V.Mykhaylenko, R. Fylypiuk,

                                                                              M. Prun’, L.Petraschuk, N.Stefak

                                                                                Bukovyna State Finance Academy 

                                                        Chernivtsi, Ukraine

 

                  THE CONCEPT OF MONEY LEXICAL REPRESENTATION

 

Words: The paper is focused on the various on the semantic (definitional and componentional) analysis of the lexeme money which represents the concept money in the  anglophone world view.

Key units: concept, conceptual system, lexeme, lexical domain, component, semantics, cognitive.

 

      There are four approaches in cognitive research bearing the name semantics: logical semantics, linguistic semantics, psychological semantics, and cognitive semantics.. It is currently leaning toward describing experience and consciousness  (→CONSCIOUSNESS, EXPERIENCE), which brings it closer to phenomenology and transcendental philosophy [2].For Mark Johnson, universal semantic structures condition our experience and the formation of selfhood (→IDENTITY) [3, 999–1008]. He therefore concludes along with R.Jackendoff that the semantic structure is the conceptual structure (→CONCEPT), or as R.W.Langacker put it, that meaning is identified with conceptualization (→MEANING AND SIGNIFICATION) [4]. There are many different ways to approach the problems of meaning, since meaning is related to many different functions of language. Within Cognitive Semantics, one attempts to account for prototype effects of concepts. A concept is often represented in the form of an image schema and such schemas can show variations just like concepts normally do [1, 24-25]

       If one challenges logical theories of the concept—as every approach to cognitive semantics has done to a greater or lesser extent—then one must devise a theory of ideas that fits into a linguistic framework. This is the pathway proposed in particular by R.W.Langacker, in his statement that linguistic semantics must undertake the structural analysis and explicit description of abstract entities like thoughts and concepts.

       Money is considered as anything accepted by people in exchange  for the things the sell or the work the do. But today, money consists mainly of paper bills, coins made of various metals, and checking account deposits [6, 704-705].  The function of money in economy are the following:

       Money supply is total stock of money in the economy, consisting primarily of currency in circulation and deposits in savings and checking accounts. Too much money in relation to the output of goods tends to push interest rates down and push prices and inflation up; too little money tends to push interest rates up, lower prices and output, and cause unemployment and idle plant capacity.

      Money has three main uses: a medium of exchange, second, a unit of account, third, a store of wealth.

      Thus, in cognitive linguistics money is a concept which is a constituent of the conceptual system of “money”. And then in the process of a further cognition three subsystems can be revealed:

1)     a medium of exchange,

2)     a unit of account,

3)     a store of wealth.

     The whole system with its subsystems can be represented by the dominant lexeme “money”. Here we can speak of lexical domain membership principal, according to which the lexical domain membership is determined by the genus constituting the nucleus of the meaning of a lexeme: money à a medium of exchange; a unit of account; a store of wealth [see: Semantic Graphic Thesaurus]. The number of  components is not limited and it may expand due to special branch dictionaries. Let’s compare the definitions of the lexeme money in the encyclopedic and special dictionaries.

The Encyclopedic Dictionary gives a universal definition including economic and non-economic components:

1. Standard pieces of gold, silver, copper, nickel, etc., stamped by government authority and used as a medium of exchange and measure of value; coin or coins (also called hard money).

2. Any paper note issued by a government or an authorized bank and used in the same way; bank notes; bills (also called paper money).

3. Any substance or article used as money, as bank notes, checks, etc.

4. Any definite or indefinite sum of money.

5. Property; possessions; wealth.

6. Very wealthy persons or groups.

7. Any form or denomination of legally current money.

8. Money of account.

9. Money won as a prize.

10.Sums of money.

As for its broad specialization (Economy) the definition ‘money’ in the Dictionary of Economic Terms includes the following constituents:

         1) a medium of exchange for payments between consumers, businesses, and government;
         2) a unit of account for measuring purchasing power, or the prices paid for goods and services;

         3) a store of value for measuring the economic worth of current income deferred for spending in future years

The Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms defines that money – it legal tender as defined by a government and consisting of currency and coin. In a more general sense, money is synonymous with cash, which includes negotiable instruments, such as checks, based on bank balances.

Then we shall consider the definition of “money” with the one given in The Dictionary of Banking Terms from the point of its narrow specialization (Banking):                       

         1.A medium that can be exchanged for goods and services and is used as a measure of their values on the market, including among its forms a commodity such as gold, an officially issued coin or note, or a deposit in a checking account or other readily liquefiable account.

         2.The official currency, coins, and negotiable paper notes issued by a government.

         3.Assets and property considered in terms of monetary value; wealth.
         4.A current medium of exchange in the form of coins and banknotes, coins and banknotes.

