Ôèëîëîãè÷åñêèå
íàóêè/1. Ìåòîäèêà ïðåïîäàâàíèÿ ÿçûêà è ëèòåðàòóðû
Kobryushko Ihor
Dniepropetrovsk National University, Ukraine
Case Use in a Non-Case Environment
The instructor who would like
to teach with cases in an institution where , normally, other methods of
teaching are prevalent may encounter some special problems. The non-case
environment poses obstacles of various kinds, including inadequate facilities,
problems in student identification, material logistics and timetabling, student
numbers and apathy, and lack of institutional rewards. These will affect how
and whether cases can be used, and some interesting approaches have been
developed by enterprising case teachers.
It can be easily appreciated
that the most immediate obstacles to teaching with cases in non-case
environment are those which can be identified as: 1.facilities,
2.
student identification, and 3. materials.
It is to be expected that in a
non-case environment adequate facilities for case discussion will be lacking.
It is up to the instructor to make the decision whether to accept the physical
facilities as they are, or to attempt certain modification. It might be naive
to suppose the institutional support for such changes would be great. The
instructors , which use cases, indicate the problems they thought they faced,
and, in some cases, how they overcome them.
Usually there is a set for the
traditional lecture method of teaching in our classrooms : a single fixed board
and the blackboard space is very limited. You are lucky enough to get an
overhead projector, but there is a small portable screen. It is the first
obstacle to use the case method not
paying attention to the physical facilities. Does the layout of the classroom encourage or discourage
participation? As a rule, students sit at their desks for the traditional lecture method of teaching. It is
very difficult to carry out a case discussion in a classroom where students
talk to the backs of the heads of rows of students in front of them.
Cases have been used in the
business history and economics programs in many high schools for a number of
years. But there are some important problems which teachers can meet while delivering the classes: a small class
size and the use of a student moderator, and also a special timetabling
arrangement.
The case studies are based on
realistic problems or situations and are
designed to motivate and actively engage students. Every case discussion must
be linked to the topic studied. Students use the language and communication skills
which they have acquired while working through the topic. Typically students
are involved in discussing problems proposed and recommending solutions through
active group work. All of the case studies must be developed and tested with
the students and designed to be easy to present and use.
It is the moderator’s job to see that
everyone gets an opportunity to be heard, that no two or three class members
are allowed to monopolize the discussion, and that the group moves steadily
from a full statement and evaluation of the issues to a reasoned consensus
solution. This approach, in itself, is an extremely valuable learning
experience for the student moderator.
Even though significant
difficulties may exist, a number of ways of using cases have been experimented
with by instructors in non-case environments. They may include adjustments to
timetables, special case selection, interesting uses in class, and variety of
other approaches.
It is clear that instructors
in a non-case environment have to find
ways and means of quickly explaining to students why they wish to use cases and
how they intend to use them. It is logical that I non-case environment s
students find the use of cases different , if not difficult , and may lack an
appreciation of what the instructor is trying to do. Sometimes, also, the
numbers are so large that case discussion does not seem to be a reasonable
option.
Teaching with cases in a
non-environment presents some special challenges and risks to the instructor.
Significant obstacles may lie in the way and the aspiring case teacher might do
well to recognize their existence. Many instructors have found that such
problems may not be insurmountable. Efforts to overcome them include a strong
notice, to faculty and students alike, that the instructor is serious about the
educational intent. Making clear to students why and how cases will be used is
a task which falls squarely on the case teacher’s shoulders. Repeated
explanation may well be necessary along with demonstration of expected behavior
in class and with the appropriate reinforcements. There are just too many other
influences in the environment to make the familiarization process an easy one.
Perhaps the most difficult challenge of all lies in the area of institutional
apathy and the lack of recognition for quality case teaching. Many instructors
have proven they can not only survive but even thrive by using cases in
non-case environments.