Dmitrienko Y.M., Ph.D., bread-winner
of scientific degree of doctor of legal sciences of the Kiev National research
university, the name of T. Shevchenko (Kyiv city)
GOING
NEAR FORMING OF WAYS OF DEVELOPMENT OF COMPOUND
The future states of difficult
frames of society are not simply opened and unforeseeable, there
are spectrums of possible forms of future organization, field of possible
ways in the future. Although ways
of evolution can be
much, but their amount is not
endless. A spectrum of
structures-attractors is not continuous. Not all, that
is included in intentions of
subject of reformative activity, realized on this social
environment (in the frame of society). The future forms of social organization are opened as a
fan of the predefined possibilities .
Passage-ways in the future are ambiguous and narrow . There are certain <<
corridors of >> evolution. The task of the guided openness of community development gets up from here, guarded and selfsupported development. The task of choice of harmonious way
gets up in the future [1].
The synergetic legal
analysis of the difficult systems testifies that, as a rule, they
have a few alternative
ways of development.
Multiplicity of evolutional way, absence of hard determination narrows
basis of extaology pessimism. It strengthens a hope on
possibility of choice
of ways of further development, thus such, which would
arrange a man and
would not be destructive
for an environment. The
ways of evolution (aims
of development) are much
although, but with the choice
of way in points bifurcation , that on
the certain stages
of evolution, the some
predefined of development of processes proves .
The real state of the
system is determined not only its pas, its history but also
built, formed from the future. It is possible to model the spectrums of structures-attractors, spectrums of
<<goals> > ñàìîðàçâèòèÿ of frames of society. The task
of receipt of such spectrums
of structures of the opened nonlinear environments is
while decided only in
the special cases. Here before
the scientists opening the enormous field of search , which was initiated by the synergetic of
right, is opened ,
on determination|definition| of optimum
spectrums of economic and
geopolitical patterns, because it
contingently determination of processes of
evolution from the future.
The synergetic of right
grounds us
an idea, that chaos can
come forward as a creating
structural beginning . Chaos, disorder, from point
of synergetic of right, is not something destructive , destructive , by deviation from
the main way
of evolution, and comes
forward necessary its stage, structural beginning ,
anchorman to
organization of new more difficult structures. Way of chaos,
a thermodynamics branch remains
one of possible ways
of evolution in the opened
nonlinear environments . By the analogue of chaos
in social area there is a market,
market in the generalized sense,
not only market of products
of financial labour but
also market of services, market of
idea, market of scientific information. Such
generalized market is the selfregulator of social processes . He is the generator of new information, social and
cultural innovations, but is not a panacea from all our
misfortunes [2].
Through chaos connection of different levels of organization is carried out. There are small|mini|
indignations in moments of instability , fluctuations
can overgrow in
macrostructures. It ensues from
this general conclusion ,
that efforts, the actions
of one man are not sterile , they not always
fully are cut-ins in general motion of sociality .
In the special states of instability of social environment
of action of separate
man can influence
on macrosocial processes . In this connection the
necessity of awareness of the personal
responsibility everybody flows
out for the fate of the frame of society,
all humanity.
LITERATURE
1. Dmitrienko Y .N Positive
of jurisprudence : forming of spirituality
in Ukrainian legal consciousness .
- ¹
3 (8) 2008. Teacher’s science|: Sp .
z.o.o of «Science and studio »,
2008. – P. 42-54
2. Dmitrienko legal consciousness|. – Y . N. Transformation of
valued-semantic in Ukrainian¹ 3 (8) 2008. Teacher’s science