Экономические
науки/ 6.Маркетинг и менеджмент.
Mihailenko T.
Vlasova I. A.
Donetsk state university of economics and
trade
after Michael Tugan-Baranovsky, Ukraine
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
Economic
indices of 2006 demonstrate positive dynamics of the state development and
certify certain adaptation of business entities to new conditions. Gross added
value augmented by 7% if compared with 2005 (last year index amounted to 2.7%).
This process took place in all spheres of Ukraine's economy, notedly in trade,
transportation, and construction, on the background of
abrupt increase of labor intensity and production intensification.
Majority
of experts were careful in assessing the outlooks of Ukraine economy last year.
Meanwhile, increase of prices for energy carriers by and large did not prevent
development of economy real sector. Improvement of situation with foreign and
investment demand allowed Ukrainian producers to adjust to new expense level
without significant losses. If the most power intensive
kinds of economic activities curtailed production volumes in the beginning of
2006, then starting from the second half of the year metallurgy and machine
building industries became locomotives of industrial production growth.
According
to the words of Martin Rizer, leading economist of the World Bank, such result
in conditions of price growth for imported gas proves strength of industrial
sector, its liquidity, profit, motivation and adjustment to changing prices for
energy carriers. In turn, it shifts business to modernizing of production and
reduction of power generating resources' consumption. The fact that prices for
metal increased on foreign markets rather than dropped is another growth
determinant. Ukrainian consumers spent more
resources for consumption, that encourages growth of economy in the result.
Industry,
trade, and transportation are priority sectors in Ukraine. Acceleration of
industry growth was secured to a great extent by growth of production in
metallurgy, machine building, food industry, and electric power generating. By
the way, growth cumulative trend became positive. Volumes of industrial output
expanded in December 2006 both against the previous month (by 2.2%) and versus
December 2005 (by 12%). Accretion of production in industry amounted to 6.2%
according to the results of the year, thus doubling the indices of 2005.
Metallurgy and metal working, as well as machine building had a determinant
influence over improvement of industrial output dynamics.
Growth
of production volumes were noted in all main kinds of activities except for
coke production, output of oil refinery products, and light industry articles,
including by 5.8% in mining industry (by 4.4% in 2005), by 6.3% in processing
industry (3%), and by 6.9% in the companies generating and distributing electric
energy, gas, and water (2.9%).
The
number of profitable companies of the industry made 59.4% over January-November
2006 (60.4% over the corresponding period of 2005).
Growth of
output in chemical and petrochemical industries took place due to increase of
prices for fertilizers on the world market. In the beginning of the year the
industry suffered certain losses because of gas price augmentation. Production
volumes in the industry increased by 3.2% (by 9.8% in 2005).
Output
in chemical industry increased by 0.9%, including by 1.7% in production of base
output, by 6.5% in pharmaceutical production, and by 3.1% in production of
soap, perfumes, cleaning, and polishing agents. Output of rubber and plastic
articles correspondingly augmented by 0.8 and 15.8%. Meanwhile, production of
paints and varnishes diminished by 14.6%, while output of artificial and
synthetic fiber decreased by 6.8%. The number of profitable companies in the
industry amounted to 64.9% (69.4% in January-November 2005).
Growth
of food industry and processing of agricultural produce took place at the
account of growing domestic demand fostered by higher minimal wages, minimal
retirement pension, and other social donations, major portion of which was
spent for purchasing foodstuffs. Households occupy 22% in the pattern of food
industry output use, therefore encouraging of domestic demand significantly
influences development of the industry. At the same time, essential accretion
is connected with increase of oil and sugar production thanks to good harvest
of sunflower and sugar beet. Also growth of pork and poultry production
contributed to the growth of the industry (supplies of meat and milk group
output to Russian Federation were partially renewed in the end of 2006).
Situation
on the local market significantly impaired after amending the Law of Ukraine
"On customs tariff", when import duties for shoes, textile, and other
light industry articles were curtailed For example, import of male shirts
augmented 10.6 times (it exceeds output 6 times), and male suits - 6.8 times
(exceeds production 15 times). Local producers do not sustain competition and
as a result demand for their output diminishes.
Ukraine
ranked the first in 2006 by accretion of direct foreign investments and the second
by volumes of drawn direct foreign investments among the states of Southern and
Eastern Europe. Pursuant to UNCTAD (UN Conference on Trade and Development)
report "Direct foreign investments to developing states and economies in
transition - expected effect from development", only Russia left Ukraine
behind by volume of direct foreign investing in the region. However, it should
be taken into account that Russian economy is much larger than Ukrainian one. Experts
think that Ukraine's success is a result of reforms and improvement of
investment climate. "We are optimistic about development of situation in
Ukraine. These are more than just words. Ukraine possesses great capacities for
business development. Therefore we are sure that economy should advance in high
rates", Dr. Edilberto Segura, representative of Sigma-Bleyzer company,
stressed during the meeting of European Parliament Delegation on ties with
Ukraine in Brussels. He noted herewith that acceleration of Ukrainian economic
growth and its economic stability would to a great extent depend on ability of
the new government to continue reforms and to essentially improve conditions of
doing business in the state.