Mgr Sabina Ostrowska[1]

 

 

 

Mission- Oriented Scorecard as a tool for effective management in a public organisation presented on the example of a public hospital

 

 

Keywords: public management, healthcare management, MSC (Mission-Oriented Scorecard)

 

                                                 Summary
               The main assumption to my deliberations is a statement that organizations operating in a public sector and applying performance measurement are more capable of creating higher social values by exploiting political, physical, or institutional resources then organizations, which do not implement such activities. In this article role of effectiveness concept in contemporary management in health care was analyzed and specific discriminants of public management were point out. Additionally Mission-Oriented Scorecard was briefly characterized as a concept having considerable value for both functioning and development for organization operating in the public health care sector.

Introduction

 

The effective functioning and the development of each and every organisation, regardless of its character and scope of operation should be based on the realisation of a well defined strategy. The strategy is to a certain extent a compromise between the actual market situation and the mission of the company.

Until recently the strategic planning encompassed only financial aims, which seemed to be the most quantifiable factors that determine the financial position of a company. Aims that come from the following regions are currently being also considered: customer service, organizational structure effectiveness, the reaction velocity to the changing needs of the market, the learning ability and knowledge management. Such multi-layer strategic management is characteristic of MSC, Missing Oriented Scorecard)/MOS, which has been the effect of the research on the mastering of multi-metres applied in the process of economical effectiveness research.

The aforementioned factors seem to be completely foreign for most Polish health care centres. Despite the fact that health care centre employees undertake steps aiming at changing this state of affairs, nevertheless this process takes time and gradual heightening of the level of economic knowledge in a given health care centre.

The aim of this elaboration is the analysis of possibilities and possible benefits that stem from the fact of implementation of Missing Oriented Scorecard/MOS into the system of public health care system management, which despite their individual characteristics are similar in form and organization status to other small and average sized companies. This is the main reason for management (operational and strategic) related innovations, as well as finance related innovations that are transferred from the Small and Average sized Companies.

   

1.     Missing Oriented Scorecard  within a public organization

 

A large interest in the scope of implementation of a version of Balance Scorecard/BSC [Kaplan i Norton 1992, s. 71-79]  presented as the effectiveness measurement tool within public organizations by Kaplan under the name of Mission Oriented Scorecard/MOS  [Kaplan 2006, s. 10]. 

 

Drawing 1 Hospital MSC Model

Ïîäïèñü: Vission and strategy 

 


                                                                                                                     

Perspective of the stakeholders

The Beneficiaries

How will we be perceived by the beneficiaries (patients) in order to fulfill our mission?

Founder

Jak należy wyglądać w oczach How should we be perceived by our founders (payers, founding body, owner) in order to fulfill our mission?

·         Goals

·         Meters

·         Target values

·         Initiatives

 

Perspective of the processes

Which process needs to be improved in order to satisfy the stakeholders and to fulfill our mission?

·         Goals

·         Meters

·         Target values

·         Initiatives

 

 

Perspective of development

How should they maintain the development in order to improve the critical processes?.

·         Goals

·         Meters

·         Target values

·         Initiatives

 

 

Financial perspective

What should the financial results be to satisfy the founding body / owner and to have the capability of mission's fulfillment

·         Goals

·         Meters

·         Target values

·         Initiatives

 

Source: own compilation based on Kaplan, Norton (2001)

The MSC concept is based on three assumptions. Above all the financial factors are not the sufficient basis for non profit organization assessment, which constitute the mission of the public applicability organizations. Second of all non-material assets constitute the most important element in case of public organization.

The excellent medical equipment is not sufficient itself without the specialist knowledge; without  IT technology, the proper work climate, proper information access in the proper form and in a timely manner, it is impossible to achieve proper organization development. Moreover, there exists a necessity for connection of the long term strategic planning and operational activities. In other words, all organizations have to strive for the elimination of the space between vision and reality.

The main aim of the process of creation of non-profit organisations is to fulfil the public applicability aims and to provide benefits for the whole or for the certain population groups within the given area. Therefore the main aim of these organizations is the realisation of needs of particular groups of individuals, [Fitzroy, Hubert 2005] contrary to the commercial companies, where achievement of the best possible financial result is the main aim.

            In case of a public health care organisation the division into two individual groups is an important factor: benefactors and donces. Payers (most often the National Health Care Fund, economic entities that purchase medical services for their employees) are to be qualified into the benefactor category, and the donces, which include patients, medical service recipients which influence their functioning (establishing entities or owners).

