Ôèëîëîãè÷åñêèå íàóêè. / Ìåòîäèêà ïðåïîäàâàíèÿ ÿçûêà è ëèòåðàòóðû.
Sikaliuk A.I., Grechok L.M.
Chernigiv State Institute of
Economics and Management
Effective English language teaching
methods: “PPP”, “ESA” and syllabus.
The number of
different English language teaching methods available may seem a little
daunting when you first start teaching. It doesn't need to be a scary subject
though.
Many schools will have their own preferred
teaching methods, so often you will be asked to stick to a particular method
when teaching.
Other schools leave
you free to teach in any way you want to. Most are a combination of the two.
The most common
methodology taught in ESL training courses is "PPP" (Presentation,
Practice and Production). "ESA"
(Engage, Study and Activate) is also
popular among trainers.
So what are these
two English language teaching methods?
These methods are
similar but there are some key differences. PPP is more controlled and involves
a lot of "teacher talking time," especially in the first stage.
The first stage,
'Presentation', is where the teacher firstly finds out how much of the target
language (for example the grammar or vocabulary to be taught) the students
know. This is called "eliciting."
The teacher will
then present the language structure, usually on a board.
The students are generally expected to listen
during this part of the lesson and their opportunities to speak are limited.
In the second part
of the lesson, the students are given controlled practice of the target
language.
This could be in
the form of oral exercises, targeted at individual students, or in the form of
worksheets during early stages.
Again, this part of
the lesson is very teacher-led. Often more than one activity is given, each one
allowing the students progressively more freedom to produce the language
themselves.
The third part of
the lesson, "Production," is where the students start to produce
language more freely.
For example, they might be given role play
situations to devise and act out, they may have free writing exercises, or
there may be other opportunities to produce the language they have been working
on.
But there are also disadvantages of “PPP” as well as advantages.
Firstly, the amount
of teacher talking time is disproportionately high compared to the amount of
student talking time, certainly in the first part of the lesson.
It encourages
accuracy over fluency, and this is not always the desired outcome of a course.
Thirdly, it does
not allow for recap, or movement between the different stages. This is where
the “ESA” (Engage, Study and Activate) teaching method is often preferred now.
“ESA” is becoming increasingly popular within
teacher training programs.
It allows for much
more flexibility, and lessons often move between the different stages. However,
the same basic structure is given, with the need for presentation of some kind
before any practice is given.
In the “ESA”
method, there is more emphasis on student-led grammar discovery, eliciting the
grammar from students rather than giving a detailed (and often boring!)
teacher-led presentation.
The final stage,
with free practice, is the same as the last stage of “PPP”.
Remember, whichever
method you follow, it is important to make sure your students get as much time
as possible to communicate.
If you stand at the
front and are a "chalk and talk" style teacher, they will get limited
practice time.
It is therefore very important to include
work in small groups or pairs as part of your lessons. This gives the students
much more time to speak English during classes.
There are many
other English language teaching methods. Old-fashioned "repetition"
style teaching (the Classical method) are not popular now, and many of the
styles that were developed in the 1970s have also gone out of favor as needs
changed.
No doubt new
methods will increase in popularity in the coming years, but whichever method
or combination of methods you follow, if you know your students and put their
needs first, many English language teaching methods will give you useful ideas
for your classes.
The syllabus is an
important component of course development. It lists the subjects to be covered,
the class readings and assignments. The syllabus also usually establishes rules
for the class and grading procedures. A good syllabus gives the students a
clear idea of the class objectives and expected outcomes. When teaching English
as a second language classes to adults, there are several methods you can use
to create an effective syllabus.
Obviously deciding
in which language to write the syllabus is a major consideration. Syllabi for
beginning classes should be written in the students' native language. For
advanced students, the syllabus should be written in English because that is
the language they are studying. Avoid using English words in the syllabus that
the students would be unfamiliar with when beginning the class.
Many syllabi
emphasize the course schedule. They detail each class period, stating what
students should read for each class period, the subject to be covered and assignments
due. This type of syllabus works well when the teacher knows the class is going
to follow a set schedule. It is less effective when the teacher wants to work
at the students' pace, because it is usually difficult to get back on schedule
without rushing the students.
Another method is
to have a more flexible schedule. This type of syllabus usually lists the
sections to be covered along with the readings and assignments required for
each section. However, specific dates are either not included or presented in
very broad terms. This allows students to know what is expected of them when
each section begins while giving the teacher flexibility.
This type of
syllabus devotes less space to explaining schedules and timelines and instead
emphasizes the purpose of the course and expected outcomes. The focus is on the
class material and what students are supposed to learn from the various
sections. It explains topics in detail and how the course will be graded.
Part of every
syllabus should be devoted to establishing the rules and regulations for the
class. These include rules for absences, late assignments and tardiness. Some
teachers prefer to make this the focus of their syllabus to prevent future
misunderstandings. Such teachers are usually more flexible about timelines and
schedules, concentrating more on making sure students understand the rules of
the class.