Assan Zhulamanov (MBA), London School of Commerce, UK
Saule Iskendirova (PhD), Ulzhan Zholaman,
Kokshetau University after Sh. Ualikhanov,
Kazakhstan.
WHY DO STUDENT’S ACADEMIC PROJECTS OFTEN
FAIL?
Abstract. This
paper aims at discovering any positive and negative factors that influence on
results of a student’s academic projects or a dissertation, particularly at the
final period of study program. Students may find the accepted research methods,
written format styles and ways of quoting/referencing works are different from
those they are used to. Further, this article provides literature review of the
previous and current situation in the field of study. Due to the fresh
questionnaire results and up-to-date information from newspapers, the authors
tried to differentiate this paper from others.
Key words: Academic
projects, MBA dissertations, research methods.
I. Introduction. Typically,
the MBA dissertation aims to allow the student to develop and demonstrate
powers of rigorous analysis, critical inquiry, clear expression and independent
judgment in relation to an area of business activity. Most MBA dissertations are normally based on an in-depth
investigation into a managerial problem within the student’s own organization.
The most usual requirement is for more than just problem-solving typical of
management consultancy since it requires the student to stand back from the
problem, conceptualize it and explore its wider implications for other managers
outside the particular case. [Gill & Johnson, 1997].
According to White [2002] the
dissertation is an important phase of a Masters programme, in that it allows
you to individualize your programme and research an area of business and
management that interests you. It allows you to demonstrate in a positive way
the business and professional skills you have acquired to date. However, the thought of having to write up
to 25,000 word dissertation often causes the most able student to feel undue
pressure and anxiety. In fact, the first word which comes to mind for many
students when faced with the task of starting a dissertation is HELP!
If
you are undertaking your research project as part of a course of study the most
important attribute will be that it meets the examining body’s requirements and,
in particular, that it is at the correct level. This means that you must choose
your topic with care. Some universities require students to collect their own
data as part of their research project while others allow them to base their
project on data that have already been collected. You therefore need to check
the assessment criteria for your project and ensure that your choice of topic
will enable you to meet these criteria. [Saunders, Lewis, Thornhill, 2000].
Meanwhile,
White [2002] gives his own description about the time management as an
important criterion in any project writing process. Start writing up as soon as
you have gathered any material, don’t keep putting it off, or you will end up
with huge amounts of data that are very difficult to sort out. Plan a realistic
time schedule for writing up, and then stick to it. Remember that this should
include time for writing, typing up, printing out and binding your work. If one
aspect of the work is going slowly, don’t be afraid to leave it for a few days,
and return to it another time. The change of material helps you to see the
overall context. Because dissertations are so long, you can often lose sight of
this and can get bogged down in one section, especially if that section appears
to be difficult to write.
Interestingly,
Fabb and Durant [2005] demonstrate the following techniques: look for ways of
making time for yourself to work, and a place where you can work productively.
Home may be too full of distractions, and the boundary between work and other
activities may be too thin there, so you may need to define somewhere else as
your working place. If your working place is also your bedroom, then you maybe
in danger of not building a clear enough barrier between the stresses of your
work and you need to sleep. If the library isn’t quiet, look for an empty room
somewhere else, and work there. Exploit gaps; take something to read on the bus
or while waiting in a queue. Keep a pen on you and some paper so that you can
record good ideas whenever you have them.
‘Where small things make a big difference’: some company’s advertising
slogan said. We would substitute the ‘things’ for the ‘ideas’. So that really
express the essay writing process.
II. Research objectives. Our
position is to make clear that the main approaches to management research
– namely experimental research design, action research, survey research and
ethnography – are all imperfect. Each has advantages and disadvantages in
the kinds of data it affords and in its vulnerability to particular kinds or
error. One way of overcoming each method’s weaknesses and limitations is
deliberately to combine different methods within the same investigations, a
strategy we call “multimethod research’… Students have also reported
some difficulty with the ethnography sections. This we believe is probably
because such a methodology is strange to students brought up in a predominantly
positive culture. [Gill & Johnson, 1997]. Most project tutors will argue
that one of the a good knowledge of the literature, enable you to assess the
extent to which your research is likely to provide fresh insights on the
topic. Many student believe this is going to be difficult. [Saunders, Lewis, Thornhill, 2000].
What
about the information sources?
So,
what facts of student’s study process we can also consider as a somewhat
negative. As mentioned by Zinsser [2001]:
“You only write as well as you make yourself write”. So, let us examine the
interesting factor named ‘Plagiarism’. Plagiarism
comes from the Latin word ‘plagiarius'
which means kidnapper. Generally, the word means theft or use of someone else's work without giving proper recognition or
reference to it. In England (and America) it is considered CHEATING.
According
to a survey published by the Freshminds recruitment consultancy, as
many as one in four university students may have cheated by copying
material for essays from the internet. The online survey was sent
out last month to 600 recent graduates from all disciplines and 1000
officials of the National Union of Students. A total of 363 people responded. The survey included 10 returns
from students who had done a health related degree, but most replies
were from arts students. It
showed that 16% of respondents had plagiarized work more than once
and that a further 9% had plagiarized once. The detection rate among
those who had plagiarized was 3%. The survey defined plagiarism as
"inserting sections of text from any outside source into your
own work, whether they are left whole, or amended to conceal their
origins." [Eaton,
2005].
III.
