(conscious), or actually don’t realize, but can remember them freely
(preconscious). Another main part of our hidden dreams is situated in
unconscious part of our brain - in that sphere of mentality where unconscious
desires live. The content of unconscious, unlike the content of preconscious, a
person can't realize according to his wish. Freud’s theory of the
interpretation of dreams gave the first step in the study of this problem and
still remains popular and very interesting nowadays. [3]
«Dreams…are not meaningless…they are completely
valid psychological phenomenon, the performance of wishes… constructed through
highly complicated intellectual activity» Sigmund Freud.
Freud laid the foundation of the theory,
which fathered a great number of other researches in this sphere: analytical
psychology of K.G. Jung, individual psychology of A. Adler, Freydo-Marxism of
E. Fromm. [1]
Carl Jung, a Swiss psychiatrist suggested
that dreams compensate for one-sided feelings, which transfer into conscious.
He considered that the dream should be understood not simply as the difficult
riddle invented unconscious which should be deciphered for disclosure of the
causal factors standing behind it. Dreams can't serve as lie detectors, which
would open dishonesty of conscious installation. Dreams are unconscious, they
have their own language. Being representations of unconscious, the images in
dreams are self-sufficient and have their own logic. Jung believed that dreams
may contain important messages, philosophical ideas, illusions, wild ideas, memory,
plans, irrational experience and even telepathic enlightenments. Another
interesting view of interpretation of dreams was enlightened by Ferenczi, a
Hungarian psychoanalyst. «A dream expresses something that cannot be expressed
directly». Other theories suggest that dreams involve one's repressed emotions
that are fantasized during our sleep. Hartmann believes that dreams give a
person an opportunity to organize thoughts. Griffin, in his research has
proposed the expectation fulfillment theory of dreaming, according to which
dreaming completes patterns of emotional expectations. [4]
In the
conclusion, we would like to point out that Sigmund Freud and Karl Jung made a
great contribution in studying of psychology of dreams. In everyday life we
allocate significant value for psychological sense of dreams, than for
biological. Under activity of dreams we consider processes which transform
unrealized experiences of the person and dream during wakefulness to a dream
where all experience and imaginations are implemented. The dream doesn’t arise
without reasons in our life, its presence is connected with any problems of a
person. Also we share the point of view of analytical psychology of Jung, that
unconscious in dreams shows us the conceptions expressed by metaphorical
language, the main purpose of which is to restore the broken mental balance.
Literature
1. Ëüâîâ, Àëåêñàíäð Âàëåðüåâè÷ «Äèññåðòàöèÿ íà òåìó: Ôåíîìåí ñíîâèäåíèÿ â ôèëîñîôñêîé àíòðîïîëîãèè», 2007.
2. http://ezoterik.org/sonnik_Fryeida/sonnik_Fryeida.php
3. Ôðåéä Ç. Ââåäåíèå â ïñèõîàíàëèç:
Ëåêöèè. Ì.: Íàóêà, 1991. 456 ñ.
4. Jung, C.G. (1902) The associations of normal
subjects. In: Collected Works of C. G. Jung, vol. 2. Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press, pp. 3–99.