Ïåäàãîãè÷åñêèå
íàóêè/2. Ïðîáëåìû
ïîäãîòîâêè ñïåöèàëèñòîâ
C.p.s., Associate Professor,
Anfimova L.A.
Pedagogical Institute of the South Federal
University, Russia
Innovative high
educational establishments - perspectives
of innovative development and globalization
This article highlights theoretical and
methodological principles of competitiveness, discusses the concept of
competitiveness as applied to the training of future specialists in innovative
high educational establishments. The article presents technologies aimed at the
development of the competitiveness of high educational establishments and
future specialists.
In
modern Russia high education must achieve new hypercompetitive levels, which
are characterized by highly developed science technologies and innovations as
well as globalization of knowledge.
Hypercompetition is the possibility of innovative high educational
establishments to meet the demands of the consumers
of their services due to the implementation of innovative methods and the
development of innovative activities of creative teams. It is impossible to
achieve high competitive levels of education without the reformation of the
work of
foreign language teacher educators. Due to the global character of modern
education we must admit that globalization of education is impossible without
proper knowledge of foreign languages. So, if Russian universities want to
stick to international standards and to compete with the renowned Harvard and
Cambridge Universities we should implement innovative techniques and methods
and technologies developed in the USA and Europe, particularly the Council of
Europe, such as: European Language Portfolio, benchmarking, SWOT-analysis, R-A-C-E, PR-techniques
and development of innovative e-Learning forms and models.
Innovative high educational establishments guarantee competitiveness of cities and regions and attract
not only large-scale businesses and enterprises but also talented youth. One of
the priorities of the South Federal University activities is the popularization
of the university and the achievement of global education standards. It’s
impossible to do without promotion of plurilingualism.
According to Jacques Maurais
and Michael A. Morris “theory and practice are integrated in assessing
the present and future of the new global linguistic order while giving due
attention to the historical legacy of language competition and interaction [4, p.
2]. Mark Fettes argues for reversing the longstanding
approach or practice where nations compete with one another to promote their
own languages, which is all the more pressing in a globalising world where
linguistic competition threatens to escalate. Instead, he advocates developing
geostrategies of interlingualism, i.e. linguistic strategies to foster global
communication in cooperative, equitable ways which promote linguistic
diversity. A cooperative approach might take any of a number of forms including
measured spread of ‘world English’, promotion of plurilingualism [2].
So, nowadays the necessity to reform the work of language
teacher educators is acute due to the globalization of linguistic order. Simon
Borg argues that language teacher education presupposes an understanding of
what specifically it means to be a language teacher, and therefore insight into
the distinctive characteristics of language teachers is central to the work of
language teacher educators. So the author points out some main characteristics
of foreign language teachers,
which he considers to be among the most vital ones: knowledge and command of the target language; ability to organize,
explain and clarify, as well as to arouse and sustain interest and
motivation among students; fairness to students by showing neither favouritism
nor prejudice; availability to students [1, p.6-7].
Being a
foreign language teacher is in many ways unique within the profession of
teaching. Becoming a foreign language teacher, too, is a different process from
that which other future teachers experience. This reality is rooted in the
subject matter of foreign language itself. In foreign language teaching, the
content and the process for learning the content are the same. In other words,
in foreign language teaching the medium is the message [3, p. 302].
Some authors point out the necessity of the
development of new speech technologies based on the usage of a computer and
devices such as CD/DVD/MP3/MP4 players. So, Norbet Pachler, the researcher
from University of London, argues that in order to appreciate the potential benefit and,
importantly, understand its limitations and so resist the unwarranted claims of
eager sales departments it is
useful to know what (speech) technology
is and is not yet capable of. Playing
audio recordings via a computer (or devices such as CD/DVD/MP3 players) – as opposed to a tape
recorder- requires digital, rather than traditional analogue recordings. Digital
audio has a number of advantages over its analogue predecessor [5, p. 54-55]. It is also
important to take into consideration emotions of foreign language learners. Affective needs of learners should be taken
care of. As E. Tschirner pinpoints, language learning is strongly linked with
emotions. Emotions influence learner motivation and what is learned and how it is
learned [6]. So, if we want Russian education to be highly competitive we
should stick to international standards of foreign language learning based on
competence approach. The cultural
component of FL competence should be promoted. To be useful, FL skills need be
based on cultural knowledge. Cultural competence (knowing how to interact
with whom or how to be polite) is an integral part of communicative competence.
References:
1.
Borg, S. The distinctive characteristics of foreign language teachers //
Language Teaching Research, 2006. ¹ 10. P. 3-31.
2. Fettes, M. The
geostrategies of interlingualism // Languages in a Globalising World / Ed. by Maurais J., M.A. Morris. – Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2004. P. 37-46.
3.
Hammadou, J., Bernhardt, E. On being and becoming a foreign language
teacher // Theory into Practice. ¹ 26.
1987. P. 301–306.
4.
Languages in a Globalising World / Ed. by Maurais J., M.A. Morris. – Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2004. – 345 p.
5. Pachler N. Speech
technologies and foreign language
teaching and learning //
Language Learning Journal,
2002. ¹ 26. P. 54-61.
6.
Tschirner E. Language acquisition in the classroom: the
role of digital video // Computer Assisted Language Learning. ¹ 14/3-4. 2001. P
19-305.