Mariola
Grzybowska-Brzezińska, Ph
Jacek Michalak,
Ph
Warmian-Masurian
University in Olsztyn
Faculty of
Economic Sciences
Department
of Market and Marketing Analysis
Agro-tourism as an opportunity for service activity development in small
and medium-size agricultural farms in Poland
Key words:
agro-tourism, prospects for agro-tourism development
Summary
The main purpose of the research was to determine
factors that shape the development of agro-tourism in one of the municipalities
of Poland. The scope of gathered information includes three aspects: resources
that farms possess (cultivation area, animal population, infrastructure),
assessment of motives for starting agricultural tourist activity, and
assessment of services provided by agro-tourist establishments. The research
also took into consideration an evaluation of prospects for functioning of
agro-tourist services and analyzed factors that shape the development of
service activity in rural areas. In accordance with a tendency existing in this
industry, agricultural tourism is an activity undertaken by small and
medium-size farms, for which agro-tourism is a part that supports agricultural
activity. The conducted research shows that revenue from agro-tourist activity
obtained by farmers, initially considered supplementary, can in time evolve
into the main source of income, especially in regions with high natural
potential that is favourable to recreation and tourism.
Introduction
An observation of economic activities performed by
agricultural households in the area of tourism, conducted in many countries,
indicates that this type of activity is mainly a consequence of seeking
additional or alternative income in many areas related to agriculture, which is
caused by a decrease in profitability of agricultural production and worsening
of standard of living of rural population. In Poland there is a special need
for improving the situation of agricultural farms because the still developing
and struggling market economy puts the rural population in a situation where
they have limited options for selling their crops at low and unstable prices
while their production costs increase, unemployment is relatively high, rural
youth has limited opportunities for advancement and the standard of living is
worsening. In this situation the Polish countryside can be revitalized mainly
through changes in non-rural areas, such as creating new jobs in many fields
related to agriculture and stimulating rural population to become active in
seeking alternative ways of using both, agricultural farms’ resources and the
natural potential of the country (Sznajder, Przezbórska 2006).
As one of many ways of reviving rural area
development, agro-tourism contributes to unemployment reduction through
creating new jobs in all trades providing services to tourists. Agro-tourism,
as a source of income contributes to the preservation of natural and small
agricultural farms. It preserves culture and tradition and becomes a bridge
between the country and the city that provides an opportunity for meeting new
and interesting personalities. In literature there are many definitions of
agro-tourism. One of them is presented by Jedrzejczyk: agro-tourism is a type
of business activity in tourism, based on accommodating paying guests by owners
of agricultural farms (Jedrzejczyk 2001).
Błonski and Korzuchowska define agro-tourism as
recreation directly on a farmstead, combined with observation and participation
in everyday activities performed by its permanent occupants, and providing an
opportunity to enjoy agricultural produce, as well as other goods offered by
such farms (Korzuchowska 1994).
Yet another definition is presented by Drzewiecki,
namely that agro-tourism is a form of rest that takes place in agriculture
oriented rural areas that provide accommodation and recreational activities
related to agricultural farming or its equivalent and its surroundings (natural
environment, production and service). What ought to be emphasized in this
definition is a clearly visible emphasis on the relationship that takes place
between the tourist and performed by him recreational activity and an
agricultural farm. This relationship is an important element distinguishing
agro-tourism from other forms of rural tourism (Drzewiecki 1995).
Besides many premises supporting the development of
agro-tourism in Poland, there are many adversities that result from the overall
economic situation. On the one hand there is a declining profitability of
agricultural production that forces owners to seek other sources of income, and
agro-tourism is based on resources of agricultural farms, but on the other hand
– its development requires adaptive investments, which are not easily financed
by occupants of low-income agricultural farms.
In addition, a factor hindering the development of
agro-tourism is the status of infrastructure in rural areas. The road system is
not well developed and the quality of existing roads is bad, and the rural
population is not provided with phones, water pipelines and sewage systems.
People have limited access to banks, post offices, health care facilities.
There are not enough recreation centres, sports and cultural centres. Another
barrier is an insufficient knowledge of foreign languages, making it impossible
for owners to service foreigners. Existing barriers adversely influence the
developed and attractiveness of recreation in rural areas (Wojciechowska
2002).
