UDK 159.922:316.64:165.242.2+34:008

Dmitrienko Y.N, Ph.D., bread-winner of scientific degree of doctor of legal sciences of the Kiev National research university the name of T. Shevchenko (Kyiv city)

 

GOING IS NEAR|to| STUDY  PROBLEM OF FORMING, DEVELOPMENT OF STATE-RIGHTS|intelligent|  AND CULTURE, IN COUNTRIES OF THE NEWLY INDEPENDENT STATES

 

      After the specific of Ukrainian state-rights| consciousness|intelligent| of employees|collaborator| of Ukrainian firms|, as well as state-rights consciousness|intelligent| of employees|collaborator| of enterprises of other countries – participants of the newly independent States in their development unhardness to find|expose| out general|common| in main|head| - in aspiration to create strong state-rights|| consciousness|intelligent|, when, both Ukrainian sense of justice and to sense of justice of other former|quondam| soviet states, positively identified the constituents of world sense of justice, capable|clever| right to remove|reflect| domestic|home| legal reality in the context of world and as world. But it should be noted that realization of many legal ideas and practical steps|footpace| of guidance of countries of Concord in this direction restrains temper the row|file| of human and objective factors, including passing of rates|tempo| of forming of national forms|shape| of consciousness|intelligent| and sense of justice of employees|collaborator| of enterprises, in relation to the scientific|science| ground of conception of development of the national state system  at the terms of the final permanent prevailing|dominate| of remaining functions of postsoviet| form|shape| of sense of justice. In this connection, becoming and development of national forms|shape| of sense of justice quite often are carried out not on the adjusted methods of scientific|science| design|imagineering|, but remind|reminding| the method of tests and errors|mistake|. The old forms|shape| of sense of justice collapse, and then|and then| recommences|restores| anew, without|senza| the account of old succession of former|quondam| soviet socialistic sense of justice, the traditional are cast|reject|   aside and proclaimed new|firsttime| geopolitical forms|shape|. Undeveloped of general|common| theory of sense of justice, that took into account both  historical experience|tentative| of evolution of national sense of justice and modern socio-political realities, negatively affects|designated| quality constitutionally legal adjusting|adjustment| of processes|Carbro| of construction functioning of leading institutes|institution| of new|firsttime| independent forms|shape| of sense of justice and states|. After the conducted researches|work-up| [1-2] of origin of state-rights| form|shape| of consciousness|intelligent| as social phenomena

| is|appear| the logical link of process|Carbro| of creation|making| people as by the subjects of sense of justice of the biologically|life-form| not set mechanism of existence. A concept|notion| « state-rights| consciousness|intelligent|» in the category vehicle of theory of the state and right executes|implement| a row|file| judicially explanatory, axionology|, rightidentifying, rights| and rightverifying functions, which exposes the rich in content and formal-juridical | specific of the different|diverse| stages of this process|Carbro| in direction of forming of sovereign state-rights| consciousness|intelligent|, his|its| institutes|institution|. In the wide value|importance| a concept|notion| « state-rights consciousness|intelligent|» is engulfed|wrap-round| by the complex of elements, structures, institutes|institution| of public power, organization and forms|shape| of functioning of which|what|, on the different|diverse| stages of development of social| predefined historically difficult|complex|, economic|economical|, political, socialculture| originality of concrete people|peoples| or group of people|peoples|, traditional form|shape| of consciousness|intelligent| and sense of justice. From the moment of origin of Ukrainian state-rights| consciousness|intelligent| and state system of independent Ukraine, them the personal touch was an ethnic variety, and|but| by leading principle of decision of national question is principle of «unity in a variety», actually|in f| off |forms|shape| of consolidation of sense  of justice of otherethnicconcords.

 

LITERATURE  

1. Ginsberg|, M. The| of idea| of| progress|.  - London|, 2008. - P.  48

2  Szabo| Denis|. Crimes| | of Villes|. - Paris|, 2007; Marshall| B. Clinard|. Sociology| of Deviant| Behavior|. - New| York|, 2006; Calvin| F. Schmid|, Urban| Crime| Areas| (Amer|.  Sociol|. Rev|., Vol|. 25, 1960). - New| York|, 2008; Higgins| P., Butler| R. Understanding| Deviance| // Of McGraw| - Hill| Book|, 2005; An interview is from professional|. N. Lumanom // Problems of theoretical politic|. – 2007. – ¹ 63. - P. 236-248