          In the “Money” fragment of the English world view the lexeme “money” distinguishes between three core components:

-      Component 1 is currency held by the public, plus travelers' checks, demand deposits. –

-      Component 2 includes Component 1 plus savings and small denomination time deposits,Money Market Demand Accounts, shares in Money Market Mutual Fundsheld by individual investers.

-      Component 3 includes Component 2 plus large time deposits, large denomination repurchase agreements, shares in Money Market Mutual Funds held by institutional investors, and certain Eurodollar deposits in foreign branches of U.S. banks.

The meanings of words in a language are interrelated and they are defined in part by their relations with other words in the language. After the careful examination of all data from the available lexicographic manuals, we arrive to a new definition that is to be regarded as a cluster of semantic components. However this cluster is not arranged in a casual (taxonomic) manner since the criterion for lexical domain membership becomes its overriding factor.

      The componential analysis of a set of related linguistic items, especially the components of the meaning of the lexeme, into combinations of features in terms of which each item may be compared with every other, as in the analysis of  the meaning of the lexeme “money” into the semantic components (or semes):

1. officially coined or stamped metal currency;

2. money of account;

3. paper money;

4. wealth reckoned in terms of money;

5. an amount of money;

6.(plural) sums of money: funds;

7. a form or denomination of coin or paper money.

Analyzed in the same semantic domain, words can be classified according to shared and differentiating features. Breaking down the sense of a word into its minimal distinctive features, the componential analysis of meaning can be a semantic approach to determine the meaning of a word. The lexical semantic domain of “money” as a medium of exchange, a measure of value, or a means of payment may include: bread, bucks, cabbage, cash, change, chips, coin, currency, dough, gold, green, jack, kale, legal tender, long green, loot, lucre, needful, pelf, scratch, shekels, tender, wampum, etc.

The  lexeme “money” (N1)  reveals its semantic components due to the lexical grammatical combinability in the following word combinations:

 bank money, be short of money, big money, blood money, for love or money,  make money on the side,  money belt, money box,  money changer, money cowry,  money dealer, money doesn't grow on trees, money handler, money laundering, money lender, money loan, money manager, money market, money match, money order, money plant, money supply, money talks,  money value, money-bag, money-box, money-grubber, money-making, money-making business, money-making venture, money-market liquidity, money-spinner, old money, paper money, pay in money, pay money into, pay money into a bank, pocket money, pocket-money, public money, put money into,  ready money, soft money, deposit money, money market, money supply.

       We have analyzed the combinability oh the phrase level, on the semi-sentence level, and on the sentence level:

N + N1; N1 + N; Adj+ N1; N1 + Ving; N1 + Ving + N; V + N1 + Prep; V + N1 + Prep + N; Prep + N + Conj + N1;  V + N1 + Prep + det + N; N1 + Vaux + Neg + Vinf + Prep +N (pl.); Vbe + Adj + Prep.G. + N1.

    The linguistic cognitive analysis helped to model the conceptual system of “money” and its representation in language – a lexical semantic domain of “money’ [see the applicative result of the analysis: 5, 173-175]. Cognitive semantics is still rather undeveloped but has also offered new insights into the mechanisms of metaphors. Its strength lies mainly in the analysis of lexical items Although componential analysis has some difficulties and limitations in its application, it is still used alongside with the definitional one modern linguistics.

 

REFERENCE:

1. Allwood Jens S., Gärdenfors Peter. Cognitive Semantics: Meaning and cognition / Jens S. Allwood, Peter Gärdenfors .  - Amsterdam ; Philadelphia : J. Benjamins Pub. Co., 1999. – 201p.

2. Jackendoff R. Foundations of  Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution.              / R. Jackendoff. - Oxford, England; New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.     

-709 p.

3. Johnson-Laird P. Mental Models, Deductive Reasoning, and the Brain / P.Johnson-Laird // M.Gazzaniga (Ed.). The Cognitive Neurosciences. - Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995. - Pp. 999–1008.

4. Langacker Ronald W. Concept, Image, and Symbol : The Cognitive Basis of Grammar / Ronald W. Langacker. – London: Mouton De Gruyter, 2002. – 395p.

5. Mykhaylenko V. V. Conceptual analysis in finance domain teaching // ²Õ ̳æí. íàóê.-ïðàêò. êîíô. «Ñòðàòåã³ÿ òà ìåòîäè íàâ÷àííÿ ìîâ äëÿ ñïåö³àëüíèõ ö³ëåé. Êè¿â, 2009. – Ñ.173-175.

6. The World Book Encyclopedia.-Vol.13. - Chicago: World Book, Inc., 1994. - Pp.704-719.