Shevchyk
Natalia
Department
of the Lviv branch of the European university
Educational
Internet-projects and intercultural communication
The employment of international educational Internet-projects gives
opportunity for teachers and students from different countries to combine their
efforts, to find adherents, partners for implementation of ideas and, of
course, to improve one’s level of knowledge of foreign languages. Besides, the
joint venture incites by itself, it’s convincing someone else can find it useful
and interesting too. Projects like that always exceed the limits of its
objective content and reach the level of socially significant results. The
thorough knowledge integration is one more peculiarity of international
communicational projects, which involves learning the subject of examined
problem and acquainting with specifics of partners ethnic culture and
disposition [1]. That is always the dialogue of cultures.
The first educational network was, probably, the iEARN, established in
1989. One can assume iEARN to be invented because of Soviet-USA satellite
linkups in 1988-1988. The great interest between these countries prompted the
participants to continue communicating, using the exotic thereafterat way – the
e-mail. Then was the time of various initiatives, projects, which, as the time
passed, assumed tremendous range. Today, the participants of the international
educational network iEARN are pupils, students, teachers from over 20 000
educational institutions from 115 countries.
Special internet-resources were made to make finding the project easier, where tens of
trends from different countries are united, which allows to crystalize a new
idea or to find assistants. For example, international Internet-project
Lingu@net Europa was created to further the teaching of foreign languages by
means of multilingual virtual resource center on the Internet. [2, p.143] As
for today, the site runs in English, French, Dutch and German. It invites
teachers, supervisors, methodologists, scientists and students for cooperation.
Lingu@net Europa gives its visitors an access to unique resource fund, which
contains didactic materials, forums, activity plans, politic documents and
perspective forecast in linguist and bibliography of themes, you might be
interested in.
On the Web site of multilingual international Internet-project Viadeo,
one may become a participant in one or more interesting groups and take part in
their activity. The themes of the groups are diverse and inquisitive; it
touches issues of culture and art, economics and enterprise, IT and TV,
professional occupation in numerous fields, political and social problems,
sport, leisure etc.
The projects with the theme of social and cultural aspects of life in
foreign countries, the future profession etc., are chosen to be the student
ones.
The game method, which improves communication between students from
different countries, the use of computer and the Internet, can be used as
preparation for participation in Internet-projects. Tasks like that prepare
them for work in teleconferences and forums, held on foreign languages.
By working on the Internet-project, students study to write letters to
partner school politely and correctly. Speaking of technical matters, they must
be able to log in a network and to send (receive and save) e-mail; log in as an
active conference member; be able to place their materials on Internet, use
search engines and databases.
Model result of student work on project is mutual web-journal. But to
access their activity, efficiency requirements should be used. For example, to
access the activity of members, based on analysis of working material of the
project, polling & interviewing results. The regularity of member access,
meaningfulness and quality (fullness, literacy) of sent messages are also
valued. Besides, students can be offered a list questions, answers to which
could be used for external marking or self-analysis. Questions can be like:
‘how did you organize your activity?’, ‘what part of it did you choose and
why?’, ‘what kind of information did you use, how did you find it?’, ‘did you
have enough time?’, ‘what kind of extra activity did you take part in?’, ‘in
what ways did you use computer?’, ‘who helped you to gather and systematize the
information?’, ‘what did you learn by working on the project (how did you
gather information, in which forms it can be presented, how to write a letter
to a foreign partner correctly, how to conduct a discussion, etc)?’, ‘what have
you learned about yourself and your group members; about foreign partners?’,
‘what was interesting for you and what
wasn’t?’, ‘did you have any trouble with communication?’.
In process of working students should be offered intermediate stages to
be drawn up as short essays, which could be placed on the site forum of the
educational institution on the Internet.
The importance of international
communication projects lies in helping students to overcome being inert and
passive, their disappointment in their own power, gives opportunity to feel the importance of their own knowledge.
The update of student personality by learning extraneous reality and
perception of other culture occurs by the intercession of social & cultural
approach, integrated knowledge of countries, intercultural communication.
Taking part in such projects helps students to use their knowledge of foreign
languages and show the ability to coexist in common space, displaying
consideration and interest in different mentality and foreign culture,
comparing them with one’s views and cultural experience.
1. Ïðîåêòíà ä³ÿëüí³ñòü // Åíöèêëîïåä³ÿ îñâ³òè /
Ãîë.ðåä.Â.Ã.Êðåìåíü. – Ê.: Þð³íêîì ²íòåð, 2008. – Ñ. 717-718.
2. Ðîìàíîâñüêà Ì.Á. Ìåòîä
ïðîåêò³â ó âèõîâíîìó ïðîöåñ³ (ìåòîäè÷íèé ïîñ³áíèê). – Õ.: Âåñòà: Âèäàâíèöòâî
„Ðàíîê”, 2007. – 160 ñ.
3. Ñàãèòîâà Ã.Â. Ôîðìèðîâàíèå
ó ñòàðøåêëàññíèêîâ ïðîåêòíî-èññëåäîâàòåëüñêèõ è êîììóíèêàòèâíûõ òåõíîëîãèé.
Ýëåêòðîííûé æóðíàë „Âîïðîñû Èíòåðíåò îáðàçîâàíèÿ”. http://vio.fio.ru/vio_33/cd_site/Articles/art_2_4.htm.
4. Ñêàë³é Ë. ². Âèêîðèñòàííÿ ³íôîðìàö³éíèõ òåõíîëîã³é ó ôîðìóâàíí³
ïðîôåñ³éíî¿ êîìïåòåíö³¿ ìàéáóòíüîãî â÷èòåëÿ ³íîçåìíèõ ìîâ // ²íîçåìí³ ìîâè. –
2003. – ¹ 4. – Ñ. 5 – 9.