Each of the four perspective is equally important. The attainment of the balance between the perspective aims is the indispensable condition  in the process of achievement of a stabile organization development. This means that if in one perspective it is decided to resign from the realisation of the given aim in order to achieve an aim listed in the other perspective, the organisation enters the phase of lack of balance ex. laying off 50% of staff would have a very beneficial influence on the financial condition of the given organization (assuming that there is not over employment), but the above action shall have a distinctly negative effect on the donces’ interest, through the lowering of the customer service level.

            The MOS model, proves that the process of cost reduction may not be the only strategic aim of the public health care unit (nevertheless, cost optimization is required). From the public organization point of view the creation of a larger donce value from each expenditure is the greater interest. Nevertheless, MOS allows for the process of elimination of all of the costs that stem from projects, investments and programmes, which do not supplement the strategy and do not allow for the fulfilment of the organization mission. What is important from the perspective of a health care centre is  the retaining of the quality of the rendered medical services as well as the retaining of good financial condition. The above stems from the fact that the process of public applicability mission fulfilment is not possible without meeting of the criteria for financial effectiveness. Any cases of inconsiderable financial cuts shall cause panic among patients, they influence the frustration among the centre personnel and make it impossible for the realisation of the organization mission – promotion of the healthy society.

The national health protection system surroundings undergo rapid changes and is characterized by lack of stability of system solutions. The attempts at the reforming of the sector, which were meant to introduce the improvement of the hospital situation turned out to be futile. The atmosphere of constant dispute, the growing patient pressure at the improvement of the health care services and on the other hand the necessity for financial stabilization, puts hospital and other health care centre managers in front of the following dilemma: should the broadly understood service quality and patient treatment levels be put in front of the financial result, or vice versa.

            The experiences of health care organisations in OECD countries show that the aforementioned dilemma may be eliminated. The proper realisation of the public applicability mission requires stabile financial situation, nevertheless this may not happen with all of the costs beared by the patient nor via the lowering of the quality of the rendered medical services. The tool that has turned out to be especially helpful was MOS. The carefully constructed strategy (amongst others: the application of the scope of benefits and patient requirements), the efficiently implemented strategy with application of MOS enables the management staff of the health management centres, reduction or even elimination of the aforementioned dilemma. The basic difference between the commercial companies and non profit organisations is connected to financial issues. In case of commercial organisations the financial issue is the most important one when in case of non profit organisations the public applicability mission is the most important one. In case of  non profit health care organisations, financial reasons do not mirror the sense of existence of the given organisation but they do not constitute the measure of success. This is connected not to the present and future only but to the pas as well. Excellent financial results do not prove the fact that the activities initiated by the hospital have led to the achieving of success. Despite being helpful  the process of controlling or the process of budgeting do not constitute a complex quality management system of a health centre organisational unit, as the y do not define nor provide the measurement of the most important things. MSC is one of the management systems, which in a system-like way defines and measures the degree of success of the non profit organisation.

            As the non profit organisation the public health care centres are oriented at the realization of the public applicability mission. They have been created and they function in order to ensure the complex and proper medical keeping and protection. It is frequent that in case of missions of the health care centres it is the patient, health (ex. in case of mission of the Krosno Hospital[2]). In order to achieve what is the most important, which is to achieve its mission, the public health care centres have to apply their limited centres in a more effective way. The specified mission specifies the sense of existence and defines the frames of the organisation’s activity. The method which is to be applied in the process of realization of the above defines and provides a detailed strategic plan.

 

  1. Mission Methodology- Oriented Scorecard in a public hospital

       

                MOS presents the strategy, therefore the method, which is applied by the health centre unit to fulfil its mission in the form of the so-called strategy maps (Kaplan, Norton, 2000). The strategy map presents the strategic aims placed within the 4 perspectives: key benefactors, processes, development and finance, which have been connected with application of the cause and reason relations (arrows).

