Психология и
социология/12. Социальная психология
К.п.н.
Корягина Н.А.
Национальный
исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», Россия
Professional development in
business: gender aspects
Life of
modern person is the rapid succession of events, responsibilities, problems and
other things which have become an integral past of our everyday activity. Many
economic, political, cultural peculiarities of
our dynamic and busy life are constantly putting stable internal
representation of a human being to the test; and, consequently, they raise the
question of identity. All this makes scientists theoretically realize the
process of personal self-determination in the society [5, 8]. This
self-determination can be expressed both in physical, intellectual and moral
terms (personal identity), and in terms of self-association with a certain
social group (social identity) [2, 181].
Methodological
bases of a psychological approach the problem of self-determination study were
founded by S.L. Rubinstein. He investigated problem of professional
determination in the context of determination problem, in the light of his
principle – external causes work through the internal conditions [7,9].
Vocational
determination is realizing the level of one’s own professional abilities, the
structure of professional knowledge incentives and skills; understanding their
compliance with the claims laid by the activity a person; experiencing that
compliance as satisfaction with a chosen occupation [7].
Nowadays
many scientists consider that the demand for socially and psychologically
developed personnel is increasing in the modern society. The emphasis here put
on leaders and businessmen, not just on mere employers. In psychology the guest
ions concerning personality formation of a businessman, his live values, the
specificity of choosing the direction of professional growth, and also the factors influencing a person’s
entering the world of business are poorly investigated. These issues are included
in the problematics of personality determination in business; however, they are
considered fragmentarily and do not allow seeing the integrity of ways, forms
and directions suitable for personality activity [5].
According
to N.L. Ivanova’s study (2009), while assisting a personality to adapt in
business environment, it is necessary to impact the ways of personal activity
of self-determination in business. The mechanism of self-determination as a
process is searching new qualities of a person who appears in a problematic
situation, taking decisions about oneself or one’s place in the environment,
when previous notions turn out to be inappropriate for the situation [5].
Personality
self-determination in business is accompanied by learning standards, rules,
values and other aspects of community that a businessman belongs to. At the
same time a person realizes the idea about his professionally important
qualities, abilities and other characteristics providing professionalisation.
Practically all the professional development theories aim at predicting as
follows: professional choice, career plans, reality of professional
achievements, peculiarities of professional behavior at work, satisfaction from
professional labor, efficiency of educational behavior of a personality,
stability or change of a work place, profession.
Business
as social and vocational environment of personality development is only a part
of psychological investigations objective area; that is why, the problem of
personality self-determination in business is not studied thoroughly. Considering
business as activity and social environment lets scientists make psychological
analysis of a businesslike personality more properly [3; 4]. The necessity of
investigating management gender aspects is determined by active women joining
the management process of economy and appearing a new social group of “business
women”. For Russia gender problems in economy, particularly, the participation
of women in management, are rather actual. During the 20th century
professional employment of women grew rapidly. They actively took part in all
spheres of activity including management [10].
A gender
aspect is a function of objective and subjective phenomena of different levels/
These phenomena are reflected in a role behavior of a personality of
professional self-determination [6].
There are
the following gender aspects: the role of gender as a system of relative
personality behavior in professional self-determination and his/her interaction
in the social environment; the role of gender as a system of specific
expectations in relation to a personality status; that is, his/her
understanding the model of behavior while choosing a profession [8].
The role
of gender is often related to the type of role prescription as a factor of
gender stereotypes. Gender stereotypes, existing in a society, have a great
influence on a process of socialization and professional self-determination of
a personality [8].
One of the
bases for traditional gender stereotype formation on professional
self-determination is division of labor according to sex character. The main
criterion in this division is a biological ability of a woman to bear a child.
The important role in approval of a gender stereotype about social roles
fixedness, depending on a sex character, belongs to Talkota Parson and Robert
Bails mutual gender complementarily concept. They studied gender
differentiation in a structural-functional scheme [9].
Traditional
gender stereotypes impede the process of personality professional
self-determination. According to Sandro Bem and Y. Plek’s androgyny concept
there isn’t only a male or a female role. Otherwise, it may lead to the
dissonance of traditional gender role behavior and idea of social role
prescription [9].
So, the
influence of gender aspects on professional personality self-determination is
not only a process of personality self-actualization, but a choice of a life
course too. It is also interconnection of a personality with social environment
and the gaining of personal social experience.
Activization
of gender research was seen in the middle of the previous century; to a great
extent, owing to feminist movement and to discussion of women discrimination
issues, including a professional area.
The
actuality of the problem consists in the following: on the one hand, professional
self-determination and personality self-realization in business is the result
of influencing many interconnected external and internal factors where gender
is a past of the system. On the other hand, entering business environment and
further professional activity may impact gender identification models, gender
identity and social models of personality behavior accordingly, for example,
styles of leadership.
The
novelty of our research is in investigating theoretical and practical questions
of personality self-determination in business according to a gender
aspect.
Gender is
a complicated system of biological, personal and environmental determinants;
that is why, it should be considered in professional personality
self-determination.
In surveys
there are very few researches about the influence of the activity itself on
gender development and gender identity, especially of a longitudinal nature.
