UDK 159.922:316.64:165.242.2+34:008

Dmitrienko I.V., senior teacher of University of Idea  ( Kharkiv-Kyiv)

Dmitrienko Yu.N., Ph.D., bread-winner of scientific degree of doctor of legal sciences of the Kievan National research university, the name of T. Shevchenko (Kyiv)

 

GOING NEAR|to| STUDY OF PROBLEMS OF COUNOUNTRY – LAW CONSCIOUSNESS|intelligent| AND  CULTURE AND  INDIVIDUAL IN POLITICO-LAW STUDIES OF S. PUFENDORFA

 

       At for some time past the Ukrainian legists increase attention|attn.| to|by| the inheritance|legacy| of large|great| foreign legists of the pas, probing|explore| it|her| from new|firsttime| actual|topical| positions. Time came, when possibility|potentialitie| came not only to criticize, but also creatively to develop actual|topical| for Ukraine XXI in. ideas of legal acknowledgment| of authoritative western thinkers.  As the known researcher of legal studies B.C marks|note|. Nersesyants, there is                         a necessity to lean against experience|tentative| of the pas «at development|elaboration| of new|firsttime| theoretical conceptions, on historically   humanism traditions which was folded|gotes| and approved as common to all mankind value [1]. In this relation|referring| Ñ. Pufendorf, using|utillize| the elements of anthropological approach in the politico – law | studies, tried|attempt| to connect|confounding| the right ideas of different|diverse| forms|shape| of legal consciousness|intelligent|, characteristic|character| for the forms|shape| of rationalism of natural|real-life| sense of justice with the legal ideas of | orientation|directionality|. Concentrating|focusing| attention|attn.| on country – law consciousness|intelligent|  of individual not only within the limits of the universal system of absolute|natural| law but also at the terms of concrete social reality, Pufendorf to a certain extent|up to a point| provided for and considerably|signficantly| developed a sociological right for understanding and law- confession |, what substantially approached the positive|staid| forms|shape| of sense of justice to|by| their sinergistical prospects. Preeminently|exactly| | positive|staid| law- confession |  of Pufendorfa stipulated contradictions|contradiction| in the estimation|appraisal| of his|its| creation the West-European thinkers. Conception of co-operation of country – law | consciousness|intelligent| and individual (in his|its| concrete understanding as states and individual) is built from the row|file| of ideas. A central|center| place|seat| occupies|borrow| in it|her| idea of rights for an individual, which|what| hatches from the natural|real-life| necessities|need| of man on life, freedom|liberty| propert, formative | catalogue|directory| of absolute|natural| laws of man. The special value|importance| in conception of Pufendorfa gets an idea legal of centralized, but not simply|uniquel| distributive on branches|branch|,  organizations of the system of state power. In politico – law consciousness|intelligent| of Pufendorfa realizable attempt of distinction of civil|citizen| society and state, civil|citizen| sense of justice, and country – law |. Pufendorf offered the elaborate design of contractual|agreed| relations between the state and individual. After conception of Pufendorfa a limit|border| is between absolute country – law consciousness|intelligent| and individual|first-aid| - relative, this country – law consciousness|intelligent|  plays a substantial role in determination|definition| of the last. The additional guarantee|warrantly| of observance of rights for an individual is|appear| realization of idea of legality both in activity of public  organs and in the actions|act| of individuals. A static|tiedown| right comes forward in conception of Pufendorfa that maintenance which links|couple| normatively legal and ideological world view relations of different|diverse| forms|shape| of country – law and individual|first-aid| legal consciousness|intelligent| and culture. It comes forward in Pufendorfa as a right is objective and as a right is subjective, process| is formed as subjective and objective legal consciousness|intelligent| [2-4]. Objective sense of justice arises up by a grant the state of rights to give|publish| out an order, to discuss them and judicially carry|perform| out, based on a cleverness and justice, and|but| subjective (positive|staid|) sense of justice arises up through|from|  rational establishment of naturalness|real-life| of freedom|liberty| of man, which requires obligatory verification its law, his|its| norms|standard|. |

LITERATURE|utillize|

 

1. History of country – |M: Yurist', 2008. – P. 4

2. Pufendorf-Studien|. Beitrage| of zur| of Biographie| Samuel| von| of Pufendorf| of und| seiner |of Entwicklung| of als| of Historiker| of und| theologischer| of Schriftsteller| of von| of Detlef| Doring|. - Berlin|, 1992

3. Saasnamoinen| K. The| of morality| of| the| fallen| man|: S. Pufendorf| of on| natural.| - |. Helsinki|, 1995

4. Kurzenin E.B. S. Pufendorf at contract // Of Angliya of è of Evropa: problems of history |:  International study scinces task||||. – Arzamas: AGPI, 2008