Evaluations of findings. In order to
find out the other non-positive factors on the topic field, the following cognitive
studies of National Student Survey helping us with this. According to analyst Knight more than 150,000 students were
questioned how "satisfied" they were with their course. It can be
seen from these surveys that there is no absolute measure of
"satisfaction"; it is only a measure of the gap between expectation
and experience. Therefore, if you have low expectations and all turns out well,
then you are very satisfied. And vice versa, if you have high expectations and
these are not met, then you are dissatisfied.
In addition, the studies
show that the main determinant of "satisfaction" is the subject, not
the university. These groups of students are more dissatisfied than any other
about assessment methods. The most satisfied students are those studying
philosophy. The least satisfied are on art and design courses. To answer the
topic question ‘why do student’s academic projects often fail?’ this paper
produces the following outcomes.
Positive factors |
Non-positive
factors |
Intellectual and practical skills
Choosing your topic with care Individualizing your programme and researching an area of business
that interests you Exploit gaps and record good ideas Collecting your own data as part of research project Library and information retrieval skills Checking the assessment criteria for your project Main determinant of "satisfaction" is the subject |
Research methods, written format styles and ways of
quoting/referencing works are different Teaching methods and different forms of assessment Rigorous analyzing, critical inquiry, clear expression and independent
judgment Time management Place where you can work productively Writing and note-taking skills, research skills, personal skills. ‘Plagiarism’ |
Arguably,
the positive factors chosen from the literature review as a theoretical part of
this essay mean the factors more preferable for students and likely help them
to improve for example practical or information retrieval skills easily. But ‘non-positive’ side includes more or
less difficult and to some extent complex factors that students may have. As
some thoughts concerning the major
reasons for failure are based on the theoretical material, it would be
interesting to look at the primary data.
The
results that have come recently from our ‘Questionnaire’ research method
demonstrate us more or less the real picture. Practically, the lecturers,
tutors, marketing and examinations department’s officers (14 respondents) at
London School of Commerce have been asked to select the main factors that
affecting the students while they are writing the academic dissertations.
Analyzing and comparing the contents that questionnaires have we can arrive to
an interesting conclusion. Ranking the preferences/levels of impact on each
factor reporting the following outcomes:
Table 1. Respondent’s replies. (Low level -1, 2; Middle level - 3; High
level- 4, 5).
factors |
Raiting |
||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
Plagiarism |
x |
X |
xx |
Xxxxx |
xxxxx |
Part-time job |
x |
Xxx |
xxx |
Xxxxxxxx |
|
Wrong research method |
xx |
Xxx |
xxxx |
Xxx |
xx |
Cheating |
xx |
Xxxx |
xxx |
Xx |
xx |
Topic misunderstanding |
x |
Xxxx |
xxxx |
Xxxx |
x |
Teaching methods/ quality of
teaching |
|
Xxx |
xxxxxx |
X |
xxxx |
English language |
|
Xxx |
xx |
Xxxxxxxx |
x |
‘Culture shock’ |
Xx |
Xxxx |
xxxx |
Xxx |
x |
Paraphrasing |
|
Xxxxx |
xxxxxx |
Xx |
x |
The
table 1. shows us the following:
Plagiarism
and English language were recognized as the most affecting factors by 10
respondents and only 2 of them ticked the low level. Part-time job is very
close to be at the same level (8 and 4 respectively). Further, there are three
factors (Wrong research method - 4,
Paraphrasing - 6, , Teaching methods - 6) in the middle position. So,
this means that student’s projects often fail for these reasons also. Finally,
‘Culture shock’ and Topic-misunderstanding share the middle and low levels (4/4
and 4/4) but Cheating (4) is selected as the less influencing factor.
In
addition, respondents mentioned other different problems students usually have
such as: no extensive research, no critical evaluation, late submission of
assignments, lack of planning, no improvement, student’s life is ‘partying’,
time keeping, supervision etc.
IV. Summary. To sum up, the
authors would like to believe that students can solve all of the problems they
might have doing an academic projects in their courses by themselves. Such
aspects as plagiarism and paraphrasing seem to us widely distributed even in
the high-level standard universities and schools. However, nowadays the
teaching methods and quality of teaching are still the important parts of
student’s life. Therefore, the Board of
Education must pay attention to them firstly. In fact, we live in a crazy
computerized world, world of clever machines, in the era of information
technologies and these facts extremely influencing the human being. And the
easiest way to get any useful information or study material is just to click
the ‘mouse’ cursor.
The literature.
Gill, J & Johnson, P. (1997) Research Methods for Managers, 2nd.ed.,
Paul Publishing Ltd., London, p.viii, pp.3,4,14,15
Saunders,
M, Lewis, P, Thornhill, A. (2000) Research
methods for business students, 2nd ed., Pearson Education
Limited, UK., pp.13, 14, 16, 17, 51
Zinsser, W. (2001) On writing well: The classic guide to writing non fiction, New
York, Quill
White, B. (2002) Writing
your MBA dissertation, Continuum, London and Biddles Ltd., UK, pp.2, 7, 8,
9, 141.
Knight,
P. (2005) Satisfaction
depends on proximity to cows, The Guardian, Nov.15
Fabb, N & Durant, A. (2005) How
to write Essays and Dissertations, 2nd ed., Pearson Education
limited., UK., pp.2,3,4,5.
Eaton, L 2005, A quarter of UK students are guilty of
plagiarism, survey shows.
Retrieved: December 2, 2005 from http://www.bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/abridged.html