And so it becomes important to identify what
opportunities for development agro-tourist activity has, and define the level
of competitiveness of these services, especially in areas valuable for their
natural resources that offer opportunities to popularize tourist-related
activities.
The scope of the research
The main purpose of the research was to define factors shaping the
development of agro-tourism in the Olsztynskie district (Warmian-Masurian
voivodeship). In the research an attempt was made to analyze the accommodation
and recreation base, evaluate services provided by agro-tourist farms, indicate
forms of funding of agro-tourist activity and define prospects for the
development of agro-tourist services in the examined establishments.
The research was conducted in the summer of 2007. Data came from 42
farms located in the Olsztynskie district, situated in the central part of the
Warmian-Masurian voivodeship, located in north-east Poland.
The scope of gathered information involved three aspects:
resources possessed by farms (cultivation area, animal population), motives for
starting agro-tourist activity and types of provided agro-tourist services.
Characteristics of the studied area
The Olsztynskie district is located in central
Olsztynskie Pojezierze and is characterized by a diverse landscape, lakes and
forests. Differences in height between elevations and depressions reach 30
metres. The land abounds in lakes (155 of them have surface area greater than
1ha), which together cover 11739 ha, over 4% of the total area of the county. Throughout the
district flow the biggest rivers of the voivodeship: Pasleka, Lyna, and Pisa.
Moreover, two Warmian districts – Broniewo and Frombork lie on the Vistula Bay.
This abundance in water makes Warmia a dream place for aficionados of kayaking,
fishermen and yachtsmen. Total area of the county is 2, 837 km2,
including 48,1% of arable land and 35,9% of forests. In terms of surface area,
the Olsztynskie district is first in the Warmian-Masurian voivodeship and third
in the nation. The greatest attribute of the Olsztynskie district is its
natural environment. Uncontaminated forests, lakes and rivers create an
ecosystem hospitable to rare species of animals and plants. There are 11
reservoirs in the district and 14 ecological plots of arable land. One third of
the area of the Olsztynskie district situated within the limits of Warmia is
covered with forests. In the Olsztynskie district there are approximately 200
natural monuments, most frequently unique trees and boulders.
Research results
Agricultural production profile in the examined agrotourist farms
The research attempted to determine land resources
that the examined agrotourist farms possess. Agrotourist activity is thought to
take place when there is agricultural production (it does not have to be on a large
scale, but it should take place). Research results confirm this state of
affairs. All farms included in the research had arable land. In the case of 40%
, its area oscillated within a 10 ha range (table 1).
Table 1. Arable land resources in the examined agro-tourist farms
(in %)
Specifications |
Answer structure in % |
1. Farm land |
|
a. area of 10 ha or less |
40 |
b. area from 11 to 20 ha |
27 |
c. area in excess of 20 ha |
33 |
2. Arable land |
|
a. area of 5 ha or less |
53 |
b. area from 6 to 10 ha |
14 |
c. area in excess of 10 ha |
33 |
3. Grasslands |
|
a. area of 5 ha or less |
53 |
b. area from 6 to 10 ha |
20 |
c. area in excess of 10 ha |
27 |
Source: Own compilation based on research
The smallest group constituted of farms with an area
from 11 – 20 ha, only 27% of those examined. For the purpose of land structure
analysis, the land was divided into arable land and grassland. Approximately
33% of the examined farms owned arable land with an area in excess of 10 ha,
and in 53% of farms an area of this type of land did not exceed 5 ha. Results from an
analysis of land structure show, that agrotourist farms can be counted among
small-size ones and they are not typical production farms.
Through an analysis of animal population, it can be
stated that agrotourist farms kept various types of livestock. Horses were bred
in large numbers – in 34% of farms there were more than four of them. In less
than half of the farms (47%) beef cattle were bred and of those 27% had herds
counting more than 10 animals. The smallest branch were pigs – only 13 % of
farms had more than three animals from this group (table 2).
