Kairova N.I. - a candidate of the legal sciences,

assistant professor Kazakh-Russian International

University

ROLE OF THE HOUSEHOLD RELATIONS IN SHAPING THE CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR MINOR

The President of the country N.A.NAZARBAEV, has specifically indicated that "education of children - a special civic duty of the parents", but, regrettably, many parents not to the full realize their responsiblity. The increasing family dug in education child was discussed on Republican pedagogical forum "Family, school, society - in good future" together. [1]

The Main reason of the growing to criminality among growing generation is concluded in parent. What has the practice shown, in most cases crimes are made by children, about which parents do not take care or carelessly pertain to their education. Wrong education child in household condition brings about development of the criminal inclinations to as far back as infancies, and liquidate these inclinations subsequently not easily.

If parents carelessly pertain to education their own children, the last go on street and become the criminal cases. In household criminology is designed different categorizations criminal family.

When child goes on crime, is usually realized that this teenager was брошен on arbitrariness of the fate, about he did not take care, on he rendered the evil influence conflicts between parent, drunkenness, violence and the other actions, occurring in family. Broad spreading the divorce, tension in relations between parent, absence of the reasonable conditions, cares and control and the other deflections in household relations have occasionally inconvertible consequences, reflecting on psyche of the child, and bring to completion of the public dangerous children subsequently.

The Family is called provide adapting the teenager to the life in complex external environments and protect from destructor stimulus developments. In sphere of the preventive maintenance teenager to criminality role to families at present particularly increases in connection with obvious inability of the state structures to obtain here any observable success.

By degree of the participation in protection of the teenager from criminal behaviour or, other word, on degree of importance of the preventive potential possible conditionally to separate all families on five following types:

1) protecting family, active participant of the preventive maintenance - is oriented on active systematic preventive work. In these family of the parents will die to interact with child. The question is expansion of the themes for dialogue, enabling the criminal behaviour, drug addictions alongside with drunkenness, sexual by laxity, laziness etc. in category informed and realized contempts.

2) immunizing family, consolidating - underrates the risk of completion child crimes revalues his(its) stability a temptation, pressure. The parents in such family will not add the person of importance warning enlightenment teenager, but then they are oriented on maintenance of the harmonious relations in family, close-fitting emotional relationship. The parents as they were consciously reduce its authority, retreat in shade, sure of that that at age of the teenager on the first place without fall must be a company person of the same age.

3) neutral family, returning their own duties on protection of the teenager from criminal behaviour - emotional disassociated, with formal relationship. The Parents practically closes the eye to problem, neglect that risk, which is subjected to the child, not having reliable full tilts in family. The Parents believe in positive public influence and own power.

4) giperward family - practices all-out checking for vital activity child, breaking his(its) right on development and self-determination. The parents in family of this type try to reproduce the style and relations in family, where they grew, disregarding individual child, changed circumstance and conditions of his(its) development.

At, the parents strive personally to check the child, but, on essences, manipulate them, obtruding him "into the name of their good" certain tastes, stereotypes of the behaviour, priorities, jealous to keep the child from stranger of the influence, directing his(its) interests on itself and family. Hereunder quite often s the special artificial ambience of the residence child. Exactly for such family typical wrong parental strategy trusteeships and dictate, bring teenager to protest in behaviour, to destruction of valuables to street company , to diversionary emancipation.

5) family, not capable to execute the defensive function - presents itself example typical "incomplete parental correspondence to". In such family of the parents ungrounded increase the borders of the liberty child (sometimes from эгоистических of the considerations: "let grows independent", "what with him to nurse") and neglect many their own duty on care for child and provision to him behooving conditions for unbringing and developments. [2]

Criminality minor grows disproportionately quickly. Practically get exact given it is difficult since in criminality child very big level to secretiveness, when crime is made, but law-enforcement organ about this unknown. For instance, not all victims violence, pocket and housing thefts, fraud declare about made in respect of their fact criminal encroachment. The Reasons miscellaneouses, hanging from nature of the made crime. For decision of the problem to youth criminality necessary to turn paramount attention a state on social side of this problem. However, find the way of the decision given problems without study factor impossible, bring about growing of criminality amongst minor. They are:

1. Economic and social badly. The Child from social disadvantage family, for which typical social insulation, unsatisfactory housing conditions, which parents have little prestigious sorts occupation or are unemployed, have a greater chances to be a constant participant of the offenses and often abuse the alcohol and drug.

