Post-graduate student
Iermoliuk R.S.
Scientific supervisor Yerysh L.A.
Donetsk national university of economics and
trade
named after M. Tugan-Baranovsky, Ukraine
The
use of acoustic emission for testing
coatings
properties
The use of acoustic emission to detect cracks in
engineering structures under stress, such as North Sea oil platforms,
high-pressure, vessels, aircraft wings, etc., has been commonplace for a number
of years.
However, it is a novel application to study the acoustic
emission of coatings under stress. This technique has proved to be of
considerable use in monitoring and even, in some cases, predicting the
durability of coatings during environmental testing, such as natural
weathering, accelerated weathering, salt spray corrosion tests, etc.
In addition, it has proved very useful in evaluating
the effects of formulation variables on the ultimate mechanical properties of
coatings, and in evaluating these properties for the individual layers of a
coating system, as well as elucidating the ways in which these properties
interact in producing the total properties of the full system.
The technique
is, in principle, extremely simple. Any sudden microscopic movement in a body,
e.g. crack formation and propagation, may give rise to acoustic emission. For example,
strain is concentrated at the growing tip of a crack. As this crack propagates,
strain energy is released in two main forms: as thermal energy and as acoustic energy.
The acoustic energy radiates as a deformation wave from the source, and is refracted
and reflected by solid inclusions and interfaces until it reaches the surface of
the body. Here the surface waves may be detected by sensitive detectors:
usually piezoelectric or capacitive transducers. The amplified signal from the
transducer is then analysed.
Familiar examples of acoustic emission, at frequencies
and intensities audible to the human ear, are the cracking of ice on a pond or
the creaking of the treads of wooden stairs under the weight of a human body.
The paint is coated onto one side of a metal foil
strip, and this is then inserted in the jaws of a tensile tester; the
transducer is attached and the sample stretched.
The noise emitted is analysed, and some noise
characteristic is plotted as a function of total strain.
Although tensile testing is more usual, there is no
reason why bending or any other form of deformation may not be used. The only
essential is that there should be no spurious noise generated by slippage
between the specimen and the instrument’s clamps. This is why, in practice,
slow deformation rates are used. Apart from this source of noise, there is no
need to shield the apparatus acoustically, narrow-band resonant piezoelectric devices
(resonant frequency around 150 kHz) to be satisfactory for this purpose.
Good acoustic coupling between the transducer surface
and the specimen is essential to maximize detector sensitivity: this is readily
achieved by means of a thin connecting layer of silicone grease.
The methods of analysis available for characterizing
the acoustic emission are numerous. Because of the simultaneous occurrence of
many noise sources, often of different kinds, as well as the modification of
the waveforms both by propagation through the body of the specimen and by the
response characteristics of the detector itself, it is very difficult with
acoustic emission from paint specimens to analyse the complex signal forms to
obtain information about the original signal source.
There is also too little theory or experimental work
with ‘model’ systems relating waveform characteristics to source mechanism.
Thus complicated frequency analysis or amplitude analysis techniques are not
generally useful, although amplitude analysis can be revealing if the failure
mechanism changes drastically, for example, if there is a change from micro- to
large-scale cracking at a particular strain value.
The manufacturers have concentrated on using simple
analysis techniques, such as plots of ‘ring-down’ or event counts against total
strain to characterize the coating, and have then used these on a comparative
basis, for example, to monitor changes in the failure properties of coatings
during weathering, to study the effects of changes in formulation or chemical
structure on the ultimate mechanical properties of the coatings, etc. This
simple utilization of the technique has proved extremely useful.
If the amplified voltage output of the transducer,
corresponding to a single event, is idealized as a sinusoidal decay curve, then
in ring-down counting, one count is registered every time the voltage rises
above a threshold voltage (this is imposed to stop random electrical noise
affecting the analysis). In event counting, a preset delay is imposed after the
first count before another can be registered. By proper choice of the delay
time, comparison of ring-down and event counts will give a crude estimate of
the average amplitude of the signals. A cumulative plot of total counts against
strain is then produced for each.
The use of
acoustic emission for testing coatings properties is the perspective
development in coating industry.
References:
1. Paints, coatings and solvents. Dieter Stoye; Werner Freitag (ed.). - 2. completely rev. ed. -
Weinheim; Wiley-VCH. 1998.
2. Paint and surface Coatings. Theory and
practice. Second edition. Editors:
R. Lambourne and T. A. Strivens.
Cambridge, England. 1999.