Table 2. Animal population on the examined agro-tourist farms
Specifications |
Structure In % |
1. Horses |
|
a. 4 or less animals |
33 |
b. over 4 animals |
34 |
c. no horse-breeding |
33 |
2. Beef and dairy cattle |
|
a. 5 or less animals |
7 |
b. from 6 to 10 animals |
13 |
c. more than 10 animals |
27 |
d. no cattle-breeding |
53 |
3. Pigs |
|
a. 3 or less animals |
20 |
b. over 3 animals |
13 |
c. no pig-breeding |
67 |
Source: Own compilation based on research
In accordance with a tendency existing in this industry, agricultural
tourism is an activity undertaken by small and medium-size farms, for which
agrotourism is a part that supports agricultural activity. By utilizing the
surrounding environment’s resources and their potential, it is possible to
diversify farming activity because small-scale production does not adequately
generate profits.
Motives for engaging in agrotourist activity and the offers of the
examined farms
The majority of examined respondents launched their activity in the
years 2002 – 2005. Most of the farms were characterized by important
distinguishing features, such as attractive location, natural reservoirs and
scenic parks, which are an attraction for nature aficionados. Distinguishing
features of some of the agricultural farms were characteristic buildings in the
form of historic cottages or old, rustic houses. The majority of examined
respondents have been engaged in conducting farming activities from two to four
years – 4%, and second to them were farms which have been operating for more
than seven years – 27%(illustration 1).
Illustration. 1. The period of time the examined farms were involved
in agro-tourist activity (in %)
Source: Own compilation based on research
The smallest group constituted farms where agrotourist activities have
been pursued for a relatively short period of time from one to two years – only
7% . In 65 % of farms agrotourist activity is pursued throughout the year,
while in 35 % only in season.
Among factors that inclined respondents to engage in
agrotourism, the most frequently mentioned was a desire to obtain additional
income – 93%. Having spare accommodations and being located in an area
attractive for tourists was an incentive for 73% of respondents, whereas 40 %
of respondents were motivated by friends and neighbours’ example as well as an
opportunity to follow their own interests. A relatively low number of answers
indicated as an incentive a suggestion of an agricultural consultant – 7%, and
information broadcast by radio, television and press – 13% (table 3).
Table 3. Motives for engaging in
agro-tourist activity in the opinion of agro-tourist farms’ owners (in %)
Specifications |
Answer structure in % |
·
agricultural consultant’s suggestion |
7 |
·
friends and neighbours’ example |
40 |
·
municipality officials’ suggestion |
- |
·
family tradition of accommodating tourists |
13 |
·
desire to obtain additional income |
93 |
·
lack of permanent employment |
26 |
·
opportunity to follow own interests |
40 |
·
activity of farmers wives’ circle |
- |
·
having spare accommodation |
73 |
·
information broadcast by radio, television and press |
13 |
·
demand within local environment |
- |
·
location in an area attractive to tourists |
73 |
·
obtaining preferential loans |
13 |
Source: Own compilation based on
research
An important factor indicating the need
for the development of agro-tourist activity, similarly to other
non-agricultural activities, is the income situation of the population engaged
in agriculture and high unemployment in rural areas. Agrotourism is an
important element of vocational elicitation of population engaged in
agriculture. Engaging in economic activity in this field creates job
opportunities for all family members living on farms, and also for other people
living in rural areas (Wojciechowska 2002).
The primary form of accommodation in
examined farms was guest rooms in host farmer’s house. The standard of a
dwelling-house where guest rooms are situated largely influences the condition
and opportunities for the development of an agrotourist base (table 4)
Table 4. Location of guest rooms in the
examined agricultural farms
Specifications |
Answer
structure in % |
·
in a separate house |
20 |
·
in an assigned section of a house occupied by farmer’s family |
73 |
·
on the same floor as farmer’s family |
13 |
·
in camping houses |
13 |
·
in adapted farm buildings |
- |
Source: Own
compilation based on research
The majority of surveyed respondents (7 %) offered
tourists rooms in assigned sections of their houses, occupied by farmers’
families, 20% of hosts offered tourists a stay in separate houses, which were
built solely for that purpose. Only 13% of owners offered tourists
accommodation in cabins or on the same floor as farmers’ families.
Some farms offered guests a possibility of purchasing
food (fruit, vegetables, dairy). In addition, 30% of the examined
establishments sold products which had been manufactured using ecological
methods of production.