Economic (social) lacking amenities condition can be determined by social workman, social teacher and noted in card of the observations as one of the possible factor of the risk. In this instance follows to promote social adaptation a family with low level social badly by means of realization possible legal or economic measures (the separation mat. help, assistance in device of the parents and able-bodied child on work, determination child in sanitarium, baby camp, social hotels and etc.). However, children from successful семьей also quite often make the crimes. This is connected with that that parents anxious its material and social position, forget about education child (that can not be not reflected on psychological welfare child).

2. The Disadvantage encirclement. The Regions, differing high level to criminality, with often changing occupant, do not promote origin a feeling associations and generalities amongst people, inhabitting them, which exists in more successful region with smaller density of the occupying and low level to criminality. The Foul proximity and public lackung amenities give the basis to expect wide-spread abuses by alcohol and drug amongst youth.

3. Neumelosti and inconsequence in education. In family, in which parents do not install the clear rates of the behaviour, in which children remain to be given to themselves and where disciplinary practice excessively severe and inconsequential, teenager are subjected to the greater risk of completion of the offenses and frequent using the alcohol and drug.

4. The Aptitude to антисоциальному to behaviour. This factor of the risk is mainly connected with boy from five before seed of the years. The Boys of the younger classes of the grade school, unsociability and insulation amongst classmate which is explained by their aggressiveness (for instance, boys, which will not die well to hit it off with the other child during plays), in alike measure subject to risk offenses and abuses drug in youth age. If aggressive behaviour is accompanied the activity in infancies, also exists the pain-sewing probability that that beside youths will be a problems with abuse by alcohol and drug.

5. The Protest and risk in youth age. Podrostkovyy age known as age of the increase the protest against existing in society of the adult people of the moral rates and principle. Since negative attitude exists uniquely in society adult to drug and drug addict, teenager of one of the forms of the protest choose use a drug, completion of the crime. [3]

The Analysis to criminality in our country is indicative of that that established alarm situation with youth criminality to aggravate-sya that that total number of the young population in Republic Kazakhstan lasts to decrease.

To example at the average annually make the crimes: at age 14-15 years - 2,7%, 16-17 years - 6,9%, 18-29 - 51% and adult population senior 30 years - 38, 5 %, what see the main part forms the youth. [4]

Annually grows the number a child, residing in difficult life situation, needing for help and protection state, increases the factor social orphanhood. Regrettably, подростковая criminality gets younger, but crimes made minor, become more cruel since violence and cruelty, emonstrated with screen television set, become for child by rate to everyday life. The Parents forget about child, replacing their own duties upon their education on school. But children, given to itself, conduct the most of time for street, in circle doubtful friends, easy go on crimes.

The State and society necessary: intensify checking for activity organ, concerning with questions to families and child; develop and realize the program, directed on employment minor (after all, when children by occupied sport or visit the mugs, beside they do not remain time to be going to on street, use the alcohol a drink, gaining money on drinks by criminal way).

So, either as was noted on Republican pedagogical forum, in Kazakhstan necessary to create the holistic system of the household enlightenment, education teacher, psychologist, household doctor, district surveyor to police bodies on work with parent.

The List of the used literature:

1. B.T.ZHumagulov. "Family, school, society - in good future" together. The Material of the Republican pedagogical forum. Astana, August 25 2011.

2. SHestakov D. A.Semeynaya criminology: criminofamily. 2-e изд. SPB.: Izdatelistvo"yuridicheskiy centre press", 2003. S. 39-3.

3. The Criminology. The Textbook under editing Rogova I.I., Alauhanova E.O. Almaty. "International centre of the scientific studies and legal expert operation RK". 2008.с.361.

4. The Women (woman)s and men Kazakhstan (the statistical collection), - Astana: Agency of the Republic Kazakhstan on statistics, 2011. - 124 c.

Resume

The given article is opened the role to families and its behavioural influence upon shaping the criminal behaviour minor. It is described factors, which bring about growing of criminality among minor, which making necessary to take into account the holistic system of the household enlightenment.