Criteria for evaluating of visual
merchandising
Galun D.
Visual merchandising can be
evaluated by some criteria. The first of them is the
aesthetic judgment, the extent rate of compliance taste actions of aesthetic worldview and its system of valuable dominant. The notion of
taste is meant
here as a set of consumer favorite
aesthetic feelings to aesthetic information in the
form of product visual presentation.
It is worth noting that the emotions and receptors of the individual are
formed in specific cultural and practical environment and guided by the prevailing
idealized abstract concepts and social demands for them. Merchandising standards
applied in the stores and discussed in this article were defined by the specifics of
the individual consumption from concrete target audience.
Man is formed as a practical creature. Evaluation activity is the neñessariest condition for the practice. The success of the
evaluation activity affects directly how the person byes goods, that's why the
objective assessment is determined by the terms of survival (to buy the product
required at most profitable conditions
in the case of visual merchandising).
Hence is the second important criterion for visual merchandising evaluating
– the economic efficiency, ie
the ratio of useful outcomes and resource costs.
Àn experiment was conducted to evaluate the visual
merchandising of these two criteria in two stores to identify the aesthetic and economic efficiency in the
context of comparisons with the terms of the store functioning without
intensive attention to visual merchandising. The visual merchandiser performed
in the store during the experiment daily from 10.00 to 19.00. His main task was
to provide a presentation of the goods at the "beautiful and
artistic" levels, and rank it on a number of aesthetic characteristics or
"good" by the value gradation scale. Staffing consultants had
been reduced by over two units at the same time. The visual merchandiser operated in
another store once a month,
where staffing table was slightly increased (Figure 1).
The visual
merchandising was enhanced by reducing the
sales personnel of the shop B, and the priority was given to the work with customers in the shop M. Figure 2 shows the values of the average daily revenue per person in shift. So the research established
that the economic effect of enhancing
the aesthetics of the goods visual
presentation is comparable with the economic effect
caused by an increase in the vendor staffing table.
It may be concluded on the
direct correlation of technical aesthetics and economy under
the experiment. Indeed, the
product is digested by society in that extent that it
satisfies the welfare stereotypes. These stereotypes,
in turn, are a reflection of the subject
material stereotypes aesthetics prevailing
in the society. The higher the extent, the greater the economic effect ceteris paribus.
Figure 1. Shop economic
efficiency
Figure 2. Shop economic
efficiency
About the author:
• Last name, first name in full. Galun Dmitry
• Degree (if any). Ph.D.
• Name of educational institution. Moscow State University for Design and
Technology
• E-mail address. galund@mail.ru
• Mailing address (be sure to index). 107 113,
Moscow, Russia, 3d Rybinskaya 1/40-41