Investigations are more often about the defection of differences in
occupational interest male and female pattern, in professional effectiveness,
career, leadership [10]. There is a necessity in a deep study of the problem
whether gender types and the process of professional self-determination are
interconnected. If yes, how. It is important to understand what is dominant in
this process and what influences the change of masculine-feminine gender
stereotypes: sex assignment or a chosen occupation. It is important to identity
how far these interconnections are measurable
and whether they reflect the changes in self-image and gender roles. We
consider that just gender aspect gives the opportunity to see the peculiarities
of value meaningful sphere of male and female leadership personality, and also
to understand the extent of personal responsibility for one’s vital plans and
prospects. There are some data according to which it is possible to point out
different styles of women and men leadership, different ways of negotiating and
other features, connected with the influence of management activity on a gender
personality development. All in all, nowadays, the gender aspect of
self-determination in business is not studied well enough.
The aim of
our study is: 1) detecting the factors which influence professional
self-determination in business; 2) establishing the connection between gender
and the process of self-determination in business environment.
The object
of investigation is professional
self-determination and management activity in a gender aspect.
The
subject of the research is the problem of professional personality
self-determination in business. Gender aspect.
The
methods of research organizing are as follows:
1)
theoretical
study analysis of professional self-determination and gender identity problems;
2)
testing
techniques:
-
techniques of
studying structure and matter of identity: “Self-description of sex roles” S.
Bam (BSRT), the technique called “Who am I?” of T. Macpartland - M. Koon;
-
test-questionnaire
of interpersonal relations diagnostics of T. Liry in a modified version of L.N.
Sobchik;
-
techniques of
investigating the level of professional self-determination: “Questionnaire of
professional preferences” of G. Holland, personal differential;
-
techniques of
studying personal make-up: multifactorial personality questionnaire of R.
Kettel;
3)
comparative
analysis of the indexes based on test measurement of men and women having their
own business or occupying a leading position.
There was a sample group of 64 testees at
the age from 30 up to 56.
Relying on
the conducted research, we can suppose that professional self-determination to
a greater extent depends on external (favourable) conditions; while personality
self-determination depends on a person himself. It is worth mentioning that
often just negative environmental conditions let somebody show his/her worth;
and, consequently, stand out, be flexible and creative while solving problems.
Gender
identity coinciding with biological and psychological sex character contributes
to successful professional self-determination. Vague gender identity, low
differentiation of sex reference bring down the influence of gender identity as
a mechanism which impacts the choice of values, professional
self-determination.
Personality
male and female characteristics, revealed while defining self-actualization,
are correlative with a traditional description of man and woman and they do not
change in the process of their professional formation. Besides, knowledge and
applying one’s specific personality peculiarities by both sexes enable more
effective mastering management activity.
In the
process of male and female professionalization managers integrate different
ideas: while forming professionally there appears congruence of personality
professional self-representation.
For
example, in Avdulova’s research it is stated that for women, while
professionally self-determination, the main thing is socio-psychological aspect
but for men it is active-professional aspect. Even fulfilling the same
professional activity men and women treat it differently. While planning their
own career women are more often concentrated on a current state of affairs, but
not on a long-term perspective of development [10]. Moreover, the author
asserts that in the process of numerous investigations it became evident that
men and women have far more similar qualities than different ones. Many of
really existing differences may be changed in the course of education, after
changing one’s tenor of life and social expectations. During society
development the traditional notion is becoming vague while hidden women discrimination
is obvious.
To sum it
up, the following conclusion can be made: when choosing the style of leadership
both men and women show really different models of business strategies which
are based not on the gender-role peculiarities but on the demands for
effectiveness. For all this it is necessary to search for models of combining
male and female leadership types while running a firm.
Juxtaposing
the data acquired in the process of analyzing effectiveness of male and female
leadership lets us claim that, a successful man is more “effective” in setting
organizational goals and in a leadership quality parameter.
On the
other hand, a woman is more “effective” in the sphere of personnel motivating,
communicating and decision-making. For
alternatives analysis she derives benefit from knowledge and staff potential.
As for control, men and women exercise it equally successfully. The conclusion
suggests itself: potentials of man-leader and woman-leader advantages are
mutually complementary.
Литература:
1.
Абульханова - Славская
К.А. Социальное мышление личности: проблемы и стратегии исследования
//Психологический журнал. 1994. Том 14. № 4. С. 9-55 .
2.
Андреева Г.М. Психология
социального познания. – М., 2000 – С. 181.
3.
Иванова Н.Л.
Самоопределение личности в бизнесе. – М.-Ярославль: Изд-во МАПН,
«Аспект-Пресс», 2008.
4.
Иванова Н.Л.
Типологические особенности самоопределения представителей менеджмента
бизнес-организаций // Психология обучения. – М., 2009. - № 4. – С. 77-90.
5.
Иванова Н.Л., Румянцева
Т.В. Социальная идентичность: теория и практика. – М.: Изд-во СГУ, 2009.
6.
Кон И.С. Половые
различия и дифференциация социальных ролей // Соотношение биологического и
социального в человеке: Материалы к симпозиуму. – М., 1975. – С. 763-776.
7.
Пряжников Н.С.
Психология труда и человеческого достоинства: учеб. пособие / Н.С. Пряжников,
Е.Ю. Пряжникова. – М.: Академия, 2003. – 480 с.
8.
Смелзер Н. Социология. –
М.: Феникс, 1994.
9. Bem S., The
measurement of psychological androgyny // Journal of Consulting and Clinical
Psychology.- 1974.- Vol.42.- P.165-172.
10. Авдулова Т.П. Гендерные аспекты управленческой
деятельности. - [Электронный ресурс]: статья, Центр дистанционного образования
«Элитариум», 2010. URL: http://www.elitarium.ru