Makarov Nikolay Viktorovich
SI “Crimea State Medical University named after S. I. Georgievsky”
New methods in proctoplasty in case
of chronic and acute paraproctitis
The target of the investigation is improving of acute and chronic
paraproctitis treatment results.
The most common method of proctoplasty is based on staining of fistulous
canal with methylene blue stain and disjunction of fistulous canal from
external fistula foramen placed on perianal skin, by doing so the disjunction
is made till the wall of rectum in the air of internal fistula foramen, and
then we perform semilunar incision along the anal canal and perianal skin
mucobuccal fold, after this the hydraulic dissection is performed with the
dioxidine and normal saline solution which is injected under the anal canal
epithelial lepidic tissue till the level of anal canal upper fimbria switching
to lower ampullar part of rectum. After this the anal canal epithelial lepidic
tissue is dissected till the level of internal fistulous foramen over the entire
width of semilunar incision, the mobilization of transplantate is performed
together with internal fistulous foramen switching to lower ampullar part of
rectum, besides the mobilization is performed 3-3 cm. higher of dentate line,
the transplantate of 2-3 c. width is formed by two lineal incisions, movable
piece of tissue is captured for the distal part by fenestrated forceps and two separate directive interrupted
sutures are overlapped which fix the base of tissue piece to proximal part of
anal canal in the place of attenuating incisions end, then it is fixed by
separate interrupted sutures which are placed between directive sutures, which
fix wound surface of mobilized segment to proximal part of anal canal wound
surface and form the first layer of stay sutures (3-4 sutures), before the suturing
of stay sutures second layer the excess of removed transplantate which contain
internal fistulous foramen is dissected away on the level of perianal skin then
the suturing of separate interrupted sutures second layer is performed for
fixing of transplantate lips to perianal skin.
The skin incision and skin preparation are two main distinctive features
of this method.
The main reasons that inhibit an achievement of positive result are: the
hydraulic dissection is performed only under the anal canal epithelial lepidic
tissue, which increases traumatization of mucous-muscular fragment and leads to
increase of tissue hemorrhage and appearing of submucous hematomas which
complicate survival rate of mobilized fragment, intramural part of fistula
canal and internal foramen are not sealed so the risk of relapse is increased,
bringing down of a fragment is performed in craniocaudal direction which
determines stronger level of tissues’ tension than in case of translocational
proctoplasty. This tension may lead to retraction or necrotizing of tissue
fragment which may cause such complications as the relapse of fistula or anal
canal stenosis. Also this type of surgical operation cannot be performed in
case of active inflammatory process in pararectal cellular tissue.
Surgical operation by our method is performed by the following technique.
The revision of rectum is performed with the help of rectal mirror. Then
we perform fistula canal intubation for final reconnaissance of its dislocation
towards sphincter fibers. Then fistula canal is stained with solution of
brilliant green and under vision control the separation of fistula canal from
external fistula foramen to rectum wall level, where it is dissected and
sutured. Epulosis of perineal wound is performed by secondary tension. Then we
make posterior wall of anal canal hydraulic dissection by the frontal or back
semicircle, depending on the location of internal foramen, 0,5% solution of
novocain and ceftriaxone are used. Solution is injected in submucous layer to
the upper frontier of anal canal.
The affected anal crypt is dissected as a rhomb-shaped fragment together
with cicatrical tissues. Herewith the inner foramen and intramural area of
fistula canal are opened, after the treatment with small curet and sanitation
with 1% dioxidine solution it is sutured by Albert’s suture.
After this left or right edge of rhomb is continued as the incision
cranially to the level of top and down in order the lines of these incisions
create an angle equal to the rhomb’s upper angle. These two mucous-muscular
fragments are fixed with each other and with the anal canal mucous-muscular
layer by interrupted suture, 2-3 sutures with the interval about 0,3-0,4 cm. In
such a way internal foramen of fistula canal is separated from rectum lumen by
unchanged full-layer segment of anal canal wall.
During the suturing of internal foramen and fragments fixation we use
long absorbable suture material, such as vicryl and the atraumatic needle.
The examples of this manipulation are given below.
Sample 1. Patient B., 63 years old, chronic extrasphincteral
paraproctitis, 4th degree of complexity. Surgery by the proposed
method was performed. Postsurgical period in hospital – 21 days. In a three
month after the control revision no relapse was found.
Sample 2. Patient C., 31 years old, acute ischiorectal paraproctitis.
Surgery by the proposed method was performed. Postsurgical period in hospital –
17 days. In a three month after the control revision no relapse was found.
The declared method of proctoplasty in case of acute and chronic
paraproctitis decreases the chance of disease relapse and its usage allows to
reduce chance of postsurgical incontinence. Also it reduces the time of
postsurgical staying in hospital.