In order to realize these aims two areas are quite important. First, all organization processes within a public organisation in the given hospital are performed by the employees, therefore the level of qualifications of the employed personnel becomes an extremely important factor. Moreover one should take special care in the process of choosing candidates for the management positions making sure that they posses the required management skills and should ensure that support of the information systems, which will be helpful in making organisation processes more efficient, should be given. The above fact is connected to the increase of assets devoted to the purchase of ex. medical equipment, the implementation of the ISO system, heightening of employees; qualifications (the IT introductory process), therefore the extremely important factor is the hospital’s financial situation, or engaging of the establishment institution (Voivodship Marshall etc.). Due to the above fact the public organisation manager should place special attention on both the increase of income and cost optimization. Therefore the strategy map is an actualized, logic and unite strategy description. Within each of the four MOS perspectives, not only the strategic aims are formed but also expressed aim realization measurement methods in short and long distance and the strategic initiatives that are indispensable in the process of aim realization.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Îâàë: Give the patients and their families the best care and ensure the high quality of services rendered by an effective organizationDrawing 2 X Hospital strategy Map. 

                                              

 

 

 

 


Îâàë: Adopt the scope of services to the local communityÎâàë: Build patient satisfaction                         

Perspective of

the stakeholders

 

 

 

 

 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Process

Îâàë: Improve the vendor relations’ managementÎâàë: Achieve operating effectiveness of ensuring the careÎâàë: Improve medical and stay care of the patientperspective

 

 

 

 

Îâàë: Implement quality improvement programmes
 

 

 

 

 

 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Îâàë: Ensure the support of the management supporting information systemsDevelopment

perspective

Îâàë: Build employee satisfactionÎâàë: Ensure leadrship in the organizational unitsÎâàë: Develop employees’ skills                                               

 

 

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Îâàë: Cost effectiveness and efficiencyÎâàë: Good financial conditionFinancial

Îâàë: Income growthperspective

 

 

 

Source: based on Kaplan, Norton

 

Picture no. 3 presents the sample aims, values and initiatives that have been put together for Hospital X. The above factors have been taken from the MOS model and in the opinion of hospital management they were key issues in the process of hospital operation.

 

Picture 3 Aims, measurement devices and initiates within the MOS model

STRATEGIC TOPIC

Give the patients and their families the best care and ensure the high quality of services rendered by an effective organization

 

Patient

 

 

 

 

 


Processes

Îâàë: Care about operating effectivenessÎâàë: Improve medical care

 

 

 

Goal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


What do we intend to achieve?

 

Meter

E.g.

- bed coverage

- hospitalization length

 

 

 

 


How to

measure        desired

Project           results’

execution?     level

 

Initiative

E.g.

- optimization of the length of stay

 

 

 

 

 


Strategic         bugdet

projects

Development

Îâàë: Ensure the support of information systems

 

 

 


Finances

Îâàë: Good financial condition

 

 

 

 

Source: elaborated on the basis of Hospital X strategy.

 

            A part of the Hospital X strategy plan that has been presented on picture 3, presents the full version of reason and action connections between the strategic aims. In this case the chain is as following:

·        Good financial situation enables for the possibility for investing in IT systems that provide support for the organisation management process.

·        If a public health care centre organisation shall possess already existing IT systems:

ü      The organization effectiveness shall be subject to increase (the fact which may influence the lowering of the treatment costs through the application of methods applied in the pharma-economics, the comparison analysis of various cases, shortening of the time spent in hospital)

ü      Mastering of the health care centre level (the swift therapeutic decision making process, gathering of the history illness data and the speed of access to the gathered data).

·        If the hospital shall ensure high quality health care coverage, patient satisfaction level shall rise and the organisation’s effectiveness shall also be on the increase.

The following year, the process of creation of measurement devices for particular strategic aims which are to be realised for particular initiatives shall also become indispensable, they also shall determine the timetable for particular initiatives and should connect them to the budget that has been designed to this aim.

Non profit organisations are created in order to fulfil the public applicability aims and to realise the goals for a certain part of population in the specific area. Therefore the basic aim of this organisation is the realisation of the specific groups’ needs, contrary to the commercial company situation  - achieving the highest possible financial result.

           

 

Summary

 

            In case of the banking, car and electronic sectors constant process improvement leads to the reduction of unit costs at the same time witnessing the increase of products and services. The innovation methods are promptly assimilated in the given sector which is to the benefit of the clients.

            In case of the medical service market the situation is slightly different. Costs are high and they are on the dynamic increase. The increase of costs may only partially be connected to the quality improvement processes. The properly applied MOS strategy brings optimistic results. In case of hospitals and other health care centres it allows for decreasing of costs at the same time improving the quality and service availability.

