Ýêîíîìè÷åñêèå
íàóêè/6. Ìàðêåòèíã è ìåíåäæìåíò
Amirbekova D.K., Master’s candidate
Kazakh British Technical University, Kazakhstan
The
main factors identifying the image of the company
The
high level of competition in industries caused by globalization processes
influences to the customers’ purchasing intentions, willingness to buy products
from one company and ignore others. Such kind of decisions based on the factors
which identify the image of the company and influence to the perception of that
company by stakeholders. The image is mostly characterized by positive
reputation of the company and ability to satisfy customers’ needs with high
quality products for reasonable price. Image of the company can be negative or
positive but it can be shaped and changed. Strengthening factors which identify
image of the company will help to build long – term relationships with
stakeholders and gain market share.
Image
is the part of perception and evaluation processes of the company by
stakeholders. Image of the company has two dimensions. It can be created in the
way company plans to do it, but it can be perceived differently by different
groups of peoples. It means that factors which identify image of the company
have different influence and percept differently.
Process
of forming image of the company has two stages. The first one is development of
positive image of the company. The second one is perception of created image by
stakeholders. So, image of the company can be divided on two categories: the
functional attributes and emotional meanings [1]. Functional attributes are quality, price, and service. These
attributes created by the company in order to bring special message to target
group. Emotional meanings are subjective opinion and perception of the brand. Emotional
meanings connected with the perception of functional attributes and adopting
them with own emotions and subjective opinion about the company. Functional
attributes and emotional meanings influence to the stakeholders and form their
attitude to the image of the company. But there are also other factors which
identify the image of the and can be created by company [2]:
· Corporate identity
· Brand
· Corporate citizenship behavior
· Corporate spirit
Each
company has corporate identity which makes it different from competitors. This
factor includes logo, name of the company. Logo of the company helps to
represent company to the stakeholders and create recognition of the company. Image
of the company cannot be developed without brand. Brand has great impact to the
image of the company but it is hard process to create it. When brand of the company is connected with
company name and in cases where stakeholders associate brand with name of the
company this factor has an effect to the image of the company. Openness to the society
and corporate citizenship behavior identifies the social image of the company. Positive
attitude to society helps to shape positive image. Corporate spirit of the
company connects with its image as a result of corporate culture and sharing
the same ideas and goals. Strong internal connection of employees builds
corporate spirit.
Image
of the company also can be identified by external factor such as industry where
company operates. This external factor cannot be created by company because
perception of industry already influences and identifies the image of company
in a positive or in a negative way. For example, oil and gas industry
associated with high level of salaries, but at the same time with the negative
impact to the environment. So, companies in that industry can have negative
image because of its influence to the ecology. At the same time, companies in
the industry form the image of industry. BP oil spill in Gulf of Mexico in 2010
negatively influenced to the industry and to the company’s image because of
extensive damage to the environment. Also, there was some cases when customers
considering a boycott of BP gasoline stations. Another external factor is image
of home - country of the company. Positive image of home – country creates positive
image of the company because of halo – effect. The same halo – effect occur in
positive perception of one product of the company which affect to the positive
perception of the whole company and it others products.
The
forming of positive image of the company takes long time but it can be ruined
easily. Positioning as a tool helps to create internal factors which identify
image of the company. It designs identity of the company, so it’s clear for
stakeholders and connects with the company. Superior competitive positioning
has four key components [3] such as analyzing own brand and brand of
competitors, creating attributes of own brand which is different from
competitors’, creating attributes of own brand which are not so unique but
essential, clearly identified essence of the brand and its difference from
other companies. Another way to shape and create positive image is public
relations. It’s aimed to create favorable image of the company and refute
undesirable rumors [4]. Nowadays, a public relations as a marketing
communication has great impact to the shaping attitude to the image of the
company. Mix of advertising and public relations brings more positive results
for presenting company in most favorable position.
Brand
of the company is one the main factors which identify image of the company. It
is associated with strong market position of the company and has huge impact to
the perception of the company. Brand makes product of the company well
recognized and easily creates image of the company. In cases when brand
perceived positively, image of the company perceived positively as well. For
Kazakhstan companies, a brand of the company is challenging factor because it
requires a long time to create desirable perception from stakeholders of some
products and company in general. MPP Consulting identified the rating of top 50
valuable brands of Kazakhstan “Kaz Brand – 2011”. The calculated value of the
brand includes only the cost of the brand (its name) without production
facilities, infrastructure, patents, inventions and other intellectual property
[5]. According to this rating the most expensive brand is “Karagandinskoe”
which costs $95 million USD. The second place is “BTA Bank” which is $90
million USD. Despite the financial problems of the bank in the past years it’s
well recognized. The third place belongs to “Rakhat” company which located in
Almaty city and costs $83 million USD. These three brands have best
perspectives for future development and advantage in creating image of the
company on global markets.
The
factors which identify image of the company can be specified to each industry
but the main factors are the same for all kind of companies. Company’s image creation
with the perspectives for its globalization brings more challenge to the company
but at the same time helps to build stronger position at local market.
Perception of the company’s image by stakeholders can be different, changeable
and based on biases. In such kind of situation, brand becomes the main factor
to identify image of the company because of its recognition of company’s
identity and uniqueness.
To
summing up, image of the company plays major role in company’s global position
and has an effect to global market share. In this conference paper we described
the main factors which identify image of the company. The results of it we will
include in our further research.
Bibliography:
1. Stern, B., Zinkhan, G.M., Jaju, A. Marketing images. Construct
definition, measurement issues and theory development. Marketing theory: articles. Volume I (2): 201-224. SAGE: 2001, p.
211.
2. Zinkhan, G.M., Ganesh, J., Jaju. A., Hayes, L. Corporate image: a
conceptual framework for strategic planning. Retrieved November 27, 2011 from http://www.terry.uga.edu/~ajaju/papers/AMA2001.pdf.,
pp. 3-4.
3. Keller, K. L. (2009). Brand
Planning. Shoulder of Giants, p.7.
4. Kotler,P.(2009). Principles of
Marketing. 4th European Edition. Moscow: Viliams.,p. 1050.
5. KazBrand 2011. Top 50 Kazakh Brands. Retrieved November 27, 2011 from http://www.mppconsulting.com.ua/ukrbrand/kazbrand2011.pdf., p. 3.