The examined group of farmers offered tourists various
types of services in order to make their stay more attractive and provide them
with suitable conditions for recreation. An important attraction offered by
farmers was participation in agricultural activities. However, not all farms
offered this type of service. The main reason for that was concern for guests’
safety.
The most common were farms that offered double guest
rooms (from 1 to 7) – 86%. Rooms for three people were offered by 80% of farms,
single rooms were offered by 53% of establishments (usually one or two rooms).
Rooms that could accommodate four people were offered by 40% of farms, and the
least common were farms equipped in rooms for four or more people – 20%.
In most of the examined agrotourist farms, guests were
provided with a refrigerator, cookware and dishes (80%), separate kitchen
(73%), in-room bathroom, sporting and recreation equipment, garage, parking on
site, garden and an orchard (60%). It ought to be mentioned that 20% of the establishments
had a playground for children, and 13% had a sauna (table 5). The fact that
tourists have access to sporting and recreation equipment plays a very
important role in making the agrotourist offer more attractive. Tourists have
at their disposal bicycles, provided by 80% of farms, kayaks by 73% of farms,
grills by 67% of farms, lawn tennis rackets, billiard and tennis tables by 2 %
of farms, pontoons and sailing boats by 13% of farms. Due to attractiveness of
the region, agrotourist farms often operate all year round. For tourists
visiting in winter, owners try to increase the attractiveness of their offer.
They have saunas available for tourists, who happily enjoy them after long
sleigh rides, ski rentals, and for ice skating enthusiasts farms built ice
skating rinks.
Table 5. Conditions of stay offered to guests in the examined farms
Specifications |
Answer structure (in %) |
·
in-room bathroom |
60 |
·
shared bathroom and WC in a hall |
33 |
·
day room – television room |
27 |
·
game room (billiard, darts etc.) |
27 |
·
kitchen shared with hosts |
13 |
·
separate kitchen |
73 |
·
refrigerator, cookware, dishes |
80 |
·
sporting and recreation equipment |
60 |
·
garage, parking |
60 |
·
camping |
40 |
·
playground for children |
20 |
·
garden, orchard |
60 |
·
sauna |
13 |
Source: Own
compilation based on research.
Factors facilitating the
development of agrotourism and the level of profitability of agricultural farms
Factors facilitating the development of
agrotourism in rural areas of Poland are mostly the competitive prices of
agrotourist lodging in comparison to typical recreation centres, where prices
are comparable to prices offered abroad (Kurek 2004).
Offering tourists the basic elements of a tourist product such as
lodging and food, is an alternative way of using family potential of an
agricultural farm as well as a source of additional income. Moreover,
fulfilling various needs of tourists in terms of recreation and an interesting
way of spending time creates further employment possibilities and an additional
source of income.
The majority of surveyed respondents stated that of the greatest
significance in development of agrotourism are resources and development of a
municipality where an a farm operates. The most frequently mentioned one was an
overall development of the municipality and development of social and technical
infrastructure (13% indications each). Of significant importance are also:
landscape protection, clean environment, settlements’ development and
preservation of local culture (9% of indications). The least important factors appeared
to be the change of customs and attitudes of a population and providing income
for people (8% of indications each).
Creating favourable organizational –
financial conditions would contribute to farmers’ increased interest in
pursuing agrotourist activity, increase in the number of tourists and increase
in numerous financial and non-financial benefits to rural population (Kurek
2004).
Agrotourism as an important factor in
economic development of rural regions also stimulates social development. By getting
to know the values of an agricultural farm, work performed in agriculture,
lifestyle, traditions, cultural values and customs, tourists become more
respectful of them – which in turn increases the sense of self-worth in people
living in the country, awakens local patriotism etc. The presence of tourists
on a farm and in the country increases the concern for cleanliness and
aesthetics, improving in the long run the quality of life of local villagers.
In the examined agrotourist farms income obtained from
agrotourist activity accounted for 20% of total income. The main source of
income, constituting 45% of profits was income from agricultural activity, only
10% of income came from non-agricultural activity (table 6).