     

 

Bibliography

  1. Bocci F., Luppi E., Neri G., Mission-Oriented Scorecard: A Framework for Public Sector and Not-for-Profit Organizations. The Case of Local Health Authority of Modena [w] Performance Measurement and Management 2006, Public and Private. Papers from the Fifth International Conference on Performance Measurment and Management PMA 2006  Cranfield School of Management 2006.
  2. Bratnicki M. Frączkiewicz-Wronka A.(2006a)  Efektywność organizacyjna i zarządzanie publiczne: Wyłaniające się koncepcje, kluczowe wyzwania i kierunki dalszych badań w obszarze pomiaru efektywności (Organizational effectiveness and public management: New concepts, key issues and the direction of further research in the field of effectiveness measurement process) [w] „Organizacja i Kierowanie” nr 3.Child J., (2005) Organization. Contemporary principles and practice, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.                                                                                                      
  3. D’Aunno T., (2006) Management scholars and public policy: A bridge too far? “Academy of Management Journal” No 48.
  4. Davis S., T. Albright T., (2004) An investigation of the effect of balanced scorecard implementation on financial performance, “Management Accounting Research”  nr 15. Devinney T., Johnson G., Yip G., Hensmans M., Prashantham S., Richard P., (2005) Successful strategic transformers. Referat przedstawiony na corocznej konferencji Strategic Management Society, Orlando (materiał powielony).         
  5. DoH. (2003 ) NHS Performance Assessment Framework. Assessing Performance in the New NHS, Department of Health, NHS.                                                             
  6. Evans J.R., (2004) An exploratory study of performance measurement systems and relationships with performance results, “Journal of Operations Management” nr 22. Ferlie E. Hartley J., Martin S., (2003) Changing public service organizations: Current perspectives and future prospects. “British Journal of Management” nr 14.            
  7. Frączkiewicz-Wronka, M. Bratnicki, A.(2006)  Zarządzanie sektorem ochrony zdrowia w regionie, w: Komputerowo zintegrowane zarządzanie, (Health care sector management within the given region, in: Computer integrated management) red. E. Knosala, OWPTZP, Opole. Freidag H.R., Schmidt W. (2003) Moja strategiczna karta wyników. (Strategic mission key card) Najnowsza koncepcja zarządzania strategicznego C.H.Beck, Warszawa.            
  8. Hughes O.E., (2003) Public management and administration. An introduction Palgrave Macmillan, New York.                                                                                 
  9. Kaplan  R.S. Norton D.P. (1992) The Balance Scorecard: Measures that Driver Performance [w] „Harvard Business  Review vol.70, no 1.             
  10. Kaplan R.S. Norton D.P. (2006) Strategiczna karta wyników. Jak przełożyć strategię na działanie. (The strategic scorecard. How to put strategy into action) Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN Warszawa.                                           
  11. Kaplan R.S., and Balanced Scorecard Collaborative (2006) Inc., A Palladium company.bscol.com za:  Robert S. Kaplan: Balanced Scorecard w sektorze publicznym. Materiały seminarium przeprowadzonego w Warszawie 02.02.2006.
  12. Martinez V., Kennerley M., (2005) Performance measurement systems: Mix effects, w: EURAM 2005. Responsible management in an uncertain world. 5th Annual International Conference Proceedings. TUM Business School, Munich.                      
  13. Neely A., Gregory M., Mills J., Platts K., (1995) Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda, “ International Journal of Operations & Production Management” nr  15 (4).                                                                      
  14. Olson E.M., Slater S.F., (2002) The balanced scorecard, competitive strategy, and performance, Business Horizons nr 45(46).                                                   
  15. Page, S. (2005) What’s New about the New Public Management? Administrative change in the human services. “Public Administration Review” 65(6).
  16. Pollitt C., Bouckaert G., (2000) Public management reform: A comparative analysis, Oxford University Press. Oxford.                                                                                 
  17. Sinclair D., Zairi M., (2000) Performance measurement: a critical analysis of the literature with respect to total quality management, “International Journal of Management Reviews 2000”  nr  2.                                                                            
  18. Zalewski A., Reformy sektora publicznego w duchu nowego zarządzania publicznego(Public sector reforms in the light of new public management) [w] (red.) Zalewski A., Nowe zarządzanie publiczne w polskim samorządzie terytorialnym, (New public management within the Polish territorial management system) Szkoła Główna Handlowa, Warszawa 2000.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



[1] University of Economics in Katowice, Cathedral Publice Management, NZOZ ACAMAR – Sanok. 

[2] http://krosno.med.pl/