Ïåäàãîã³÷í³ íàóêè
Ñó÷àñí³
ìåòîäè âèêëàäàííÿ
Ëàð³íà
Î.Ñ., Ñóõîâåöüêà Ñ.Â., Îòäºëüíîâà Ë.Ë.
Æèòîìèðñüêèé
äåðæàâíèé òåõíîëîã³÷íèé óí³âåðñèòåò
Critical thinking as an approach to the teaching in ESP classes
Nobody is an
absolute beginner when it comes to critical
thinking. Our most everyday activities require us to
make use of some of the basic skills involved in
critical thinking, such as: working out
whether we believe what we see or hear; taking
steps to find out whether something is likely to be
true; arguing our own case if someone
doesn't believe us.
However, just
because we can think critically this doesn't
mean we always do, or that we do it well. This is
to be expected, as we don't need to employ the
same level of critical thinking for everything we
do.
For everyday
activities, we take a certain amount on trust, and
this saves us from having to recheck every
detail. We have to decide on how much
information is really required and what level
of doubt is acceptable for each new circumstance. The levels and types of
knowledge we need vary depending on the task,
such as whether we are simply switching on a
light, inventing a new form of electrical
circuit or treating someone for electrocution.
Similarly, critical thinking involves: identifying
correctly when we need to gain more
information; selecting effectively the right type
and level of information for the purpose.
Success in
most professions requires good critical thinking skills. Academic study also
requires increasingly sophisticated levels of critical analysis at every level
of study. And the process of learning foreign languages is not an exception.
Referring to the study, you may be expected to apply critical thinking to: what
you hear, see, and do; the material you read; how you interpret new situations
and events; what you write, say or present to other people.
But it should
be explained what is meant by critical thinking and everyone must develop their
own reasoning skills. These skills are essential to those progressing to higher
levels of academic study, whether at advanced or degree level. However, the
underlying concepts are useful to anyone who wishes to: understand the concepts
used in critical thinking; develop clearer thinking; interpret and produce
argument more effectively; be more observant of what they see and hear.
The use of critical thinking will assist you in
practical ways such as helping you to:
·
recognize
and understand the technical terms in critical thinking so you know what other
people are referring to when they mention these, and so you can apply them
yourself as relevant;
·
build
confidence in your own ability to apply critical thinking techniques;
·
examine
closely the opinions, views and arguments presented by other people;
·
challenge
other people’s views from an informed perspective when this is appropriate.
It is also particularly helpful for students in
developing the ability to:
·
recognize
the arguments of specialist authors;
·
locate
arguments in key texts with greater speed;
·
engage
with the arguments used by both experts and their peers;
·
produce
better critical analytical writing of their own for marked assignments;
·
recognize
the difference between critical analysis and other kinds of writing, such as
description.
Taking into
the consideration that the study of foreign languages (for example, English)
must be closely connected with the future profession of students, ESP is the
main aspect in teaching it. That is why; the great part of texts contains
specific information and terminology, the description of different scientific phenomena.
The work with scientific literature requires not only getting general and
specific information but also includes the process of thinking and critical
approach to cause-and-effect relations in the text.
Students are
expected to develop critical thinking skills so that they can dig deeper below
the surface of the subjects they are studying and engage in critical dialogue
with its main theories and arguments. This is usually through engaging in
critical debate in seminars, presentations or writing produced for assessment
or publication.
One of the
best ways of arriving at a point where we really understand something is by
doing, or replicating, the underlying research for ourselves. However, as
undergraduates, and indeed in everyday life, there simply isn't the time to
research everything we encounter. The depth of understanding that comes through
direct experience, practice and experimentation has to be replaced, at times,
by critical analysis of the work of other people.
Students need
to develop the ability to critically evaluate the work of others. Whilst some
find this easy, others tend to accept or apply the results of other people’s
research too readily, without analyzing it sufficiently to check that the
evidence and the reasoning really support the main points being made. Bodner
(1988), for example, describes chemistry students as being unable to “apply
their knowledge outside the narrow domain in which it was learnt. They ‘know’
without understanding.” Bodner suggests that, instead of focusing primarily on
standard chemical calculations in books, students should be looking for answers
to questions such as “How do we know …?” and “Why do we believe …?”
Bodner’s
description is likely to be just as true of students in other subjects. It is
not unusual for students and for people generally, to rely unquestioningly on
research that is based on a small sample of the population, or that is based on
faulty reasoning, or that is now out of date. Evidence from small or isolated
projects is often treated as if it was irrefutable proof of a general
principle, and is sometimes quoted year after year as if it were an absolute
truth.
Good critical
thinking skills bring numerous benefits such as:
·
improved
attention and observation;
·
more
focused reading;
·
improved
ability to identify the key points in a text or another message rather than
becoming distracted by less important material;
·
improved
ability to respond to the appropriate points in a message;
·
knowledge
of how to get your own point across more easily;
·
skills
of analysis that you can choose to apply in a variety of situations.
Skills in
critical thinking bring precision to the way you think and work. You will find
that practice in critical thinking helps you to be more accurate and specific
in noting what is relevant and what is not. The skills listed above are useful
to problem-solving and to project management, bringing greater precision and
accuracy to different parts of a task.
Although
critical thinking can seem like a slow process because it is precise, once you
have acquired good skills, they save you time because you learn to identify the
most relevant information more quickly and accurately.