Bilokon O.M., Chevganova V.Ya., Zotsenko M.M.
Poltava National Technical University Named
After Jury Kondratyuk
THE
WELL-BEING OF ECONOMIC
AGENT AND THE MODEL OF THE LIFE CYCLE CONCEPT .
The decision
of an investor depends on the life cycle stage of the object of investment.
Therefore the improvement of the economic agent’s market position trend methods of analysis, life cycle concept
generalization and theoretical substantiation
are timely. The investment capitals movement processes are considered as the nonlinear phenomena in
open dissipative systems. The description of the
similar phenomena determines the generalized approaches of synergy – theory of self-organizing. Calculating
experiment, the life cycle concept base model
being theoretically proved for which, is accepted as the scientific
research method.
Theoretical
methods of scientific abstraction and the deductive method enabled us to assume
the abstract notion “ the well-being of the economic agent” as a vital resource
availability at a certain time, corresponding integrated result of the agent’s
market behaviour and entry conditions.
The
continuous function of the agent’s well-being $ (e, i, t) is accepted, where: e,i –
external and internal factors which are conservative and do not change in the short-term periods. In
this case well-being is only dependent
on the factor of time t. The inclination of the function
is a ratio Δ $ = ($1-$0) to Δt = (t1-t0).
The method
of the theoretical analysis enabled us to divide the function of well-being into two (supply and flow) processes, and to formulate cause and
effect conditions and laws as
differential equations.
Cause
and effect conditions in the supply process are in the statement: the greater
well-being reserve is, it will give more opportunities for its changes.
This law combined with the supply process and well-being changes in time is
formulated as:
(1)
Infinitesimal
change of well-being at an infinitesimal time interval is proportional to the
well-being itself with coefficient of proportionality C.
The general solution to the differential equation looks like:
(2)
Coefficient
C is not a flexible in time (conservative) characteristic, the
parameter of the economic agent, it displays the subjective propensity of the
agent’s actions in the supply process.
Graphically formula (2) is displayed in fig. 1. At
C> 0 the agent is inclined to increase the well-being reserve in time. At C=0 the agent is
inclined to conserve the well-being reserve. At C <0 the agent
is inclined to use the well-being reserve.
Cause
and effect conditions in the flow process are
in the statement: the greater
the rate of well-being $
reproduction b is, it will give more opportunities for its
changes. The law combined with the flow process and well-being changes is
formulated as:
(3)
Infinitesimal
change of well-being at an infinitesimal time interval is proportional to rate
of well-being reproduction with
coefficient of proportionality b.
The general solution for the differential equation is a multiplicative
model:
(4)
Coefficient
b is not a flexible in time parameter
of the economic agent, it displays the subjective propensity of the
agent’s actions in the process of well-being reproduction .
Graphically formula (4) is displayed in fig. 2. At b=1 the
agent recreates well-being in time evenly.
At b> 1 the agent is inclined to the well-being reproduction
rate intensification . At 0 <b <1 the agent is inclined to
the well-being reproduction rate slowing down . At b=0 the agent
is inclined not to recreate well-being.
At b <0 the agent is inclined to withdraw well-being.
Fig. 1 Fig. 2.
The method
of theoretical synthesis enabled the authors to formulate the generalized law
of well-being changes in time:
(5)
Infinitesimal well-being change at an infinitesimal time
interval is proportional to well-being
and its reproduction rate.
The general solution to the differential equation is submitted as the exponential-multiplicative formula:
(6)
The
formula(6) diagrams are displayed in fig. 3 (a,â,c).
Fig. 3 (à) b
<0
Fig. 3 (b) 0 <b <1 Fig. 3 (c) b> 1
The presented theoretical grounds enable us to
accept the exponential-multiplicative economic-mathematical
model hypothesis as the base model for the life cycle concept of the economic
agent.
References:
1. Á³ëîêîíü Î.Ì., ×åâãàíîâà Â.ß.,Çîöåíêî Ì.Ì. Ñèíåðãåòè÷íèé ï³äõ³ä,
îá÷èñëþâàëüíèé åêñïåðèìåíò òà óçàãàëüíåíà àïðîêñèìàö³éíà çàëåæí³ñòü êîíöåïö³¿
æèòòºâîãî öèêëó äëÿ òðåíäîâèõ ³íâåñòèö³éíèõ ïðîãíîç³â.// Íàóêîâèé â³ñíèê ÏÍÒÓ
“Åêîíîì³êà ³ ðåã³îí”, ¹1(2) 2004.- Ñ-73-75.
2. Á³ëîêîíü Î.Ì., ×åâãàíîâà Â.ß.,Çîöåíêî Ì.Ì. Òåîðåòè÷íå îáãðóíòóâàííÿ
åêñïîíåíö³àëüíî-ìóëüòèïë³êàòèâíî¿ ìîäåë³ êîíöåïö³¿ æèòòºâîãî öèêëó îá’ºêò³â
³íâåñòóâàííÿ.// Íàóêîâèé
â³ñíèê ÏÍÒÓ “Åêîíîì³êà ³ ðåã³îí”, ¹4(7) 2005.- Ñ-24-27.
3. Á³ëîêîíü Î.Ì., ×åâãàíîâà Â.ß.,Çîöåíêî Ì.Ì. Äèôåðåíö³àëüí³ ð³âíÿííÿ
äîáðîáóòó, ìîäåëü êîíöåïö³¿ æèòòºâîãî öèêëó îá’ºêòó ³íâåñòóâàííÿ.// Ìàòåð³àëè ²²- ì³æíàðîäíî¿
íàóêîâî-ïðàêòè÷íî¿ êîíôåðåíö³¿ „Ñó÷àñí³ íàóêîâ³ äîñë³äæåííÿ -2006”. Òîì 22.
Åêîíîì³÷í³ íàóêè. -Äí³ïðîïåòðîâñüê: Íàóêà ³ îñâ³òà, 2006.-Ñ-24-27.