Income obtained from agrotourist activity is only an
additional mean of sustenance, more importance in this arrangement is given to
agricultural activity. Not without significance are pensions and retirement
payments received by family members. The share of income from agrotourist
activity is not significant, which considerably hinders the development of such
activity in the examined establishments. It is essential to increase earnings
from this type of activity, which will allow for better functioning of the
examined establishments.
Table 6. The structure of income obtained in the examined farms (in %)
Specifications |
Structure in % |
·
running an agricultural farm |
45 |
·
agro-tourist activity |
20 |
·
non-agricultural activity |
10 |
·
retirement payment, pension |
15 |
·
paid employment in a working place |
10 |
Source: Own compilation based on research.
The development of agrotourism creates opportunities
for growth for other business activities because it attracts tourists and
generates demand. It forces a necessity to engage in and expand industries like
trade, gastronomy, hair styling and cutting services, transport, recreation and
sport. It increases demand for food products and catering. Bakeries, butcher’s
shops and small food businesses etc. come into existence and expand their
activities. New jobs are created. Therefore, it can be stated that agrotourism
leads to the creation of many non-agricultural sources of income. It is an
opportunity to stimulate business activity in rural areas (Sznajder,
Przezbiorska 2006).
Agrotourism is mainly an additional source
of agricultural income for rural population. It forces development of local
infrastructure such as environment protection machinery, recreational and
sporting equipment, retail outlets, catering services and others.
Socio-economic benefits derived from agrotourism are connected to stimulating
development of agricultural farms and small trade, production, and service
companies.
Conclusions
Agrotourism is an important form of agricultural farms’ diversification,
which means taking advantage of resources that an agricultural farm possesses
in pursuing non-agricultural activities. Agrotourism development means
introducing into rural areas new non-agricultural functions, which are a vital
condition for multifunctional growth. This growth ought to be accompanied by agriculture
restructuring and modernization processes, and as a result a number of jobs
should increase, unemployment should decrease and rural population’s economic
activity should develop.
Economic importance of agrotourism is connected to
vocational elicitation of rural population. It is based on the transformation
of agricultural activity into service activity. This creates new jobs for people
previously employed in agriculture and for people residing with them.
The necessity to meet various needs of tourists
staying in rural areas creates in turn the need for a team effort of rural
population to create a versatile offer including lodging, food, recreation,
sightseeing, as well as to create appropriate methods of reaching city dwellers
with this offer and convincing them to purchase it.
A factor that encouraged respondents to engage in
agrotourism was largely the prospect of obtaining additional income and the
fact that a farm was located in a commercially attractive area (tourist
potential, availability of transport, condition of natural environment). In
accordance with a tendency existing in this industry, agricultural tourism is
an activity undertaken by small and medium-size farms, for which agrotourism is
a part that supports agricultural activity.
Agrotourism can become an especially
important source of income for population related to small agricultural farms
with production on a small scale and low yield of
marketable agricultural output. Agglomerations of small, dispersed farms are
located i.e. in the eastern and south-eastern parts of Poland, which are
geographically and scenically attractive regions with regard to tourism.
Agrotourism is also a realistic form of non-agricultural activity in areas
typically located in close proximity to large cities.
Revenues from agrotourist activity obtained by
farmers, initially considered supplementary, can in time evolve into the main
source of income, especially in regions with high natural potential that are
favourable to recreation and tourism.
Litarture:
DRZEWIECKI M. 1995:
Agroturystyka: założenia – uwarunkowania działań. Instytut
Wydawniczy „Świadectwo”, Bydgoszcz:
45-38.
JĘDRZEJCZYK I.
2001: Ekostrategie w zarządzaniu
firmą. PWN, Warszawa: 89-94.
KORZUCHOWSKA B. 2000: Wybrane
piśmiennictwo z zakresu agroturystyki.
PWN Warszawa: 40-68.
KUREK K. 2004: Turystyka
w rozwoju lokalnym. PWN, Warszawa: 56-98.
SZNAJDER M.,
PRZEZBIÓRSKA L. 2006: Agroturystyka, PWE, Warszawa: 56-78.
WOJCIECHOWSKA J. 2002: Uwarunkowania rozwoju agroturystyki w Polsce w świetle zmian ilościowych. Wyższa Szkoła Turystyki i Hotelarstwa, Gdańsk: 49-89.