Deontological measuring of national law-making
As the Ukrainian scientists specify, for jurisprudence it is necessary
to acknowledge, that disorganization processes in society are natural,
objective and make the necessary element of social development, and that is why
it is necessary to give the men legal valued guidelines for life in a state of
vagueness, instability, chaos[1].
Research of deontology of national law-making is
needed from point of pushing away from opposite. Deontological measuring
provides with the legal phenomena the line of demarcation between a right as
value and invalue. So, according to A. Kozlovskyi,
an invalue right can be shown in such forms:
1) when it is used
in illegal aims, by passing illegal acts, normative acts which conflict with
human rights;
2) when it is not used consciously
for realization of justice of existent authority;
3) when,
leaning against principle of stability and authority of law, authority stands against
legal registration of necessary changes;
4) when social relations are normatively overregulated and thus harm is inflicted to social development[2] [2, c.189].
Deontology of national law-making
products a sphere of invalued in a right, that is included in radical
divergences from
natural measuring of
understanding of right.
Actuality of researching of deontology of national
in law-making predetermined yet and that by a ponderable question which must be
decided in a theory and practice of right, is overcoming of extremes of social self-organization,
exposure of golden mean, between
embodiment ontological national and by deviant rejections predefined this
embodiment. It is justly marked in legal literature that for the theorists of
right more deep study of mechanisms of legal acculturation and introduction of
modern right will be needed in the traditional legal systems, with the detailed
consideration of problem of perception of new legal norms a man[3].
Legal acculturation is carried out not only under influence process of law-creating
but also in unison with the row of other legal phenomena, as here legal
education, law-application and realization activity. Fully successful legal acculturation
not accessible, as introduction of any legal institute results in his
distortion within the framework of new legal culture. Next to it law-creating
is on soil of national is a value which is tested sometimes within the limits
of this state, that is why implemented in consciousness of subjects of
realizations adjusted rigorismical and with adjusted temporal amplitude.
An openness and reserve
of national law-creating must be in an equilibrium, and|but| actually, frankness for new, abnormal and unexplored
must be assured in the same measure, as a complexity of duties and correlativeness of norms. Thus the system of norms of one culture does not
mean the exception of
norms of other
cultures, including
tolerance, that inability to glue on the labels of abnormalness on any lives forms which differ from it. On this background some national legal cultures
destroy the legal values of other cultures literally, deform a national legislation,
legal practice, negatively affect
legal mentality of people.
Movement to legal harmony is
not accessible on the road
of the hasty borrowing of legislation, legal ideology, organizational forms of existence of right. In
modern legal reality there are the legal systems which|what| in relation to other aggressive, aim to subordinate them legal development to the norms, principles, procedures, by a decision et cetera. Using, above all things, economic and political pressure alien
legal values intrude upon swiftly, national law-creating is paralysed, deprive
ontological measuring national legislation, legal mentality and legal practice
is deformed. In these
terms the maintainance
of national idea means moving
toward legal harmony,
provides assertion by|by means of| the right of principles of formal
equality, freedom and
justice.
A national legal culture, legal mentality, keep the unique limits of every people on a background
moving towards all more complete embodiment of rights and freedoms of man[4].
It is marked in legal literature, that the mechanical borrowing of international
law principles, institutes and norms, [5]quite often creates a "foreign body" in
the national legal system, causes contradiction during realization of laws and
other normative acts[6].
In this connection the very relevant use of our own legal inheritance,
continuation of his traditions, more active introduction, [7][8]in legal practice of achievements of domestic legal
science, development of normatively legal base and state institutes which
answer legal mentality and state ideology of people of Ukraine[9].
[1] Оботов Ю.Н. Традиции и обновление в
правовой сфере : вопросы теории (от познания к постижению права) / Ю.Н.
Оботов.- Одесса: Юридична література,
2002 .- 280 с. С.19
[2] Козловський А. А.
Право як шзнання: Вступ до гносеологи права. —
Чершвщ: Рута. — 1999. — 295 с.С. 189.
[3]
Ковлер А. И. Ковлер А. И. Антропология права. — М.: Норма-Инфра-М., 2002. -
С. 26.
[4] Оботов Ю.Н. Традиции и обновление в правовой сфере : вопросы теории (от познания к постижению права) / Ю.Н. Оботов.- Одесса: Юридична література, 2002 .- 280 с. С. 155
[5] Оботов Ю.Н. Традиции и обновление в правовой сфере : вопросы теории (от познания к постижению права) / Ю.Н. Оботов.- Одесса: Юридична література, 2002 .- 280 с. С. 155
[6]
Баранов В. М., Пшеничнов М. А. Гармонизация
законодательства России:
философские и правовые аспекты // Философия права. — 2000. — №1. — С.
43.
[7] Оботов Ю.Н. Традиции и обновление в правовой сфере : вопросы теории (от познания к постижению права) / Ю.Н. Оботов.- Одесса: Юридична література, 2002 .- 280 с. С. 155
[8]
Баранов В. М., Пшеничнов М. А. Гармонизация
законодательства России:
философские и правовые аспекты // Философия права. — 2000. — №1. — С.
43.
[9]
Оборотов Ю. М. Юридичний образ постмодерну
/Науковх пращ Одесь-ко1 нащонально1
юридичжн академи. — Т. 1. — О.: Юрид. лгг. — 2002. - С. 97-103.